If anybody is trying to get assistance from the upstream community, using
fewer idiosyncratic acronyms might help.
And regardless of whether it ever built on MIPS, it clearly should not have
given that there isn't a 1.6 Java there.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no
I have to say that I am quickly losing any interest in working on this as
well.
The acronym wall and general surliness of the various posters makes
contributing to debian much less inviting than it might be. I, too, am a
volunteer and have little time for attitude. Much better for me to go
Ted Dunning writes (Re: more about Zookeeper):
If anybody is trying to get assistance from the upstream community, using
fewer idiosyncratic acronyms might help.
Sorry about that. This list is normally used for communications
internal to Debian, and perhaps some of the participants
That all sounds very reasonable.
I have raised the issue with the upstream Zookeeper community to see if
there is
a demand for Zookeeper to be in Debian. Obviously, if there isn't any
demand, then
the process of recruiting a new Debian maintainer for ZK isn't worth the
effort.
I will keep you
Hi Ted,
thank you a lot for your email! I really mean that. It would be wonderful to
get more communication going between Apache and Debian. I've learned that
these two large and important free software projects are nevertheless
different in many ways.
I also appreciate very much the nice
]] Neil Williams
| Irrespective of disagreements with the current maintainer, zookeeper is
| not good enough for Debian stable simply because it has a separate
| release-critical bug. #626020 - FTBFS on mips. There is no argument
| about this - failing to build from source on a supported
* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no, 2011-06-14, 17:14:
Seems like it's never built on mips,
$ rmadison -S zookeeper -a mips -s unstable
libzookeeper-dev | 3.3.1+dfsg1-2 | sid | mips
libzookeeper2| 3.3.1+dfsg1-2 | sid | mips
python-zookeeper | 3.3.1+dfsg1-2 | sid | mips
zookeeper-bin
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:07:30 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com writes:
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch. He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and
On Du, 12 iun 11, 21:44:37, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
#602694 needs to stay open and blocking zookeeper from Squeeze until it
has a maintainer team that is confident they will be able to handle the
stable support and also confident that the package is good enough
(actually that it
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 12 iun 11, 21:44:37, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
#602694 needs to stay open and blocking zookeeper from Squeeze until it
has a maintainer team that is confident they will be able to handle the
stable support and also confident that
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch. He has a bad opinion of
Zookeeper and things it is not good enough for Debian.
I would like to provide a countervailing view. Thomas and I get along
very well in person, but there are
definitely somethings that we do
Hi,
this sounds interesting, where can I find packages to test?
mike
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Zookeeper
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org
Debian packages?
Or the original code itself?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
this sounds interesting, where can I find packages to test?
mike
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Zookeeper
Perhaps this is what you need: http://packages.debian.org/sid/zookeeper
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Debian packages?
Or the original code itself?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
this
Thanks, I would like to try it out. I am currently experimenting with
kestrel for creating a distributed openstreetmap rendering system.
http://osmopenlayers.blogspot.com/2011/06/get-started-with-renderbot-net.html
I have looked at hadoop before, but I dont know if it will be good for a p2p
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:07:46 +0200
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch.
For the benefit of the list, I suspect this is #602694 which is at
least partly a personal thing for the current Debian maintainer.
Debian,
Zookeeper is independent of hadoop except by heritage.
Hadoop should be excellent as a rendering system for maps. Map-reduce
is used extensively by Google for similar operations.
The basic idea is that you scan across all objects emitting a copy of
the object tagged with the tiles that object
I just looked at this bug and it looks like a configuration error in
the environment rather than a bug in Zookeeper per se.
In particular, Java = 1.6 is an explicit requirement of the Zookeeper
package while the error being emitted is highly characteristic of an
attempt to compile 1.6 compatible
retitle 626020 zookeeper: incorrect dependency information
thanks
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
I just looked at this bug and it looks like a configuration error in
the environment rather than a bug in Zookeeper per se.
In particular, Java = 1.6 is an explicit requirement of the
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:49:51 +0200
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I just looked at this bug and it looks like a configuration error in
the environment rather than a bug in Zookeeper per se.
Subsequent comments by Henrique show that this is not the case. I don't
care about the
Hi,
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, it is a bit strong language to blame code quality for a
build system configuration error.
Quality code should detect that the build configuration is wrong
before the build itself actually
Hi,
[ CC'ed Thomas in case he is not subscribed to d-d ]
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com writes:
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch. He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and things it is not good
enough for Debian.
Could you please provide a
Yes.
This looks more like bad packaging than either bad environment or code.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
retitle 626020 zookeeper: incorrect dependency information
thanks
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
I just looked at this
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
[ CC'ed Thomas in case he is not subscribed to d-d ]
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com writes:
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch. He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and things
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
The interested party might also not know how packages are maintained
in Debian. And I don't think it is helpful to threaten upstream with
removal of his software from Debian, certainly not in the first answer.
Please be a bit less aggressive.
Eh,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com writes:
There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
Koch. He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and things it is not good
enough for Debian.
Could you please provide a reference?
How
26 matches
Mail list logo
