Hi, Sam Hocevar wrote:
(statically linked for performance reasons, rotfl)
Well, when the glibc people had this discussion (the switch to ELF), the
performance penalty was found to be on the order of 5%.
I don't know whether modern CPUs' register aliasing hardware changes that
number.
Whether
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:18:22AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Sam Hocevar wrote:
(statically linked for performance reasons, rotfl)
Well, when the glibc people had this discussion (the switch to ELF), the
performance penalty was found to be on the order of 5%.
I don't know
Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:18:22AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Well, when the glibc people had this discussion (the switch to ELF),
the performance penalty was found to be on the order of 5%.
... by testing with somewhat typical programs.
I don't know whether
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:18:22AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Well, when the glibc people had this discussion (the switch to ELF),
the performance penalty was found to be on the order of 5%.
well, I changed my mind
a packaging of mplayer 0.90 is available at
deb http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/ ./
we asked for someone on debian-legal to scrutinize it and say if the
work we did is enough to let this package in Debian
it has also been uploaded to the queue (in case an ftp-installer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
we asked for someone on debian-legal to scrutinize it and say if the
work we did is enough to let this package in Debian
The MPlayer tree contains an almost verbatim copy of libdvdcss
(statically linked for performance reasons, rotfl) and a copy
hi
I just want to say that some time ago Dariush Pietrzak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I decided to package mplayer
when we uploaded for the first time, the ftp-installer had some (good)
reasons not to accept it
so we went into it and tried to clear all possible problems
w.r.t. DFSG: we sent e-mails
Hello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
*SNIP*
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply 'mplayer is new, please wait' that is
sent on upload of a new
Hi A Mennucc1,
I just want to say that some time ago Dariush Pietrzak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I decided to package mplayer
when we uploaded for the first time, the ftp-installer had some (good)
reasons not to accept it
so we went into it and tried to clear all possible problems w.r.t.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply 'mplayer is new, please wait' that is
sent on upload of a new package)
If
hello
I had actually asked for help on debian-legal, in
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00173.html
In our packaging of mplayer there is a file debian/README.Debian.2
that explain our study on the source of mplayer;
and indeed in the e-mail [1] I clearly
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:49:46PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
In our packaging of mplayer there is a file debian/README.Debian.2
that explain our study on the source of mplayer; and indeed in the
e-mail [1] I clearly ask:
debian-legal: please read debian/README.Debian.2 in the source; do
you think that it
[NB: I'm subscribed to -devel, no need to Cc: me.]
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
actually: the issue of J.U. is more about packaging than legal;
This is true.
on the issue about mpeg2dec... from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00231.html
I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:45:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
Junichi Uekawa asked for the contents of README.Debian.2 to go in
debian/copyright, where it belongs.
I asked about the mpeg2dec issue, as it wasn't included in the list of
files with
Hi A Mennucc1,
I had actually asked for help on debian-legal, in
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00173.html
This and the follow-ups you have now received are great. It must be very
frustrating when so much time goes by that someone like myself misses
16 matches
Mail list logo
