controle du contenu d'un paquet source

2004-12-08 Thread Frédéric BOITEUX
Bonjour, Je réalise des paquets Debian pour des logiciels maison, et j'ai un petit souci : je regroupe les sources dans un répertoire de nom paquet-version, qui comporte entre autres un répertoire debian décrivant le paquet. Lorsque je construis les paquets à partir de mon répertoire

Re: menu-method for .desktop files?

2004-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Bill Allombert wrote: So we could: move kdm:/usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ to menu-xdg:/usr/share/xdg/sessions/ Perhaps a stupid question because I do not understand all this menu stuff: Would this (together with Gnome 2.8) fix the user menus in Gnome??? This would be reall

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): very strict regarding anything regarding Nazism. s/Nazism/Crimes against Mankind (or whatever it should be properly called in English...original version is apologie de crimes contre l'humanité)

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:17:46AM -0300, Fabricio Cannini wrote: --- Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Am 2004-12-07 10:39:42, schrieb Fabricio Cannini: Me wonders if simply NOT installing hot-babe wouldn't fix this. IMO Seems to be the easiest solution. In theory !

Re: Bug#284642: ITP: dpkg-reversion -- change the version of a DEB file

2004-12-08 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 18:13 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: I needed a tool to change the version number of DEB files after repacking them with dpkg-repack. So I wrote one. Very simple, does not really warrant its own package, but devscripts is also not really the place for it. It is unlikely

Re: Bug#284642: ITP: dpkg-reversion -- change the version of a DEB file

2004-12-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]: Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are intended for integration into dpkg at some point. well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended for integration into dpkg, then

Re: Bug#282742: Move daily find run later

2004-12-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-12-07 Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2004-11-24 Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: findutils [...] It would be nice if the daily find run could be moved behind the logrotate and sysklogd runs (maybe as zz_find) [zz_find is ugly] [...] No, I was thinking that

Where is your freedom of speech ? (Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor)

2004-12-08 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Warniong : I'm not an Ordained Debian Developper (TM) : my words are just those of a Debian User, worried by this new upsurge of hair splitting, US smelling madness. Hi again, perhaps to bring down the conversation to something more constructive, I think we should base decision to have

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
The discussion about common carriers is all very interesting, but irrelevant. There are many protections in American law, and common carrier status is only one. We are certainly not responsible for things which are not obscene, and the package in question is not obscene (b/c under US law a

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

2004-12-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 07:42, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered to be appealing to prurient interests. Unless, *maybe*, a hyper- horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and not in the

Re: Bug#282742: Move daily find run later

2004-12-08 Thread Martin Schulze
Andreas Metzler wrote: Anyway the solution seems to be overengineered for the problem at hand. I have yet to decide whether * I'll close the bugreport with request denied Please don't do that but tag it wontfix instead if you won't fix this bug report. Regards, Joey -- Open source

Re: Duelling banjos or how a sane community goes crazy

2004-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:12:50AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: I failed in ending this thread when I posted http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/12/msg00016.html instead I caused two trolls making even more noise.

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Tim Cutts
On 8 Dec 2004, at 8:53 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The discussion about common carriers is all very interesting, but irrelevant. There are many protections in American law, and common carrier status is only one. We are certainly not responsible for things which are not obscene, and the

Re: charsets in debian/control

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:56:54PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: But yes, non-ASCII Latin-1 chars should not be given special status over the national chars found in other languages spoken by project members. Debian should be using either ASCII, or Unicode; standardizing on Latin-1

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:12:35 -0800, Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Manoj Srivastava wrote: Oh, and if we do not specify what the nature of what we package, would it be easier to prove we merely carry packages? That would really be nice. I just do not see that we have the slightest

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

2004-12-08 Thread cascardo
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:00:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:17:46AM -0300, Fabricio Cannini wrote: --- Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Am 2004-12-07 10:39:42, schrieb Fabricio Cannini: Me wonders if simply NOT installing hot-babe

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:57 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: On Wednesday 08 December 2004 07:42, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered to be appealing to prurient interests. Unless, *maybe*, a hyper- horny 13 year old boy

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 07 dcembre 2004 23:51 -0500, James A. Treacy a crit : SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they should be handled. So, I don't think that's much different from PNG icons. What is the proper way to handle svg icons? For example, where should they be

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 09:31 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:00:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:17:46AM -0300, Fabricio Cannini wrote: --- Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Am 2004-12-07 10:39:42, schrieb Fabricio

