On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:04:03PM +0200, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
istr the same thing, and was thinking that this might be the case.
since i don't suppose the ftp-master __ are going to come out
of hiding just to answer this question, i guess i'll upload, find out,
and
El Sábado 26 Febrero 2005 21:47, sean finney escribió:
istr the same thing, and was thinking that this might be the case.
since i don't suppose the ftp-master illuminati are going to come out
of hiding just to answer this question, i guess i'll upload, find out,
and report back :/
sean
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:47:51PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:18:19PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
I seem to recall hearing that NEW processing is based solely on binary
packages, so that the new source package would not need to go through NEW
if it creates a
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:29:09AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Given that some people might find offensive to be compared to
illuminati, I don't think this is the best way to engage the ftp-master.
YMMV.
perhaps i should have made it a bit more apparent that my tongue was
slightly in-cheek
On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:45, sean finney wrote:
so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
respective tarballs (and i'm not sure why they weren't in the first
place). however, one thing that's not clear to me is whether or not the
new second source package
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:56:29 +0100, David Schmitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:45, sean finney wrote:
so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
respective tarballs (and i'm not sure why they weren't in the first
place). however, one thing
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
hi,
i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
author, same website, but different tarball and versioning scheme)
tarball.
so i'm
El sb, 26-02-2005 a las 14:18 -0500, Josh Metzler escribi:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
hi,
i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
author, same website,
hi josh,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:18:19PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
I seem to recall hearing that NEW processing is based solely on binary
packages, so that the new source package would not need to go through NEW
if it creates a binary package that is already in the archive.
I couldn't
hi,
i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages. however,
one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same author,
same website, but different tarball and versioning scheme) tarball.
so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
10 matches
Mail list logo
