On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:06:28PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
Hello,
I've recently started to use svn for package maintenance, both in order to
enable team maintenance and because it's a great way to keep track of the
code.
Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:18:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I replicate the advantages of quilt by keeping quilt patches in
Subversion. This allows me to use svn-inject -o, which doesn't put
the upstream sources in version control at all - just the Debian
directory.
I like this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto C. Sanchez) writes:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:18:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I replicate the advantages of quilt by keeping quilt patches in
Subversion. This allows me to use svn-inject -o, which doesn't put
the upstream sources in version control at
Hello,
I've recently started to use svn for package maintenance, both in order to
enable team maintenance and because it's a great way to keep track of the
code.
Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes. However with svn
(or any other version control system) it really doesn't
also sprach Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.23.1206 +0100]:
Previously I used dpatch or quilt for the Debian changes. However
with svn (or any other version control system) it really doesn't
make sense to use that. The VCS is great at keeping track of
changesets.
Is it? Try keeping
martin f krafft wrote:
Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
layout. Something like that could work here as well.
SVN does not track merges across branches, unless you do it in the
changelog.
Hi,
SVN does not track merges across branches, unless you do it in the
changelog.
I know, it's a pain in the neck. But still it's a good step forward over
CVS, and seems to be quite popular in Debian. I hope svn will improve in
this area.
svn/cvs et cetera are quite linear; dpatch and
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
layout. Something like that could work here as well.
SVN does
On Sunday 23 July 2006 20:28, John Goerzen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Well, ideally the support tool should not impose on the structure
Yes, svn-buildpackage is quite nice since it's easy to tell it about your
layout.
9 matches
Mail list logo