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, isn't the actual underlying problem that the Debian Policy only accepts XPM icons (and lintian with it)? I don't know the background of this decision, but could imagine: - broad acceptance (aside from GNOME and KDE), PNG should be fine on this one, SVG not yet. - text oriented format: SVG OK,

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Loïc Minier
Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed, Dec 08, 2004: To summarize, I think recommending SVG would require a change to the policy. It's defined in the _Menu_ Policy. I think the people maintaining the Debian menu system are best placed to tell what should be allowed or not. Additionally,

Re: charsets in debian/control

2004-12-08 Thread Thaddeus H. Black
It is one thing spiritedly to argue a point against friends and allies. It is another to be obstinate. I do not wish the latter, and I admit that I am both outnumbered and outreasoned today. Please permit me without malice to conform my position, which now might be stated as follows. Unicode

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread James A. Treacy
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:06:26PM +0100, Lo?c Minier wrote: Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed, Dec 08, 2004: To summarize, I think recommending SVG would require a change to the policy. It's defined in the _Menu_ Policy. I think the people maintaining the Debian menu system are

Backups in maintainer scripts

2004-12-08 Thread Diogo Kollross
I'm replacing files in the maintainer script of a package, but I would like to maintain backups of these files. Is there any good practice about that (eg: like renaming the old file to filename~ or filename.old)? I would also like to know if dpkg makes any backups when installing packages, and if

Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is ridiculous. If you can't package it, then say so so others can come in and do the job. We deserve a freedesktop.org package by now in debian. Get off your ass. Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread David Pashley
On Dec 08, 2004 at 17:15, Luis R. Rodriguez praised the llamas by saying: Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is ridiculous. If you can't package it, then say so so others can come in and do the job. We deserve a freedesktop.org package by now in debian.

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 05:21:56PM +, David Pashley wrote: On Dec 08, 2004 at 17:15, Luis R. Rodriguez praised the llamas by saying: Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is ridiculous. If you can't package it, then say so so others can come in and

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El mi, 08-12-2004 a las 12:30 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez escribi: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 05:21:56PM +, David Pashley wrote: On Dec 08, 2004 at 17:15, Luis R. Rodriguez praised the llamas by saying: Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Greenland
On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is ridiculous. If you can't package it, then say so so others can come in and do the job. We deserve a freedesktop.org package by now in debian. If you're

Re: Where is your freedom of speech ? (Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor)

2004-12-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:29:55AM +0100, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Debian might fare much better if its members who happen to be citizens of the U f*ck*ng S of A rememeber sometimes that they are *not* center and moral arbiter of the world... The same can be told of (semi-) legal

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Tim Cutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I could be wrong, but Debian is occasionally used and distributed by people outside the USA. Making any argument in this thread with reference solely to US law is irrelevant to the problems at hand. I was answering a claim about US law; I was not the one

Bug#284778: ITP: freebooters -- Free Pirates! like strategy game

2004-12-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: freebooters Version : 0.2.2 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://home.gna.org/freebooters * License : GPL Description : Free Pirates! like strategy game The Caribbean Sea in the late 16th

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: thanks for the prompt e-mail. The goal of my e-mail was to get us off our asses and get a debian xorg package out. Today I realized there An email won't help. The package itself might, if uploaded to experimental (don't you dare upload such a thing

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:41:35PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: El mi??, 08-12-2004 a las 12:30 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez escribi??: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 05:21:56PM +, David Pashley wrote: On Dec 08, 2004 at 17:15, Luis R. Rodriguez praised the llamas by saying:

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread dsr
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 04:48:24PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: A mirror operator in general /does/ make choices about the content carried on the mirror. The closest analogy that would already have been litigated is a Cable TV system. The U.S. FCC decided that

dpkg-reversion: how about debedit?

2004-12-08 Thread martin f krafft
retitle 284642 ITP: debedit -- script to edit DEB files with hooks or interactively thanks Together with Goswin, I have now given dpkg-reversion the ability to invoke a hook on the unpacked binary package. He is now using it to test moving /lib64 from base-files to libc6 on amd64 and to change

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Bruce Perens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Akamai is fully able to turn customers away, and has done so for various reasons (e.g. the customer is a spammer). That's the key. And we had a posting from Joe Alewin that was most informative on this topic. For an example of a non-discriminatory mirror, consider the

Re: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

2004-12-08 Thread Scott Robinson
If my wife saw my son with these pictures on a disk that I gave him, she'd take a frying pan and beat me dead. And what would she say about any number of other iffy packages? bible-kjv? Probably nothing because it isn't offensive to her. fortunes-off? Because hot-babe uses graphics it's worse?

