packages under the AGPL-3 license

2011-09-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Fellow Devs, I am working on packaging the LIO tools [1]. The userspace component is licensed under AGPL-3. As per Debian bug #621462, the license is not part of common-licenses because there aren't many consumers for it, yet. I plan to document the license in the debian/copyright file and

Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license

2011-09-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:28:26AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: I am working on packaging the LIO tools [1]. The userspace component is licensed under AGPL-3. As per Debian bug #621462, the license is not part of common-licenses because there

Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license

2011-09-20 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 14:25 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery: I personally consider 1000 packages to be the appropriate level for considering including something new in common-licenses, but I'm fairly conservative on that front. The closest (by far) of the licenses not already listed there,

Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license

2011-09-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:25:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Actually, based on the surveys I've done of licensing information, I think it's unlikely that the AGPL will ever become that popular of a license. I doubt it will even pass the GFDL,

Re: packages under the AGPL-3 license

2011-09-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes: Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 14:25 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery: I personally consider 1000 packages to be the appropriate level for considering including something new in common-licenses, but I'm fairly conservative on that front. The closest (by far)