Hello Fellow Devs,
I am working on packaging the LIO tools [1]. The userspace component is
licensed under AGPL-3.
As per Debian bug #621462, the license is not part of common-licenses
because there aren't many consumers for it, yet.
I plan to document the license in the debian/copyright file and
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:28:26AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I am working on packaging the LIO tools [1]. The userspace component is
licensed under AGPL-3.
As per Debian bug #621462, the license is not part of common-licenses
because there
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 14:25 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
I personally consider 1000 packages to be the appropriate level for
considering including something new in common-licenses, but I'm fairly
conservative on that front. The closest (by far) of the licenses not
already listed there,
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:25:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Actually, based on the surveys I've done of licensing information, I
think it's unlikely that the AGPL will ever become that popular of a
license. I doubt it will even pass the GFDL,
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 14:25 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
I personally consider 1000 packages to be the appropriate level for
considering including something new in common-licenses, but I'm fairly
conservative on that front. The closest (by far)
5 matches
Mail list logo