On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:55:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
> a bug since 2002, and most of these packages have probably not been
> updated since then, si
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:00:05PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Andrew Pollock
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:19:34AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > > Some of these packages have been orphaned, but have not yet had their
> > > maintainer fields switched to QA.
>
> > There's only
Scripsit Andrew Pollock
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:19:34AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Some of these packages have been orphaned, but have not yet had their
> > maintainer fields switched to QA.
> There's only 30 odd packages currently listed at
> http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html, and I
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:19:34AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> > contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/.
>
> Some of these packages have been orphaned, but
Joey Hess wrote:
>
>Please fix your packages. Filing bugs on nearly 500 packages is
>something I'd prefer not to do, but it might come to that. We've been
>working on this transition for 5 or 6 years now, and it's about time to
>finish it.
>Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> mimedecode
> m
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Please fix your packages. Filing bugs on nearly 500 packages is
> > something I'd prefer not to do
>
> Why do you have filled bug reports, then? Only for my packages?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=32281
Scripsit Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> I agree that it *should* be a bug, but I cannot see that it officially
>> *has* been one for three years.
> You're right. However, I think it's past time to change policy and make
> it a bug.
Agreed.
--
Henning Makholm "And h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Please fix your packages. Filing bugs on nearly 500 packages is
> something I'd prefer not to do
Why do you have filled bug reports, then? Only for my packages?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322813
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Henning Makholm wrote:
> > That's been a bug since 2002,
>
> Huh? The closest I can find in policy is a footnote reading:
>
> | At this phase of the transition, we no longer require a symbolic
> | link in /usr/doc/. At a later point, policy shall change to make the
> | symbolic links a bug.
>
>
On 15/08/05, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 00:49]:
> > The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> > contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
> > a bug since 2002, and most of thes
Hi,
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 00:49]:
> The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
> a bug since 2002, and most of these packages have probably not been
> updated since then, since
Scripsit Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/.
Some of these packages have been orphaned, but have not yet had their
maintainer fields switched to QA.
> That's been a bug
The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
a bug since 2002, and most of these packages have probably not been
updated since then, since recompiling most of them with a current
debhelper will remove t
13 matches
Mail list logo
