I have a package (debconf) that uses lib.pm. This is in perl-5.00[54]. It
depends on perl5. I just installed a fresh unstable system, using the
defaults. perl-5.004-base and perl-5.004 were installed, as was
perl-5.005-base. perl-5.005 itself was not installed. perl -v says perl
5.005 is being
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:27:00PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
I have a package (debconf) that uses lib.pm. This is in perl-5.00[54]. It
depends on perl5. I just installed a fresh unstable system, using the
defaults. perl-5.004-base and perl-5.004 were installed, as was
perl-5.005-base. perl-5.005
Anthony Towns wrote:
Huh? perl-5.005 is priority: important, and it doesn't seem to conflict
with anything else. How come it didn't get installed?
I dunno. I installed the base system from cd, went into dselect, selected
nothing that wasn't automatically selected, and installed, then went on to
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:28:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
Yick. Perhaps the alternative priorities could be arranged differently?
That doesn't address the real problem, which is that one version of perl may
be installed and satisfy the dependancy, while the alternatives system makes
another
Le Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:27:00PM -0700, Joey Hess écrivait:
What am I supposed to do? I could make debconf depend on perl-5.005, but it
really works with any version of perl 5. Also, if only perl-5.004-base,
perl-5.005, and perl-5.005-base were installed, and the alternatives pointed
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:27:00PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
What am I supposed to do? I could make debconf depend on perl-5.005, but it
really works with any version of perl 5. Also, if only perl-5.004-base,
perl-5.005, and perl-5.005-base were installed, and the alternatives pointed
6 matches
Mail list logo
