On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
(More than a
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:43:33AM +0100, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I think that is a shortcomming of apt though.
apt-get install foo=1.2-3
will fetch foo 1.2-3 from whatever repository that has that
version. But with
Package: foo
Version: 1.2-3
Depends: bar (= 1.2-3)
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I think that is a shortcomming of apt though.
apt-get install foo=1.2-3
will fetch foo 1.2-3 from whatever repository that has that
version. But with
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Actually, sbuild uses plain apt-get and apt-cache to handle build deps
these days; so if apt can handle a dependency, then so can sbuild.
The problem really is the fact that experimental has 'NoAuto: yes' (or
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I think that is a shortcomming of apt though.
apt-get install foo=1.2-3
will fetch foo 1.2-3 from whatever repository that has that
version. But with
Package: foo
Version: 1.2-3
Depends: bar (= 1.2-3)
apt-get will NOT fetch bar 1.2-3 unless
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:20:19AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
I would assume 10 days is enough to automatically build all that
is in experimental...
Some packages can not be autobuilt due to complex dependencies across
unstable and experimental.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Actually, sbuild uses plain apt-get and apt-cache to handle build deps
these days; so if apt can handle a dependency, then so can sbuild.
The problem really is the fact that experimental has 'NoAuto: yes' (or
what is it again) set in its Release
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
I would assume 10 days is enough to automatically build all that
is in experimental...
Some packages can not be autobuilt due to complex dependencies across
unstable and experimental. AFAIK, sbuild is not designed to work from
multiple APT sources,
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
(More than a few days later, it seems like still nothing is
happening...)
i can see a couple of logs signed
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 10:06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
(More than a few days later, it seems like
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
All packages that can be autobuilt on i386 have been autobuilt, and that
was finished more than a week ago. But nice to hear that nothing has
happened.
The original poster certainly was not aware of the experimental.debian.net
site. I have
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
I heard several times people claim
Hi,
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
amd64, there's a lot of
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ?
There was
Hi,
As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ?
Cheers
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 19:01:31 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
there any x86 autobuilder set
18 matches
Mail list logo
