Re: use flags? (was: Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?)

2011-08-15 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com) [110815 12:27]: > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > >Source: fbreader > >Build-Depends-Core: debhelper (>= 7), libbz2-dev > >Build-Depends-Qt3: libqt3-mt-dev > >Build-Depends-Qt4: libqt4-dev > >Build-Depends-Gtk2: libgtk2.0-dev > I can see this turning into a large m

Re: use flags? (was: Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?)

2011-08-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > >If we accept the idea there's now more than one way to build the >package, I would like us do not limit the number of ways to '2' but >rather extend the prospoal to set up something similar to Gentoo's USE >flags. The advantages of that idea: > >- porters/buildds/loca

Re: use flags? (was: Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?)

2011-08-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Eugene V. Lyubimkin (jac...@debian.org) [110813 14:58]: > On 2011-08-13 13:28, Andreas Barth wrote: > > Building with core Dependencies only > > > > If doing an build of the core functionality only, norecommends is > > added to the environment DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This is the signal for > > dpkg-b

use flags? (was: Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?)

2011-08-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
On 2011-08-13 13:28, Andreas Barth wrote: > Building with core Dependencies only > > If doing an build of the core functionality only, norecommends is > added to the environment DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This is the signal for > dpkg-buildpackage etc to only check for the minimal set of packages, > and f