On 2016-08-26 13:15, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:06:25AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
I don't think that apt should step outside the configured priorities
without instruction from the user. Since apt doesn't currently
interact with the user (but aptitude does), it can
On 2016-08-25 at 23:06, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>> If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the
>> result requested on the command line (here, installing the lower
>> version of the depended-on package), that solution should be chose
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:06:25AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities in
> > this regard are messed up.
>
> The same will happen with custom priorities set.
>
> > If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the result
> > re
On 2016-08-25 at 23:06, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities
>> in this regard are messed up.
>
> The same will happen with custom priorities set.
I am referring not to repository prioriti
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities in
> this regard are messed up.
The same will happen with custom priorities set.
> If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the result
> requested on the comm
Hi,
Quoting The Wanderer (2016-08-25 15:29:27)
> In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities in
> this regard are messed up.
>
> If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the result
> requested on the command line (here, installing the lower version of the
>
On 2016-08-25 at 09:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 10:44, Исаев Виталий wrote:
>
>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake,
>> flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1),
>
> This has nothing to do with mk-build-deps. Given this:
>
>> ➜ apt-cache policy flatbuffers
>> flatbuffers:
>> Installed: (n
On 2016-08-25 10:44, Исаев Виталий wrote:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake,
flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1),
This has nothing to do with mk-build-deps. Given this:
➜ apt-cache policy flatbuffers
flatbuffers:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.4.0-17
Version table:
1.4.0-17 500
500 http://repo1
Hello! ?
I need to build a project which depends on the particular version of
third-party library:
? cat debian/control
Source: libhole-cpp
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Vitaly Isaev
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake,
flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1),
libboost-dev,
libboost-system-de
9 matches
Mail list logo
