Re: openresolv vs. resolvconf

2010-12-01 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Thomas Hood jdth...@gmail.com wrote: I am interested in how openresolv stacks up against resolvconf. ... What further pros and cons do people see out there? Mh, having a quick glimpse at openresolv I doubt it is the drop-in replacement for resolvconf that it suggests to be (Provides/Conflicts:

openresolv vs. resolvconf

2010-11-30 Thread Thomas Hood
I am interested in how openresolv stacks up against resolvconf. For starters the openresolv home page conveniently compares[0] openresolv with resolvconf. * Works with POSIX shell and userland Nice. Resolvconf requires bash. But since resolvconf scripts are short, and bash is Essential in

Re: openresolv vs. resolvconf

2010-11-30 Thread Brian May
On 30 November 2010 22:57, Thomas Hood jdth...@gmail.com wrote: An important advantage of openresolv could be that it isn't, like resolvconf, undermaintained[1].  If openresolv is truly a drop-in replacement for resolvconf then migration from resolvconf to openresolv would be one way of