On closing lists of bugs in changelog...

2004-12-08 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
libsdl1.2 (1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Thanks go to Lawrence Williams ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) for this release. * Updated to 07/10/2004 CVS. * Added --static-libs to sdl-config manpage. * Added NAS support. * Provide debian patches for autogen.sh ( needs

attn: matt hope -- your mail bounces

2004-12-08 Thread martin f krafft
This is probably related to your university address, which also bounces with too many hops. - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Too many hops - End forwarded message - -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the

Re: On closing lists of bugs in changelog...

2004-12-08 Thread Bill Allombert
reopen 170548 thanks On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:43:42PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: * Added ./autogen.sh call in debian/rules ( makes package more portable and easier to maintain in the future ). * (Closes: 273895, 217516, 220407, 252897, 159110, 170548, 203843)

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:25:22AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:06:26PM +0100, Lo?c Minier wrote: It's defined in the _Menu_ Policy. I think the people maintaining the Debian menu system are best placed to tell what should be allowed or not. It is

Bug#284806: ITP: authfail -- Netfilter REJECT/DROP for hosts with too many auth failure

2004-12-08 Thread Olivier Lemaire
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: authfail Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Bartosz M. Krajnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.bmk.bz/authfail/ * License : GPL Description : Netfilter REJECT/DROP for hosts with too many auth failure

Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Bruce Perens
The Linux Core Consortium would like to have Debian's involvement. This organization has revived what I originally proposed to do as the LSB - to make a binary base for Linux distributions that could be among several distributions who would share in the effort of maintaining certain packages.

Re: binary NMUs and version numbers

2004-12-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
cases: 1.rc 1.rc0+b1 1.rc2 1.2-1~beta 1.2-1~beta0+b1 1.2-1~beta2 Another case that should be considered is the existing use of + for revisions of a cvs snapshot (e.g. mutt uses a + but always does so): 1.2-20041208 1.2-20041208+2 1.2-20041208+b1 There are 3 simple solutions to this: 1

Re: Bug#170548: On closing lists of bugs in changelog...

2004-12-08 Thread Matthew Danish
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:47:25PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: reopen 170548 thanks On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:43:42PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: * Added ./autogen.sh call in debian/rules ( makes package more portable and easier to maintain in the future ). *

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:59:10PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: The main technical effect that I see would be that the names of some dynamic libraries would change. And compatibility with the old names could be maintained indefinitely if necessary. How in the world does changing the names of

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:59:10PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: The main technical effect that I see would be that the names of some dynamic libraries would change. And compatibility with the old names could be maintained indefinitely if necessary.

popularity-contest releases-in-use stats

2004-12-08 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian developers I have added sometimes ago a new graph to popcon.debian.org showing what release of popularity-contest were used to report. Here is today results: Statistics per popularity-contest releases: 1.18.woody.19: 114 1.19 : 33 1.20

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Bruce Perens
Steve, Henrique answered your question. There has been some divergence between various distributions regarding the naming and especially the versioning of these libraries. We would heal that fork to increase compatibility. Doing that means that some names and version tags are going to change

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Bruce, On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: Henrique answered your question. There has been some divergence between various distributions regarding the naming and especially the versioning of these libraries. We would heal that fork to increase compatibility.

Re: dselect survey

2004-12-08 Thread Miles Bader
Gergely Korodi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From time to time I give a try to aptitude and synaptic, but always recoil in horror. I don't know what the fuss is about aptitude, IMHO it's way more complicated to use than dselect, and less clear as well. Amazing I used dselect a lot back in

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Stephen Frost
* Bruce Perens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Henrique answered your question. There has been some divergence between various distributions regarding the naming and especially the versioning of these libraries. We would heal that fork to increase compatibility. Doing that means that some names

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The authoritative document is the menu _manual_: (/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7 An extract from that section: Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include

Re: dpkg-reversion: how about debedit?

2004-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:56:23PM +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: retitle 284642 ITP: debedit -- script to edit DEB files with hooks or interactively thanks Together with Goswin, I have now given dpkg-reversion the ability to invoke a hook on the unpacked binary package.

