Accepted procps 2:4.0.4-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:15:10 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.4-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Changes: procps (2:4.0.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium

Accepted procps 2:4.0.4-3 (source) into experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 19:33:53 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.4-3 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 1059817 Changes: procps (2:4.0.4-3

Re: Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

On Nov 20, Craig Small wrote: > Also why is killall5 not a candidate too? Probably because it makes no sense outside of sysvinit, except that as a footgun. (Also, is it equivalent to pkill --inverse?) -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

seems a bit unnecessary to me, more so when this increases the > bootstrapping-set. I'd also rather see instead a _proper_ transition to > get sysvinit-utils out of the essential-set, and then at some later > point procps can take over pidof. > There really is two options then: 1) Switc

Re: New Essential package procps-base

Hi! On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 17:29:01 +1100, Craig Small wrote: > What: > Create a new package procps-base. This uses the existing procps source > package and just enable building of pidof. procps-base will be an Essential > package and only contain pidof. > > Why: > This

Re: New Essential package procps-base

On 14/11/23 11:11, Helmut Grohne wrote: I welcome the effort in general. Like Andreas, I question whether having pidof remain essential is useful. A quick codesearch https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%5Cbpidof%5Cb=0 suggests that we have less than 500 source packages that even mention it.

Re: New Essential package procps-base

in principle and if you do not want to take on the > non-essential part, I fear I see little alternatives to that procps-base > proposal. Yeah, let's not make this task impossibly huge and lengthy, please. Using the same implementation as every other distro has immediate benefits for everybody, p

Re: New Essential package procps-base

Hi Craig, On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > Hello, > For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about > changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A > quick scan of the various distributions shows that

Re: New Essential package procps-base

Hi, On 11/14/23 18:42, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Instead I think pidof can just be part of procps package. The sysvinit-utils package will then pull in procps via a dependency (once sysvinit-utils stops being Essential), which would smooth the transition for all sysvinit users until LSB

Re: New Essential package procps-base

Hello, On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > Hello, > For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about > changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A > quick scan of the various distributions shows that

New Essential package procps-base

Hello, For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian and Ubuntu (and I assume most other downstreams) use the sysvinit-utils version

Accepted procps 2:4.0.4-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:02:52 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 1052034 Changes: procps (2:4.0.4-2) unstable

Accepted procps 2:4.0.4-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 21:31:09 +1000 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 968711 1031765 1035649 1036631 1037450 1042887

Accepted procps 2:4.0.3-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:17:15 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 668580 1025915 1026326 1027963 1031343 Changes

Accepted procps 2:4.0.2-3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:06:38 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 192635 1025915 1026326 Changes: procps (2

Accepted procps 2:4.0.2-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 23:12:37 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 1025495 1025506 Changes: procps (2:4.0.2-2

Accepted procps 2:4.0.2-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:59:09 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Changes: procps (2:4.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-7.1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:38:33 +0200 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-7.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues Closes: 1020602 Changes

Accepted procps 2:4.0.1-1 (source) into experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:59:06 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:4.0.1-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Changes: procps (2:4.0.1-1) experimental; urgency

Accepted procps 2:4.0.1~rc3-1 (source amd64) into experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:22:07 +1100 Source: procps Binary: libproc2-0 libproc2-0-dbgsym libproc2-dev procps procps-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:4.0.1~rc3-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig

Accepted procps 2:4.0.0-1 (source amd64) into experimental, experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:12:54 +1100 Source: procps Binary: libproc-2-0 libproc-2-0-dbgsym libproc-2-dev procps procps-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:4.0.0-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-7 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 22:05:15 +1100 Source: procps Binary: libprocps-dev libprocps8 libprocps8-dbgsym procps procps-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.17-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-6 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:46:59 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 987557 991151 1000908 Changes: procps (2

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-5 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:17:53 +1000 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 986276 Changes: procps (2:3.3.17-5) unstable

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:50:26 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 982803 Changes: procps (2:3.3.17-4) unstable

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:57:10 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 982437 982440 982566 Changes: procps (2

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:49:00 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 974459 982391 982437 Changes: procps (2

Accepted procps 2:3.3.17-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:50:10 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.17-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 950788 951335 951550 Changes: procps (2

Accepted procps 2:3.3.16-5 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 09:45:41 +1000 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.16-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 960810 Changes: procps (2:3.3.16-5) unstable

