Re: udevil (package) recommends udisks2?

On 10.05.2022 at 14:06 +0200, Jaime wrote: According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil recommends udisks2. Two questions: 1) Why? 2) What willI I lose by having udevil *without* udisks2? Many thanks, J Hello, I think adding the maintainer as CC to this message was

Re: udevil (package) recommends udisks2?

[such questions are probably better directed at debian-user] Am 10.05.22 um 14:46 schrieb Jaime: On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 13:06, Jaime wrote: According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil recommends udisks2. I've also just realised that udisks2 is not mentioned anywhere in

Re: udevil (package) recommends udisks2?

On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 13:06, Jaime wrote: > According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil > recommends udisks2. I've also just realised that udisks2 is not mentioned anywhere in the upstream build instructions: https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/udevil/blob/master/README

udevil (package) recommends udisks2?

According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil recommends udisks2. Two questions: 1) Why? 2) What willI I lose by having udevil *without* udisks2? Many thanks, J