Re: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:34 -0800, Scott Robinson wrote: If my wife saw my son with these pictures on a disk that I gave him, she'd take a frying pan and beat me dead. And what would she say about any number of other iffy packages? bible-kjv? Probably nothing because it isn't offensive

Re: Bug#170548: On closing lists of bugs in changelog...

2004-12-08 Thread Lawrence Williams
Matthew Danish wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:47:25PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: reopen 170548 thanks On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:43:42PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: * Added ./autogen.sh call in debian/rules ( makes package more portable and easier to maintain in the

Re: Is Debian a common carrier? Was: package rejection

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 10:31 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Tim Cutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] To be honest I really don't see what the problem is here. Content which is illegal to distribute in pretty much any significant market should be kept off the first CD, and probably

Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:55 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The authoritative document is the menu _manual_: (/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7 An extract from that section: Debian package

Re: murphy is listed on spamcop

2004-12-08 Thread Miles Bader
paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In which case, is there something fundamentally broken about the spamcop system ? Or is there some technically insoluble problem here ? It seems to be more that they just don't really give a crap: (1) they trust users, (2) users are stupid, and (3) there's no

Re: dselect survey

2004-12-08 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:11:31AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: I used dselect a lot back in the day (I don't know, like up until 2000 or so?). It had a clunky but useable interface (though I fully understand how newbies could get frustrated), and generally worked all right until there was a

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Get off your ass. Ah. I see. Courtesy is not your strong point. His parents must not have taught him manners. Or he knows that he can't get beat up by

Re: dselect survey

2004-12-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:23:16PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:11:31AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: I used dselect a lot back in the day (I don't know, like up until 2000 or so?). It had a clunky but useable interface (though I fully understand how newbies

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:26:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Get off your ass. Ah. I see. Courtesy is not your strong point. His parents must not

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 17:41 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Bruce, On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: [snip] I'm skeptical to begin with of the benefits LCC has to offer Debian -- being bound not just to an external *standard*, but to an external *implementation*

Re: Status of this ITP?

2004-12-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:36 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:26:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Get off your ass. Ah. I

Re: dselect survey

2004-12-08 Thread Blunt Jackson
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:32:35 -0800, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:23:16PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: Maybe I'm still waiting for my first real problem to show up, but I generally find dselect to be a real pleasure to use. Could you present an

Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-08 Thread Bruce Perens
Steve Langasek wrote: Changing library *names*, OTOH, is something quite different -- and in the first case, providing "compatibility with the old names" totally defeats the purpose of *having* sonames, whereas in the second case, it still sounds like gratuitous change to me. Steve, I

Re: binary NMUs and version numbers

2004-12-08 Thread Anthony Towns
REJECTing uploads whose versions match [^0-9]+[a-z][0-9]+$ presumably. Another case that should be considered is the existing use of + for revisions of a cvs snapshot (e.g. mutt uses a + but always does so): 1.2-20041208 1.2-20041208+2 1.2-20041208+b1 Hrm, why isn't this 1.2+20041208-1 ? Isn't

Accepted scm 5d9-4.1 (alpha source)

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:23:48 -0800 Source: scm Binary: scm Architecture: source alpha Version: 5d9-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: James LewisMoss [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted goobox 0.6.0-1 (powerpc source)

2004-12-08 Thread Dan Korostelev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:20:05 +0300 Source: goobox Binary: goobox Architecture: source powerpc Version: 0.6.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted sysstat 5.1.3-2 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:49:19 +0100 Source: sysstat Binary: isag sysstat Architecture: source i386 all Version: 5.1.3-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert Luberda

Accepted tome 2.3.0-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:22:40 -0600 Source: tome Binary: tome Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.3.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted kernel-package 8.116 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:43:28 -0600 Source: kernel-package Binary: kernel-package Architecture: source all Version: 8.116 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava

Accepted autofs 4.1.3-6 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:20:30 +0100 Source: autofs Binary: autofs-hesiod autofs-ldap autofs Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.1.3-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted languagechooser 1.44 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Colin Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:32:16 +0100 Source: languagechooser Binary: languagechooser Architecture: source all Version: 1.44 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Colin

Accepted osgal-cvs 20041121-2 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread OuoU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:49:11 +0100 Source: osgal-cvs Binary: libosgal-cvs-dev osgal-cvs-doc libosgal-cvs Architecture: source all i386 Version: 20041121-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL

