Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 15:48:07) > Jonas Smedegaard writes: >> Do I understand you correctly that you recommend that we all tell our >> users - e.g. in release notes - something like this: "We acknowledge >> that the Nodejs included in this release is outdated, and

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Philip Hands
Jérémy Lal writes: > 2017-01-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Philip Hands : >> Jérémy Lal writes: >> >>> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > No answer

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Philip Hands
Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for looking into this! > > Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 12:53:10) >> Jérémy Lal writes: >> >> > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100,

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Jérémy Lal
2017-01-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Philip Hands : > Jérémy Lal writes: > >> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: No answer yet, people are busy, and the number of concerned

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Phil, Thanks for looking into this! Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 12:53:10) > Jérémy Lal writes: > > > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >>> i really think it would be

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-06 Thread Philip Hands
Jérémy Lal writes: > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. >>> That version is currently in experimental and

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2017-01-04 10:12:44) > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. >>> That version is currently in experimental

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. >> That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it >> to unstable, but

Re: nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. > That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it > to unstable, but i tried to do things right and prepared the addons > that need to be

nodejs 6.9 in unstable, manual transition, schedule

2017-01-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release. That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it to unstable, but i tried to do things right and prepared the addons that need to be rebuilt and binNMUed, then opened a transition bug #849505. No