On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:56:04 +0100
Thomas Labourdette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:34:07PM +0100, Michel Grentzinger écrivait:
Je ne connais pas les détails de l'affaire mais j'ai rapidement
regardé dans les bogues et aucun n'y fait référence.
C'est le bogue 175377
( Http://Www.9394club.Com )
.
( Http://Www.9394club.Com )
.
.QQ.()
600.
:QQ403734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13352832393()
---
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Fri, Nov 07 2003, 09:58:57PM]:
Out of those 19 kernel-image-* packages and more kernel-module*
packages, how many would go away with your proposal?
All but two: linux and linux-2.4 (which are actualy the same thing. I.e:
installing one will bring the
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Then how do you suggest maintaining a kernel 2.4.20 for one
architecture and a 2.4.22 for another architecture,
that's bogus to start with..
Hello.
I've read (a part of) resent kernel ITP flamewar.
The more I read, the more it frightens me.
Seems that someone without any sort of complete knowledge of the problem,
decided to maintain one of the most important parts of the system. And the
way he chooses is removing everything that I
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:39:38AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
At least, the ability to do
apt-get source linux
as it should always have been.
I think it's time we put an end to this euphemism called the kernel
and
On Saturday 08 November 2003 00:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Then how do you suggest maintaining a kernel 2.4.20 for one
architecture and a 2.4.22 for another architecture, when you can't even
test on either of them? And
#include hallo.h
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:39:58PM]:
Optimization is a serious issue too. Unlike most user space software, using
386 kernel on modern PC will cause serious performance loose. Especially if
you consider mmx/sse/... and SMP issues. Note also that not all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-jabber
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://gnome-jabber.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A Jabber client for GNOME
Gnome Jabber is an instant
#include hallo.h
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:39:58PM]:
Optimization is a serious issue too. Unlike most user space software,
using 386 kernel on modern PC will cause serious performance loose.
Especially if you consider mmx/sse/... and SMP issues. Note also that
not
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 23:24:38 -0500
Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, Mark Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm updating the docbook-simple package from V1.0cr2 to V1.0. Since
1.0cr2 1.0, I'm not sure how to handle the situation.
1.0.0 will do the trick, and I think that's
[ Please keep CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:08:36AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
All but two: linux and linux-2.4 (which are actualy the same thing. I.e:
installing one will bring the other).
Where linux would be a meta-package like the gcc meta-package wich
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:39:38AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
At least, the ability to do
apt-get source linux
as it should always have been.
I think it's time we put an end to this euphemism called the kernel
and
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:28:13PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
I wouldn't. I'm going to track the latest minor version, just like the rest
of Debian packages do.
You really, massively, hugely fail to understand the problem here. The
upstream kernel tree works on a
[ Please keep the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:00:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Appliing patches dinamicaly and conditionaly is a huge amount of work?
No, choosing,
Choosing patches is a huge amount of work?
writing
Why should I rewrite a patch that already
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:07:49PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I don't think automatic (as in unless you press ctrl-C or set the
package on hold) major kernel-upgrades are wise, they should only be
done on user-request, when the the user has time to take care of it.
All my major
Richiesta Autorizzazione - Legge Privacy
Gentile Utente,
In conformità alle disposizioni previste dalla legge 675/96, Le richiediamo
autorizzazione ad inserire il suo indirizzo di posta elettronica nella banca
dati di Inforegionali.it, al fine di poter veicolare con periodicità news che
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:24:16PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
I welcome this experiment in a new package of the Linux kernel. I will
be observing its progress in the coming months.
Unlike other core components of the distribution, the kernel package
is easily replaced so there should be no
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:39:58PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
I've read (a part of) resent kernel ITP flamewar.
You should have kept the Subject and the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
otherwise your message is not properly archived in the discussion.
The more I read, the more it
[ Please keep CC to debian-devel@lists.debian.org ]
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:07:17PM +0100, Rens Houben wrote:
- Use the current kernel-image-* package set
- Use apt-src or apt-build
- Use Gentoo (cough)
- Use kernel-package and make-kpkg.
Erm yes. That was meant to be in
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:39:58PM]:
Optimization is a serious issue too. Unlike most user space software,
using 386 kernel on modern PC will cause serious performance loose.
Andrew Suffield wrote:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call bullshit on this.
I can't send any *evidence* here, but I can post my own opinions and
experiences with kernels. And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proposed Desciption :
Songwrite is a guitar tablature (fingering notation) editor and player, quite
similar to TablEdit.
