On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote:
?? ??, 14/06/2005 ?? 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ??:
There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package,
and architecture independent to data package.
I consider some common
How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which
files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one?
Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions?
--
Sergey Fedoseev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:35:36PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote:
How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which
files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one?
Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions?
There's only one rule.
, 14/06/2005 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo :
There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package,
and architecture independent to data package.
I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones
move manpage to binary package and others move
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote:
There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package,
and architecture independent to data package.
I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones
move manpage to binary package
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo schrieb am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 um 18:02:06 +0200:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote:
There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package,
and architecture independent to data package.
I consider some common
6 matches
Mail list logo
