On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:57, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This really makes unstable snapshotting, or building stable once it's
released as Anthony has also suggested in this thread, look like much
better options than trying to build out of testing.
Scripsit David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:57, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This really makes unstable snapshotting, or building stable once it's
released as Anthony has also suggested in this thread, look like much
better
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 17:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:57, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This really makes unstable snapshotting, or building stable once it's
released as Anthony
Scripsit David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 17:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a arch can show that it is able to support a
high-quality-Debian-stable as we all know and love, it can be
promoted to tier-1.
Um, isn't the
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 17:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
Last but not least, nobody can prohibit you from assembling a
package pool for $tier-2-arch which mostly resembles Debian/stable
tier-1.
Of course. But they _are_ saying that if I do it, it has
5 matches
Mail list logo