In addition to tablatures, it also supports staff, lyrics and drums.
Printing and playing support are available through
Please please please don't go the Windows way - let's make it usable
for dummies at the price of making it hardly usable by experts! The
saying is: Create a system that is usable even by idiots, and only
idiots will use it.
I made the package in the way I found most consistent and easy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proposed Description:
ircservices-ptlink provides powerful IRC services (NickServ, ChanServ,
MemoServ, NewsServ and OperServ) for the PTlink IRC server. Vlinks,
securemode, guestnicks and logonnews are supported.
The last sentence in the old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proposed Description :
ircopm-ptlink provides a security service for the PTlink IRC server.
This service is able to scan clients on connect for open proxies,
and add G-lines on them for security purpose if needed.
Could you have a look at my first
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ Please keep the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Please don't Cc me and respect Mail-Followup-To.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:00:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Appliing patches dinamicaly and conditionaly is a huge amount of work?
No, choosing,
Choosing
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you wish
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:29:27PM]:
No, I compile without optimisation.
In general, you have right. But people expect s super-optimized kernel
to be shiped by a distro and you may need an SMP version.
That's not the normal tendency in Debian. People who
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:51:32PM]:
You really, massively, hugely fail to understand the problem here. The
upstream kernel tree works on a small number of architectures. To deal
with this, several other architectures have their own trees. These trees
may be
Nikita V. Youshchenko schrieb:
Seems that someone without any sort of complete knowledge of the problem,
decided to maintain one of the most important parts of the system. And the
way he chooses is removing everything that I don't undestand. This looks
like a disaster.
If I didn't get it
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:35:41PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
No. I know this already because other people just kindly told me like you're
doing.
Tell you what? Do you fail to understand sarcasm or just parse
everything said here in a way that you wish to understand?
I'm actualy
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:56:03PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I made the package in the way I found most consistent and easy to
understand, for users and for developers. You're calling me idiot by
saying that, so I'll stop here.
I apologize if the above could be understood that
Moin Eike!
Eike Sauer schrieb am Saturday, den 08. November 2003:
Nikita V. Youshchenko schrieb:
Seems that someone without any sort of complete knowledge of the problem,
decided to maintain one of the most important parts of the system. And the
way he chooses is removing everything that I
It's not cosmetic. The point is it has a completely different
packaging style and philosophy. I want to package the Linux kernel in
the same way the rest of Debian is packaged, that's all.
Until now you have failed to provide a reason for that, other than
cosmetic reasons.
Please
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Or they found a sane trade-off between optimisations and compatibility
(see Wiki page below which was born in discission!). You did not discuss
it. You took your own ideas as guidelines for the future kernel
development.
No, I
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:51:50PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
They won't. Just like Glibc maintainers don't provide optimised
packages I don't see why should I provide them.
Note that it is no longer true for current sid packages.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ apt-cache search
I'm not removing anything. All I do is providing an alternative. If you
don't like my alternative, you may keep using the current scheme.
The impression after reaIding the initial discussion was that this ITP
intends to replace the old scheme.
If this is not true, I will stop my complains.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:36:54PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I don't know about your packages, but for mine testing is indeed a
non-negligeable amount of work. And as my package are not
hardware-dependent I don't need to doublecheck that they work on all
11 architectures.
Your packages
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:54:32AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
It's not cosmetic. The point is it has a completely different
packaging style and philosophy. I want to package the Linux kernel in
the same way the rest of Debian is packaged, that's all.
Until now you have failed
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 05:00:07PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
No, I took the ideas from the thousands of packages in Debian. How many of
them provide optimised binaries?
[...]
If you want me to provide optimised binaries, then this is you who should go
and get the consensus. So instead
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 05:15:17PM]:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:54:32AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
It's not cosmetic. The point is it has a completely different
packaging style and philosophy. I want to package the Linux kernel in
the same way the
reopen 219582
thanks
Your useless attempt to close the bug proves you have no real interest
on consensus. I'll remember that next time you mention the c word.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
See:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call bullshit on this.
I can't send any *evidence*
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:27:42PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
No, I took the ideas from the thousands of packages in Debian. How many of
them provide optimised binaries?
Where do you see an inconsistence in my argumentation? libssl and atlas
are examples whehere optimisations make
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Everything you mentioned there has been declared as pointless in this
thread.
You came up with that, but I'm not going to repeat the same discussion.