Accepted cyrus21-imapd 2.1.17-3 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:19:52 -0200 Source: cyrus21-imapd Binary: cyrus21-doc cyrus21-admin cyrus21-murder cyrus21-common cyrus21-imapd cyrus21-clients cyrus21-dev cyrus21-pop3d libcyrus-imap-perl21 Architecture: source i386 all

Accepted hal 0.4.2-2 (powerpc all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:18:14 +0100 Source: hal Binary: libhal-dev hal-doc libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 libhal0 hal hal-device-manager Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 0.4.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Accepted kernel-package 8.117 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:48:47 -0600 Source: kernel-package Binary: kernel-package Architecture: source all Version: 8.117 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava

Accepted tor 0.0.8+0.0.9rc7-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Peter Palfrader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:22:44 +0100 Source: tor Binary: tor Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.8+0.0.9rc7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL

Accepted mathopd 1.5p4-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Jose M. Moya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:12:17 +0100 Source: mathopd Binary: mathopd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5p4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose M. Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jose M. Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted db4.3 4.3.21-8 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Clint Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:18:33 -0500 Source: db4.3 Binary: libdb4.3++-dev libdb4.3 libdb4.3-java libdb4.3-dev libdb4.3-tcl libdb4.3++ db4.3-util db4.3-doc Architecture: source all Version: 4.3.21-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Accepted liblog-log4perl-perl 0.50-1 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:26:18 -0600 Source: liblog-log4perl-perl Binary: liblog-log4perl-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.50-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Manoj

Accepted regexp-pp 0.9.5.1-2 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:02:46 -0600 Source: regexp-pp Binary: libregexp-pp-ocaml-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.5.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: John Goerzen

Accepted python-qt3 3.13-2 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:02:45 + Source: python-qt3 Binary: python2.3-qt3 python-qt3-doc python2.3-qtext python-qt3-gl python-qtext pyuic3 python-qt-dev python2.3-qt3-gl python-qt3 pyqt-tools Architecture: source all i386 Version:

Accepted howl 0.9.8-1 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:30:19 +0100 Source: howl Binary: mdnsresponder howl-utils libhowl-doc libhowl-dev libhowl0 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.9.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jeff Waugh [EMAIL

Accepted discover 2.0.6-3 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:42:39 -0500 Source: discover Binary: discover-udeb libdiscover2 discover libdiscover-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.6-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Discover Workers [EMAIL

Accepted highlight 2.2.6-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Ayman Negm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:13:15 +0100 Source: highlight Binary: highlight Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ayman Negm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ayman Negm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted schooltool 0.8-2 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Brian Sutherland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:57:26 +0100 Source: schooltool Binary: libschooltool libschooltool-clients schooltool-clients schooltool schoolbell Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted quilt 0.37-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Martin Quinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:12:21 +0100 Source: quilt Binary: quilt Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.37-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted manpages-fr 1.58.0-8 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Denis Barbier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:06:15 +0100 Source: manpages-fr Binary: manpages-fr Architecture: source all Version: 1.58.0-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Denis Barbier [EMAIL

Accepted bsdgames 2.16-5 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Joey Hess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:39:12 -0500 Source: bsdgames Binary: bsdgames Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.16-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted debhelper 4.2.26 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Joey Hess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:44:44 -0500 Source: debhelper Binary: debhelper Architecture: source all Version: 4.2.26 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted mailto 1.2.7-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:16:14 +0100 Source: mailto Binary: mailto Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted procmeter3 3.4c-2 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Joey Hess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:05:30 -0500 Source: procmeter3 Binary: procmeter3 Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.4c-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted chkrootkit 0.44-1 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread lantz moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:28:48 -0800 Source: chkrootkit Binary: chkrootkit Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.44-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: lantz moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: lantz moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted blacs-mpi 1.1-23 (i386 source all)

2004-12-08 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:53:36 +0100 Source: blacs-mpi Binary: blacs1-lam blacs1-mpich blacs-test-common blacs-lam-test blacs-mpich-test blacs-lam-dev blacs-mpich-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.1-23 Distribution: unstable

Accepted alien 8.50 (all source)

2004-12-08 Thread Joey Hess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:20:42 -0500 Source: alien Binary: alien Architecture: source all Version: 8.50 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted waproamd 0.6-6 (i386 source)

2004-12-08 Thread Oliver Kurth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:56:12 -0800 Source: waproamd Binary: waproamd Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Oliver Kurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >