[Jeff Stevens]
> If /etc/hosts were changed to:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
>
> Resolution of 127.0.0.1 would properly return localhost.
Yeah, but that's all beside the point. There is no point in swapping
the order of the two names unless there be any point in having
"loca
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson:
>
>>> I think you might get broader support in the vendor community if you
>>> make the license for modified copying non-copyleft.
>>
>> Yes, that is the intention. Requiring a copyleft license is likely to
>> meet with disapproval f
[Mattia Dongili]
> * Package name: acpica-unix
>
> iasl compiles ASL (ACPI Source Language) into AML (ACPI Machine
> Language). This AML is suitable for inclusion as a DSDT in system
> firmware. It also can disassemble AML, for debugging purposes.
The name is a bit silly, IMO. It's not as t
OK, I have modified netcfg so that it writes
127.0.0.1 localhost
to /etc/hosts.
>From now on let's consider at least the following two phenomena to be
bugs:
* The application expects to be able to resolve 'localhost.localdomain'
to an IP address.
* The application breaks if 'localhost.l
On Fri, October 14, 2005 10:46 am, Peter Samuelson said:
>
> [Mattia Dongili]
>> * Package name: acpica-unix
>>
>> iasl compiles ASL (ACPI Source Language) into AML (ACPI Machine
>> Language). This AML is suitable for inclusion as a DSDT in system
>> firmware. It also can disassemble AML, for d
Em Qui, 2005-10-13 às 22:36 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg escreveu:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> >Package: general
> >
> >override change are not announced to the package maintainers, _after_
> >a package is uploaded.
> >
> I don't beleive this is true. I just got the following email from the
> archi
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:04:20AM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> What doko meant, if I understand this correctly, is that, if a package
> has already been uploaded when an ftpmaster modifies the overrides, the
> maintainer will not get to know about it until s/he uploads a new
> package a
reassign 333844 dak
severity 333844 wishlist
thanks
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:00:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> override change are not announced to the package maintainers, _after_
> a package is uploaded.
Fwiw, they *are* listed on the PTS Package Tracking system,
packages.qa.debian.org/$
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 333844 dak
Bug#333844: override changes are not announced to the package maintainers
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `dak'.
> severity 333844 wishlist
Bug#333844: override changes are not announced to the package maintainers
Severity
Le vendredi 14 octobre 2005 à 00:26 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
[..]
> The following packages have been orphaned:
>
>and (#333683), orphaned today
[..]
I'm maintainer (but still not DD) of this package "and", and the
bugreport does not apply to it, still I do not want to orphan it at a
* Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-14 14:50]:
> >and (#333683), orphaned today
> I'm maintainer (but still not DD) of this package "and", and the
> bugreport does not apply to it, still I do not want to orphan it at all.
> Do I need to do something or contact someone to confirm this?
retitle 333683 O: octave-statdataml, r-cran-statdataml, r-cran-xml
thanks
Hi Jerome,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
>> and (#333683), orphaned today
> I'm maintainer (but still not DD) of this package "and", and the
> bugreport does not apply to it, still I do not want to orphan it at all.
> Do I need t
On Friday 14 October 2005 02:47, Thomas Hood wrote:
> OK, I have modified netcfg so that it writes
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
>
> to /etc/hosts.
Thank you! Yay for purging ugly non-standardness! =)
> From now on let's consider at least the following two phenomena to be
> bugs:
>
> * The applicat
Hi,
does anybody know about a ready-made script that would extract all
package names and maintainers of packages depending on X from the
Packages file, and send e-mails to them, replacing the package name for
some boilerplate text in a text I feed it:
Dear Maintainer of ,
you receive this mail b
Scripsit Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The copyright notice says "all rights reserved" right before the
> rest of the license spells out several rights which are, in fact,
> not reserved.
Those several rights are probably (I haven't read the full license)
granted only subject to certain c
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:47:26PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about a ready-made script that would extract all
> package names and maintainers of packages depending on X from the
> Packages file, and send e-mails to them, replacing the package name for
> some boilerplate
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: orpheus
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Konstantin Klyagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://thekonst.net/orpheus/
* License : GPL
Description : text mode menu-
Henning Makholm writes:
> But in fact "All rights reserved" is just legal boilerplate that has no
> freedom-related consequences at all. It used to be (before the USA joined
> the Berne treaty, iirc) that this particular language was a formal
> necessity for asserting any copyright in the first pla
James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:47:26PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anybody know about a ready-made script that would extract all
>> package names and maintainers of packages depending on X from the
>> Packages file, and send e-mails to them, rep
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 11:34 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:04:20AM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> > What doko meant, if I understand this correctly, is that, if a package
> > has already been uploaded when an ftpmaster modifies the overrides, the
> > maintainer
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 10:47 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> OK, I have modified netcfg so that it writes
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
>
> to /etc/hosts.
>
> >From now on let's consider at least the following two phenomena to be
> bugs:
>
> * The application expects to be able to resolve 'localhost.l
Thomas...
On Friday 14 October 2005 10:47, Thomas Hood wrote:
> OK, I have modified netcfg so that it writes
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
>
> to /etc/hosts.
Thank you very much. My fellow sysadmins will appreciate that.
And of course I'm very glad that after a lot of global warming
the thread fina
Thomas Hood wrote:
OK, I have modified netcfg so that it writes
127.0.0.1localhost
to /etc/hosts.
Excellent. Thank you. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Nathanael Nerode:
>
> > In gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0, these functions have been replaced with
out-of-line
> > functions, implemented in libstdc++.
>
> Do these out-of-line functions avoid the LOCK prefix overhead on
> non-SMP systems or, at least, non-threaded programs (for example,
> using some
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:55:30PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 11:34 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > And he get only warnings for binary packages he uploaded, not for the
> > packages which are only built by the autobuilders.
>
> Perhaps because the override ch
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 19:22 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar escreveu:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:55:30PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> > Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 11:34 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > > And he get only warnings for binary packages he uploaded, not for the
> > > packages whi
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I suppose you are right. I have changed the license into:
>
> The Contributor grants third parties the right to
> copy and distribute the Contribution, with or without
> modification, in any medium, without royalty. If the
>
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, you misunderstand. Bastian means that if some binary packages
> are only built on some archs, not including the one the upload is
> taking place for, nobody will get an override disparity
> warning[1]. And he's correct, as override disparity
Hi
I started to debianize UniGnuplot, a graphical frontend for Gnuplot.
Now I am at a point where I can't maintain it, because there are some bugs
which may be easy for a Tcl/Tk coder, but not for me ;=)
The package seems to have a dead upstream!!!
If someone here is interested in maintaining th
On Saturday 15 October 2005 02:36, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi
>
> I started to debianize UniGnuplot, a graphical frontend for Gnuplot.
> Now I am at a point where I can't maintain it, because there are some bugs
> which may be easy for a Tcl/Tk coder, but not for me ;=)
>
> The package seems to hav
Frank Küster wrote:
> In the particular case, the reason is something else: If the recommended
> package B (tetex-bin) is there, it makes sense to run one of its
> executables (mktexlsr, updmap) to register the files of package A (any TeX
> font package). This is a time-consuming process. Howeve
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:35:19PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> This property of metapackages has always irked me. If I install gnome
> and then remove gnome-games, I won't automatically benefit in the next
> release from any other goodies the gnome maintainers have added to
> "gnome" package.
T
32 matches
Mail list logo