Now paste a link or withdraw your claim.
I won't do anything
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 05:00:07PM]:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Or they found a sane trade-off between optimisations and compatibility
(see Wiki page below which was born in discission!). You did not discuss
it. You took your
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 06:27:35PM]:
See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00414.html
Everything you mentioned there has been declared as pointless in this
thread.
You came up with that, but I'm not going to repeat
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call
On Saturday 08 November 2003 19:27, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Robert Millan [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 05:00:07PM]:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Or they found a sane trade-off between optimisations and compatibility
(see Wiki page below which was
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Duck wrote:
* Package name: ircd-ptlink
Hmm, is this a hybrid fork? we already have oftc-hybrid in the
archive... The SSL client connections sound interesting though.
Maybe some patches can be exchanged in the future to add this support
to hybrid,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:18:16PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:55:03PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux?
This will prevent confused users (or: lazy to read the description users)
from asking this
[Follows set to debian-legal.]
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:22:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
If the library as a whole must be under GPL license, how is it
significant that parts of it were once under LGPL or on the public
domain? The purpose of the License field is to tell the user what
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Er, actually, last I heard, the author was still looking into
relicensing it in a manner consistent with XFree86's requirements.
(They don't accept GPLed code.)
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:48:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and
s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 05:19, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
* Package name: gnome-jabber
Description : A Jabber client for GNOME
Drop the leading 'A'.
Is all that distinguishes this client that it is written using GNOME
libraries? If not, drop 'for GNOME' as well.
Gnome Jabber is an
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 07:06, Duck wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coin,
This ITP was badly written as it was my first attempt, sorry.
Here is a better one with an improved Description :
* Package name: ircd-ptlink
Version : 6.16.1
Upstream
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 07:41, Duck wrote:
Songwrite is a guitar tablature (fingering notation) editor and player,
quite similar to TablEdit.
In addition to tablatures, it also supports staff, lyrics and drums.
Printing and playing support are available through external programs.
Songwrite
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 08:01, Duck wrote:
ircservices-ptlink provides powerful IRC services (NickServ, ChanServ,
MemoServ, NewsServ and OperServ) for the PTlink IRC server. Vlinks,
securemode, guestnicks and logonnews are supported.
Very good.
--
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 08:09, Duck wrote:
ircopm-ptlink provides a security service for the PTlink IRC server.
This service is able to scan clients on connect for open proxies,
and add G-lines on them for security purpose if needed.
Excellent!
Could you have a look at my first bad writtent
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 06:06, Duck wrote:
You'r right, Powerful is not adequate, i just took author's descriptionw
without taking care of it.
I asked the author if it was possible to use it without gnome support and he
said it was not, so i suggest this :
s/Powerful /gnome /
In the long
It's not cosmetic. The point is it has a completely different
packaging style and philosophy. I want to package the Linux kernel in
the same way the rest of Debian is packaged, that's all.
Until now you have failed to provide a reason for that, other than
cosmetic
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:11:30PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Songwrite is a tablatures (guitar partitions) editor and player
entirely written in Python.
Is 'partitions' the right word here? (I honestly don't know.)
No.
I'd say guitar tablature notation editor.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:18:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
There was discussion here a while ago about the package descriptions in
webmin and usermin not quite being up to snuff. Now that the package
reorganization has been completed, would someone (Joe?) like to review
them and give me
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:57, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
Well, I for one would love to see a security announcement one day, which
contains something like:
All users running the standard Debian kernel are not affected, since the
special security features the Debian kernel contains prevent the
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 15:18, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 07:41, Duck wrote:
Songwrite is a guitar tablature (fingering notation) editor and player,
quite similar to TablEdit.
In addition to tablatures, it also supports staff, lyrics and drums.
Printing and playing support
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 11:19, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
I'll provide an official package as soon as Gnome Jabber 0.4 is
released. A first package for testing has been created and is available
at http://buug.de/~sheskar/debian/. At the moment it is a native
Debian package because it is based
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:03:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
OTOH, if you provide me good arguments why I should change name of t1lib,
and good explanation why a new package, let's say rsplib, does not conform
to this rule, I will not insist anymore.
1) Consistency is good, and makes
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please provide carefully documented evidence of the performance gains
that you are claiming, not handwaving. Evidence of a difference is not
the same thing; anybody who has any experience with low-level
programming
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 15:18, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
webmin
| Description: Web-based administration toolkit
web-based administration toolkit (i.e., decapitalise Web).
toolkit is also maybe not the right word for this task, but I admit my
ignorance of webmin. tool? interface?
| Webmin is a
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:33:30PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
1. You want to use CDBS, which might be a nice hack, but it's hardly
normal.
