On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:12:02PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Justin Pryzby]
> > In which case, should the shared libraries go into a separate package?
>
> I wouldn't bother unless there are multiple binary packages already
> which will require the library, and they don't already depend o
On Sep 12, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was originally sent to -mentors, but elicited no response, so I'm
> reposting here:
I agree with the answer by Peter Samuelson.
Most of the policy requirements about libraries are only relevant if
they are shared among non-cooperating pack
[Justin Pryzby]
> In which case, should the shared libraries go into a separate package?
I wouldn't bother unless there are multiple binary packages already
which will require the library, and they don't already depend on each
other. And this is probably a fairly rare case.
Basically, if there'
This was originally sent to -mentors, but elicited no response, so I'm
reposting here:
I actually had postponed a message about all these questions for some
6+ months now, while I tried to phrase the questions in a more useful
way. This thread caused me to regain interest. Hopefully someone
here
4 matches
Mail list logo