On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, Philip Hands wrote:
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recommends: ppp-pam
Recommends is for packages found together in all but unusual
sitations.
It's certainly not appropriate here. I wouldn't even use Suggests.
Just mention it in the
Hi,
It seems that the only file that needs to be changed between ppp with PAM, and
ppp without PAM is /usr/bin/pppd itself.
This being the case I thought I'd produce two packages, ppp ppp-pam.
ppp will contain the current setup, compiled without PAM support, and ppp-pam
will contain just
On Thu, Dec 18, 1997 at 12:17:43AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
This being the case I thought I'd produce two packages, ppp ppp-pam.
ppp will contain the current setup, compiled without PAM support, and ppp-pam
will contain just /usr/bin/pppd, and have preinst/postrm to handle diverting
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recommends: ppp-pam
Recommends is for packages found together in all but unusual
sitations.
It's certainly not appropriate here. I wouldn't even use Suggests.
Just mention it in the description.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recommends: ppp-pam
Recommends is for packages found together in all but unusual
sitations.
It's certainly not appropriate here. I wouldn't even use Suggests.
Just mention it in the description.
I've gone for Suggests in the package I just
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there an automatic way of setting the current version of a package into
the
Depends (a la ${shlibs:Depends}) ?
Not totally automatic, but you could probably do something in
debian/rules to sed (or, if you're me, perl) it out of the changelog,
and
6 matches
Mail list logo