Accepted procps 2:3.3.16-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:52:38 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.16-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 951293 Changes: procps (2:3.3.16-4) unstable

Accepted procps 2:3.3.16-3 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:05:44 +1100 Source: procps Binary: libprocps-dev libprocps8 libprocps8-dbgsym procps procps-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.16-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small

Accepted procps 2:3.3.16-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:08:40 +1100 Source: procps Architecture: source Version: 2:3.3.16-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small Closes: 951335 951494 Changes: procps (2:3.3.16-2

Accepted procps 2:3.3.16-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:05:09 +1100 Source: procps Binary: libprocps-dev libprocps8 libprocps8-dbgsym procps procps-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.16-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small

Accepted procps 2:3.3.15-2 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 19:42:46 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps7 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.15-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small Changed-By: Craig Small

Accepted procps 2:3.3.15-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 19:41:46 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps7 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.15-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.14-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:49:54 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.13-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:12:50 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.13-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.12-4 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:59:11 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.12-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.12-3 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:04:54 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.12-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.12-2 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:20:48 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.12-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.12-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:39:28 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps6 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.11-3 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 17:10:26 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps5 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.11-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.10-4 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 08:55:49 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps4 libprocps4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.10-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.10-3 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:50:00 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps4 libprocps4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.10-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> C

Accepted procps 2:3.3.11-2 (source amd64) into experimental, experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:38:47 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps5 libprocps-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.11-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 2:3.3.10-2 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:00:30 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps4 libprocps4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 2:3.3.10-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 23:05:21 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps4 libprocps4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.10-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 2:3.3.9-9 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 08:11:15 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.9-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Bug#779258: ITP: golang-procps -- Golang library to retrieve metrics from the proc pseudo-filesystem

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org * Package name: golang-procps Version : 0+git20150225.6c34ef8 Upstream Author : The Prometheus Authors * URL : https://github.com/prometheus/procfs/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming

Accepted procps 2:3.3.9-8 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:44:44 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2:3.3.9-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.10-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:37:52 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps4 libprocps4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.10-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-7 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:47:30 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-6 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 00:16:17 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-5 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:00:01 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-4 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:11:29 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. There doesn't seem to be a publically available i386 Debian machine that supports building packages. This makes it nearly impossible to support that architecture

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

Craig Small csm...@debian.org (2014-02-25): I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1], but anyhow. 1

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org, 2014-02-24, 23:16: I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps. First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow. #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org (2014-02-24): I just hope you didn't mean to say that only perfect bug reports are welcome these days, and those merely good are somehow frowned upon. No, I wasn't sure what Craig was not sure about, that's why I tried to connect the dots with the usual FTBFS bug

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:06:56AM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote: No, I wasn't sure what Craig was not sure about, that's why I tried to connect the dots with the usual FTBFS bug reports developers might be (more?) familiar with. You guessed right, I understood what you meant and got a way

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:16:23 -0500 (EST), Cyril Brulebois wrote: #739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS), and could have linked to [1], but anyhow. 1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=procpssuite=sid I apologize, Mr. Brulebois, if I did not use

Re: Bug #739874 - procps doesn't build on i386

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: and extracted with dpkg-source. In other words, on my machine at least, I did not get a FTBFS error. It looks like its something strange on that particular pbuilder. The problem is that barriere is even stranger and the programs

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-3 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:11:50 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-2 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:24:15 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed-By: Craig

Accepted procps 1:3.3.9-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:56:39 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps3 libprocps3-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

either way (that's my read of it anyhow). What I have done is used the --disable-pidof flag in procps configure step. This means procps does *not* have pidof and it can remain in sysvinit-tools for the time being. If the upstream decides to move it, we'll work out what to do then. - Craig -- Craig

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

no plans moving pidof though they don't seem terribly fussed either way (that's my read of it anyhow). What I have done is used the --disable-pidof flag in procps configure step. This means procps does *not* have pidof and it can remain in sysvinit-tools for the time being. If the upstream

Re: procps with pidof is released

On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Steve Langasek dixit: (For values of permanently that include we now have two implementations of sh in Essential, because no one has done the work to let

Re: procps with pidof is released

On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Steve Langasek dixit: (For values of permanently that include we now have two implementations

Re: procps with pidof is released

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Steve Langasek dixit: (For

Re: procps with pidof is released

On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 11:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM

Re: procps with pidof is released

Steve Langasek dixit: (For values of permanently that include we now have two implementations of sh in Essential, because no one has done the work to let us get rid of bash.) Maybe because the offered alternative sucks so much. I’d happily split mksh into mksh and mksh-static, make the latter

Re: procps with pidof is released

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Steve Langasek dixit: (For values of permanently that include we now have two implementations of sh in Essential, because no one has done the work to let us get rid of bash.) Maybe because the offered alternative sucks so

Re: dpkg with new Essential (Was: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps)

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:56:57PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly. procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be Essential: yes Breaks: sysvinit-utils

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

drop pidof? Yes, and the man page too. Will procps-base be guaranteed to be installed via upgrade? Now this I am unsure. It will be Essential but do new Essential packages automatically get installed? I imagine we'll have to also have a depends on procps-base = 3.3.9-1 to ensure pidof

Re: dpkg with new Essential (Was: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps)

procps-base, the Pre-Depends-Breaks relationship makes it impossible for That makes sense actually. Install procps-base first, the Replaces lets it replace pidof Install new sysvinit-utils, it pre-depends on procps-base so pidof is there. It's not critical that the new procps-base gets installed

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] AIUI, you've also proposed including the following list of binaries in procps-base: procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill Currently, the *only* one of these which is used as part of the essential set is pidof

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:03:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Discussed here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/185723/focus=185725 That's the leaving side, the arriving side is. http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/Adopting-pidof-from-sysvinittools Not sure what

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

the rewrite of pidof is something that we want to pick up, but the rationale for including it in the procps package doesn't apply to Debian at all. Right, can someone go and ask the sysvinit-utils or sysvinit-tools upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:03:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] AIUI, you've also proposed including the following list of binaries in procps-base: procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill Currently, the *only

dpkg with new Essential (Was: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps)

As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly. procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be Essential: yes Breaks: sysvinit-utils 2.88dsf-43 Now, if there is a new Essential package

Re: dpkg with new Essential (Was: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps)

On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:56 +1100, Craig Small wrote: As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly. procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be Essential: yes Breaks: sysvinit-utils

Re: dpkg with new Essential (Was: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps)

Hello, 2013-12-09 03:55, Ben Hutchings: On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:56 +1100, Craig Small wrote: As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly. procps-base will contain the new pidof

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:01:33AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: my first cut of it would be: procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill procps: pwdx, vmstat, tload, free, pmap, skill, slabtop, top, uptime, watch, w, snice procps-base is Essential and depends on libc6, libncurses

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:28:47AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:39:20PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: I also wonder whether it would not be more sensible to split procps into essential and non-essential binary packages. Aside from pidof, I bet there are lots

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:46:26PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote: Since we are talking about pidof, I'd like to note that pgrep is more portable ;-) They'll actually share some of the same codebase after this change. pidof is bascially a cut-down pgrep. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:14:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: And is there a strong reason why we don't move whole procps into essential?A It used to be there and then it was decided it wasn't essential. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

, the results are: -c: corosync, glusterfs and sheepdog -n: no packages -m: not available on Debian pidof I also wonder whether it would not be more sensible to split procps into essential and non-essential binary packages. Aside from pidof, I bet there are lots of scripts using pkill, pgrep

pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new home for pidof so it fits with similiar tools (pidof used to be in procps in the dark ages). This means shortly that pidof will disappear from sysvinit

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote: Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new home for pidof so it fits with similiar tools (pidof used to be in procps in the dark ages

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 14:21 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Le 9 août 2013 13:39, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk a écrit : On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote: Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

Le 9 août 2013 13:39, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk a écrit : On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote: Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new home for pidof so it fits

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

Since we are talking about pidof, I'd like to note that pgrep is more portable ;-) 2013/8/9, Craig Small csm...@debian.org: Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new home for pidof so it fits

Re: pidof changing from sysvinit-devel to procps

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote: Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new home for pidof so

Accepted procps 1:3.3.8-2 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:10:37 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed-By: Craig

Accepted procps 1:3.3.8-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:25:22 +1000 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed-By: Craig

Accepted procps 1:3.3.6-2 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:09:45 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.6-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.6-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:47:29 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed-By: Craig

Accepted procps 1:3.3.7-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:11:49 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.7-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed

Accepted procps 1:3.3.5-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:24:51 +1100 Source: procps Binary: procps libprocps1 libprocps1-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:3.3.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Craig Small csm...@debian.org Changed-By: Craig

  1   2   3   >