On 07/28/14 11:38, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> I don't currently use the network-manager strongSwan plugin but that's
> mostly because it doesn't work.
AFAICT it didn't work due to #741415.
Today its broken again. It says
Could not find VPN plugin service for
'org.freedesktop.
On mer., 2014-07-16 at 15:08 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:40:13PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Since you seem to know the software well, and it is important for you,
> > perhaps you can take over maintainence of the package? The current
> > maintainer doesn't seem to
On 07/17/2014 06:40 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
>> really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
>> doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
> really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
> doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and I believe
> that's mandatory, right?). Not comment
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> To try to kill your frustration, I have sponsored the upload of your fix
> to the delayed/10 queue. If everything goes well, then in 15 days,
> network-manager-strongswan will be back in Jessie.
>
Thanx very much for your help
Regards
Harri
--
To
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Especially if the NMU is properly done (eg documented in the BTS, uploaded
> > to
> > DELAYED-foo, etc) I've hardly seen any complaints in recent years.
> Surely I could have done better in providing a "clean"
> fix to #741415, making
On 2014-07-16, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
> really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
If you use cdbs' debhelper module (which runs the various dh_foo
commands), you need to ensure debhelper is availa
On 07/16/2014 10:06 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 07/16/14 15:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>> Especially if the NMU is properly done (eg documented in the BTS, uploaded
>> to
>> DELAYED-foo, etc) I've hardly seen any complaints in recent years.
>>
>
> Surely I could have done better in providing
Hi Riku, Holger,
Holger Levsen (2014-07-16):
> On Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > This a side-effect from Debian's policy that discourages fixing bugs in
> > other maintainers packages via NMUs. Somehow, it is felt better to
> > remove packages from testing than possibly offending
On 07/16/14 15:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> Especially if the NMU is properly done (eg documented in the BTS, uploaded to
> DELAYED-foo, etc) I've hardly seen any complaints in recent years.
>
Surely I could have done better in providing a "clean"
fix to #741415, making it more easy for the Deb
Hi Riku,
On Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014, Riku Voipio wrote:
> This a side-effect from Debian's policy that discourages fixing bugs in
> other maintainers packages via NMUs. Somehow, it is felt better to
> remove packages from testing than possibly offending the maintainer with
> an unwarranted NMU.
H
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:40:13PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Since you seem to know the software well, and it is important for you,
> perhaps you can take over maintainence of the package? The current
> maintainer doesn't seem to be active (no upload since 2012..).
> Alternatively the package cou
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:05:26PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Thijs,
> On 07/16/14 12:35, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > As it turns out, this package got removed because it has an unfixed
> > release critical bug (which interestingly enough you yourself reported).
> > When this bug is fixed, t
Hi Simon,
On 07/16/14 12:36, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> If the change you proposed works correctly, an NMU seems appropriate.
>
I am using the fix in a private package since I
created the bug report. Seems to work fine (using
strongswan 5.x).
I have appended a diff to the bug report. Hope
this
On Wed, July 16, 2014 13:05, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 07/16/14 12:35, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> As it turns out, this package got removed because it has an unfixed
>> release critical bug (which interestingly enough you yourself reported).
>> When this bug is fixed, the package will transition bac
Hi Thijs,
On 07/16/14 12:35, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> As it turns out, this package got removed because it has an unfixed
> release critical bug (which interestingly enough you yourself reported).
> When this bug is fixed, the package will transition back to testing.
>
Of course I know that I
On 16/07/14 11:17, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> how comes that network-manager-strongswan has been dropped
> from testing?
https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/network-manager-strongswan.html says:
network-manager-strongswan (source, i386, amd64, armel, armhf, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390x) has new bugs!
Up
On Wed, July 16, 2014 12:17, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> how comes that network-manager-strongswan has been dropped
> from testing? This package is extremely important for road-
> warrior setups using IPsec.
You can find that out for any package on the PTS:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/network-mana
Hi folks,
how comes that network-manager-strongswan has been dropped
from testing? This package is extremely important for road-
warrior setups using IPsec.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
19 matches
Mail list logo
