Re: sid on openvz

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The minimum required version in the glibc is something configurable at > build time (to some extents, the absolute minimum is 2.6.32 for glibc > 2.21). This configure how much compatibility glue is used to workaround > the missing

Re: sid on openvz

> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes: AJ> If you consider Debian "stable" as too archaic, I am missing words to AJ> qualify a 2.6.32 kernel released in 2009. Prehistoric maybe? Indeed, but we don't have any choice there. And it isn't Linus' 2.6.32, its openvz's port of

Re: sid on openvz

On Dec 07, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Have there also backported recent glibc or systemd to these systems and > do they support such a configuration? This is what we are talking about > here. The *hosts* still use Centos 6, but so far more recent guests releases, even using

Re: sid on openvz

On 7 December 2015 at 14:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 07, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> Have there also backported recent glibc or systemd to these systems and >> do they support such a configuration? This is what we are talking about >> here. > The *hosts*

Re: sid on openvz

On 2015-12-05 08:33, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 03, James Cloos wrote: > > > Most openvz run on kernels based on 2.6.32, often with significant > > updates. These platforms are an important segment, given how affordable > > they are. And Debian "stable" is often too

Re: sid on openvz

On 2015-12-03 17:33, James Cloos wrote: > The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) > openvz platforms because it requires a newer kernel version that most > openvz vendors advertize. > > Most openvz run on kernels based on 2.6.32, often with significant > updates.

Re: sid on openvz

> Is it possible for these vendors to switch to a newer version of Linux? A new version of OpenVZ based on the RHEL 7 kernel (3.10) is being developed but isn't expected soon unfortunately. This led the Proxmox team to replace OpenVZ with LXC for its containers. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: sid on openvz

Le 04/12/2015 07:06, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, James Cloos wrote: > >> The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) >> openvz platforms because it requires a newer kernel version that most >> openvz vendors advertize. > > Is it possible for

Re: sid on openvz

Hi Aurélien, On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2015-12-03 17:33, James Cloos wrote: > > The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) > > openvz platforms because it requires a newer kernel version that most > > openvz vendors advertize.

Re: sid on openvz

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 14:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Aurélien, > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2015-12-03 17:33, James Cloos wrote: > > > The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) > > > openvz platforms because it

Re: sid on openvz

On Dec 03, James Cloos wrote: > Most openvz run on kernels based on 2.6.32, often with significant > updates. These platforms are an important segment, given how affordable > they are. And Debian "stable" is often too archaic for many needs which > fit nicely on a small

Re: sid on openvz

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, James Cloos wrote: > The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) > openvz platforms because it requires a newer kernel version that most > openvz vendors advertize. Is it possible for these vendors to switch to a newer version of Linux?

sid on openvz

The latest glibc update breaks most sid installs on (typically leased) openvz platforms because it requires a newer kernel version that most openvz vendors advertize. Most openvz run on kernels based on 2.6.32, often with significant updates. These platforms are an important segment, given how