stable executable names

2003-11-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
, then CAN'T RUN FIREBIRD any more (only mozilla traditional comes up, alongside (earlier) firebird windows!!!). What the hell is going on? And shouldn't we have stable executable names? If the menu system wants a standard name, shouldn't it use /etc/alternatives, or a generic name, like www-browser

Re: stable executable names

2003-11-05 Thread Cameron Patrick
on it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=216264 Apparently it has been fixed upstream. | And shouldn't we have stable executable names? The executable names are fine, as far as I can see (mozilla = Mozilla, mozilla-firebird = Mozilla Firebird). Is the strange behaviour

Re: stable executable names

2003-11-05 Thread Patrick Caulfield
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:05:44PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:47:29PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: | Now, what's finally got to me one too many times: | * I run firebird then can't run mozilla. | * I run mozilla then can't run firebird. I've also noticed