I don't recall listing CDBS as one of the advantages.
2. kernel-image-* contains images in a deb.
3. You seem to have a problem
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
People knows all about placebo effect, but do you have any evidence
that there is nothing more than placebo effect?
It's normal for the person claiming that there are two populations to
provide appropriate data and statistics to back up the claim.[1] By
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:16:35AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:57, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
Well, I for one would love to see a security announcement one day, which
contains something like:
All users running the standard Debian kernel are not affected, since the
Billy Biggs wrote:
[...] Lot of new HW has a better chance to be (better) supported on
newer system (are new kernels available for stable?)
Of particular interest to desktop users is XFree86's video card
drivers.
Or, increasingly, GE NIC support.
(For X support, current unstable isn't
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call bullshit on this.
Gentoo
# time bzip2 -9k
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Er, actually, last I heard, the author was still looking into
relicensing it in a manner
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:34:33PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Consider how long it takes for us to get XFree86 4.3.0 out, when most
of the other distro's are already shipping with 4.3.0, and the CVS
tree generally works just fine for i386. I'm told one of the reasons
for this is because
#include hallo.h
* Glenn McGrath [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 09:53:26AM]:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call bullshit on this.
Gentoo
What does that mean? Gentoo uses a
Branden,
I don't disagree with anything you've stated regarding my sloppy
arguments. However, as you are implying on a public forum that I don't
grasp the subject matter of licenses, I'm going to defend myself a little.
I wrote, unfortunately, If the library as a whole must be under GPL
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:09:27PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
I would like to inform you, that some important changes happened to
t1lib 1.3.1-4[1] package.
I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its
name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
3. You seem to have a problem with the kernel-source-* packges,
which I honestly don't follow.
Do you understand what standarisation means?
Is that your problem? Having source distributed in binary packages?
Then
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:11:53PM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled:
[snip]
I'm interested in the notion of license metadata for file packages (in
the general sense)-- what the semantics would be, whether or how it
could be useful, etc. As someone pointed out, there is no such thing
for
Marek Habersack wrote:
In fact, I'm considering adding a
list of files in the library and their associated licenses to the
README.Debian in the package once it hits Sid (I've uploaded it already). I
grew aware of problems with licensing while working on Caudium. We, as the
Caudium Group, don't own
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# time bzip2 -9k linux-2.6.0-test5.tar
real2m40.974s
user2m33.679s
...
user2m49.316s
Even then, it's about only 10 percent. Let's compare them with vanilla
kernel, optimised for P4:
What are you trying to measure here? If you want to
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:57:36PM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled:
Marek Habersack wrote:
In fact, I'm considering adding a
list of files in the library and their associated licenses to the
README.Debian in the package once it hits Sid (I've uploaded it already). I
grew aware of problems with
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Tom wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You'r right, i checked and saw it is not part of the GNU project.
I contacted the upstream author and explained him the problem.
He should sort out his situation in a near future.
I suggested him to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask about entering the
Is it possible to upgrade GPM in unstable to 1.20.1 (at least) which has
been out for a long time now. It would fix a lot of brokenness in GPM.
There was a previous discussion in March about this topic, nothing ever
came of it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 01:09:09 -0600
Source: pybliographer
Binary: pybliographer
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.93-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:40:27 +1100
Source: xfce4-artwork
Binary: xfce4-artwork
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Lau [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:44:56 +0100
Source: fontconfig
Binary: libfontconfig1 fontconfig-udeb fontconfig libfontconfig1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:44:25 +0100
Source: phalanx
Binary: phalanx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 22-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 11:11:54 +0100
Source: bugreporter-udeb
Binary: bugreporter-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Petter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 11:40:12 +0100
Source: autopartkit
Binary: autopartkit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.65
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Petter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 05:23:32 +
Source: aap
Binary: aap aap-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.044-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cory Dodt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Cory Dodt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:53:46 +0100
Source: alltraxclock
Binary: gkrellm-alltraxclock
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Romain Lerallut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Romain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 13:20:59 +0100
Source: epos
Binary: epos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.5.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 13:37:49 +0100
Source: tlf
Binary: tlf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:49:24 +
Source: scons
Binary: scons
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.94-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
