Re: required formats for tetex (was Re: Bug#27447: tetex-base: new upstream version available)

1998-10-11 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > So, which formats do you consider to be important for the defaults? This is my preference: All packages that install TeX formats (including tetex-*), do in postinst a 'fmtutil -byfmt blah' for every format they include. Ideally t

Re: required formats for tetex (was Re: Bug#27447: tetex-base: new upstream version available)

1998-10-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hello, On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho writes: > > > > * The new fmtutil has a config file (fmtutil.cnf) that controls which > >formats get remade with 'texconfig init' (which is now equivalent to > >'fmtutil --all'). The d

required formats for tetex (was Re: Bug#27447: tetex-base: new upstream version available)

1998-10-11 Thread Christoph Martin
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho writes: > > * The new fmtutil has a config file (fmtutil.cnf) that controls which >formats get remade with 'texconfig init' (which is now equivalent to >'fmtutil --all'). The defaults are hyperconservative IMO (eg. no >pdf*tex or amstex formats are made).