martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear colleagues,
I am starting to write netconf [0], finally. Or rather, I would if
I could settle on a language. If netconf is ever going to replace
ifupdown, it would need to have a low footprint and few
dependencies. This clearly suggests C/C++
On 2007-05-31 08:13, Oleg Verych wrote:
I like shell PITAs. At least it will start to run everywhere by
`/bin/sh' (dash, busybox, bash, zsh, whatever :)
How do you implement control sockets or listen on the netlink socket
with shell? Do you want to tail 'ip monitor'? Even if, how do you do
On 2007-05-31 08:13, Oleg Verych wrote:
I like shell PITAs. At least it will start to run everywhere by
`/bin/sh' (dash, busybox, bash, zsh, whatever :)
How do you implement control sockets or listen on the netlink socket
with shell? Do you want to tail 'ip monitor'? Even if, how do you do
also sprach Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.31.0011 +0200]:
Configuration of interfaces (hardware or software) is part of OS
setup and proper operation. And this task must be solved on the
principle basis, rather than jet-another-lang-flame. Once you have
all kernel/network-interfaces
also sprach Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.31.0021 +0200]:
I think its entirely viable. boost::python is rather nice and should
allow incremental migration. You could if you care start with a C++
wrapper using boost:python where all the guts are in python, and then
its just a
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:50:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
[]
The methods, which are the actual workers doing the configuring will
most certainly be implemented in shell.
Then call me !
I like shell PITAs. At least it will start to run everywhere by `/bin/sh'
(dash, busybox, bash, zsh,
also sprach Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.31.1013 +0200]:
Then call me !
Do you have a POSIX-compatible solution to the problem of setting
variables inside while loops?
See http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.05.29-shell-sucks
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:34:10PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency to mockup a
* From: martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:37:54 +0200
* Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
also sprach Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.31.1013 +0200]:
Then call me !
Do you have a POSIX-compatible solution to the problem of setting
variables inside while loops?
Dear colleagues,
I am starting to write netconf [0], finally. Or rather, I would if
I could settle on a language. If netconf is ever going to replace
ifupdown, it would need to have a low footprint and few
dependencies. This clearly suggests C/C++ as the language of choice.
0.
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:34:10 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:34, martin f krafft wrote:
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency to mockup a new
also sprach Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.30.1816 +0200]:
Planning to write the application twice seems to me to presume
more time and continued enthusiasm than is perhaps realistic,
especially since your plans seem fairly ambitious---having to slog
through the last 10% of the
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:34 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Dear colleagues,
...
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency to mockup a new application in Python first?
Planning to write the
15 matches
Mail list logo
