Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-27 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 01:32:16PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Nov 23, 2012, at 03:06 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it? I think there are a lot of good reasons to do source-only uploads, even when you should be building locally

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-25 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 23, 2012, at 03:06 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it? I think there are a lot of good reasons to do source-only uploads, even when you should be building locally for testing purposes. * Reproducibility - buildds provide a more

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-23 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Didier Raboud dijo [Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100]: I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a source-only upload. Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement? Both. I'd argue that it's a bug in both. BTW, can we have this as a

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or all (as in arch:any) packages on buildds. Are there any reasons to not built arch:all on buildds aside from technical problems? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-22 Thread YunQiang Su
you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it? On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or all (as

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:06:22PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it? How is that related to my question? Also, please don't top-post and dont send me copies. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:

release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 20. November 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a source-only upload. Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement? Both. I'd argue that it's a bug in both. BTW, can we have this as a release

Re: release goal for jessie! (Re: Source-only uploads (was: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED)

2012-11-21 Thread Didier Raboud
Le mercredi, 21 novembre 2012 20.59:02, Holger Levsen a écrit : Hi, On Dienstag, 20. November 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a source-only upload. Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement? Both.