Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread john
Bart Schuller writes: > Has anything changed since then, or do we have a too short collective > memory? I had always assumed that everything in non-us contained encryption code, as do the few things in it that I have actually used. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domai

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote: > People, > > The fact that there even exist two debian versions of mutt should tell > you that it was an issue for people. Looking through the changelogs, I > see that mutt was moved to non-US in Feb. 1997: > > mutt (0.61.1-1) unstab

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Bart Schuller
People, The fact that there even exist two debian versions of mutt should tell you that it was an issue for people. Looking through the changelogs, I see that mutt was moved to non-US in Feb. 1997: mutt (0.61.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Now non-US. (Bug #7257) --

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Alexander Koch
Hi Roland. On Sat, 17 October 1998 10:36:48 +, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I don't understand, what the Author (Michael Elkins) or the current > Maintainer of the upstream version (Thomas Roessler) have to do with > us (Debian) offering their program on our US ftp servers. I meant it'd be nice

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread john
Roland writes: > I don't understand, what the Author (Michael Elkins) ... Mr. Elkins should be innocent even by the standards of the anti-encryption kooks as long as he had nothing to do with the installation of the encryption hooks. > ...or the current Maintainer of the upstream version (Thomas

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some time ago (can't remember any version numbers) the PGP version > was hacked by Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> right after the > normal version came out. > Right now Michael Elkins has a job enslaving (sp?) him to use a > Mickeysoft OS any he do

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Alexander Koch
On Fri, 16 October 1998 20:38:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US resident (I don't use > mutt at all, myself). Some time ago (can't remember any version numbers) the PGP version was hacked by Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> right after the

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 08:38:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Steve Greenland writes: > > While I agree in principle, you might want to ask Michael Elkins first; > > it's conceivable that he could be brought into any litigation > > I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US residen

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread john
Steve Greenland writes: > While I agree in principle, you might want to ask Michael Elkins first; > it's conceivable that he could be brought into any litigation I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US resident (I don't use mutt at all, myself). > ...simply having to defend himself le

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-17 Thread Steve Greenland
On 15-Oct-98, 18:02 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Marc Singer writes: > > I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough > > to raise the hackles of the export hounds. > > Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to > raise the hackles of

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-15 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:02:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough > > to raise the hackles of the export hounds. > > Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to > raise the hackles of the expo

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-15 Thread john
Marc Singer writes: > I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough > to raise the hackles of the export hounds. Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to raise the hackles of the export kooks. Ihere has got to be some limit to the amount o

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-15 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:14:20PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > > Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main? > > There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and > > code to run pgp or gnupg. > > > > (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version > > t

Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-15 Thread Marc Singer
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main? > There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and > code to run pgp or gnupg. > > (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version > to main, I h

moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main? There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and code to run pgp or gnupg. (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version to main, I hope Brian will let it slip past the freeze, there are no other differences