On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I wonder if this was a case of the code not being sufficient
> > description? [IE, code and a good text description would be accepted,
> > but code only was not?]
>
> These packages were
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: Code in Description [Was: Re:
node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]"):
> These packages were rejected and their description is given below.
I agree with ftpmaster's decision in all of these cases.
In the case of node-is-obj and node-is
On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This is news to me. Policy §5.6.13 ('Description') doesn't explicitely
> forbid using code (or pseudocode), and even allows for verbatim lines
> (which start with two or more spaces).
>
> I wonder if this was a case of the code not
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Thanks for this description. I will try to write more description, but
> its not very easy always especially when you are not allowed to write
> sample code.
[...]
> When you are not allowed to write 2 lines of sample code when that is
> the best
On 02/10/2017 04:32 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വ്യാഴം 09 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 11:48 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> It doesn't matter that your package is small and that users won't normally
>> install it directly. It's still mandated that it includes a description, and
>> ftpmasters are only
On 10/02/2017 06:47, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:51 രാവിലെ, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Pirate Praveen writes:
>>> On വ്യാഴം 09 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 11:48 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Thanks for this description. I will try to write
On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:51 രാവിലെ, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Pirate Praveen writes:
>> On വ്യാഴം 09 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 11:48 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>>> It doesn't matter that your package is small and that users won't
>>> normally install it directly. It's
Pirate Praveen writes:
> On വ്യാഴം 09 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 11:48 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> It doesn't matter that your package is small and that users won't
>> normally install it directly. It's still mandated that it includes a
>> description, and ftpmasters are
On വ്യാഴം 09 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 11:48 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> It doesn't matter that your package is small and that users won't normally
> install it directly. It's still mandated that it includes a description, and
> ftpmasters are only doing their job.
That is like treating debian
On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 03:23 രാവിലെ, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Browserify takes code from npm (targetted at Node) and makes it run
> in the browser. Node comes with an API of its own that is not available
> in browsers. Browserify provides this code. There is nothing to patch
> since browserify
* Vincent Bernat [170209 16:54]:
> Browserify takes code from npm (targetted at Node) and makes it run
> in the browser. Node comes with an API of its own that is not available
> in browsers. Browserify provides this code. There is nothing to patch
> since browserify is not a
❦ 9 février 2017 22:23 +0100, Adam Borowski :
>> > "This module is a dependency for browserify." is already present in
>> > the description. And short description says "tty module from node core
>> > for browsers".
>>
>> Then again, they could try looking at the code,
(slightly trimmed To:/CC: -- no redundant copies please!)
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:55:25PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Pirate Praveen writes:
> > "This module is a dependency for browserify." is already present in
> > the description. And short description says "tty
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:18:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> PS: many thanks to the ftpmaster for doing a (so often) thankless job!
Indeed!
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Pirate Praveen writes:
...
> "This module is a dependency for browserify." is already present in
> the description. And short description says "tty module from node core
> for browsers".
That presumably makes sense to people that know what node is.
I'm somewhat aware
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 at 16:47:05 -, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> And short
> description says "tty module from node core for browsers".
Does this mean that this is a polyfill/compatibility shim for
running JavaScript designed for node.js in non-node.js environments
like browsers?
If so, I can't
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes
REJECTED"):
> Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> > I am sorry, but I don't understand why you module makes sense.
> > Please add a more detailed des
Hi,
On 09/02/17 17:47, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> I am sorry, but I don't understand why you module makes sense.
>> Please add a more detailed description to your debian/control.
>
> This is seriously becoming too much.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry, but I don't understand why you module makes sense.
> Please add a more detailed description to your debian/control.
This is seriously becoming too much. "This
19 matches
Mail list logo