-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/07 01:27, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
[Frankly, if you're concerned about whether someone has seen your
mail, surely the ack from the BTS is sufficent.
On Saturday 24 February 2007 23:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
social contract, and fedora (and I came to debian before fedora
and haven't paid that much attention to fedora) as hobbled by it's
client status to redhat, which is a shame because I had hoped when
fedora came about it might have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
Am Mo den 26. Feb 2007 um 3:03 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
errrm, let me think. YES !
[some calculation]
so well, hmm let me think again ... YES THIS IS A DAMN PERFECT
ARGUMENT.
Sorry, but NO. It only shows that there is more
* Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 02:35]:
If a maintainer keeps doing uploads we can be almost sure that he is not
ignoring bugs too.
Especially with the big packages used as example why this would be hard
this is not obvious, and I think for many packages it is even simply not
true.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:32:41PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:55:39AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
And btw, help for bug triaging for any of those kind of packages is
vastly appreciated... But here is a newsflash: 100 bugs is fairly easy
to reduce. the
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 03:03]:
So now let's do a simple calculation. 100 bugs, 20 minutes, that's
2000 minutes, over 6 weeks, that's 333 minutes a week, meaning at least
6 hours a half of work. Just to keep up with bugs. Of completely tedious
work.
Add to that:
* Ron Johnson:
Does the BTS ack *mean* that an actual living breathing human has
eyeballed the bug?
No, it doesn't.
But would an ack from a human being mean that the bug will be fixed in
due course?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Nikita V. Youshchenko:
What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to migrate
from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports with severity =
normal?
I don't think fiddling with testing propagation in this way is a good
idea. After all, even if the package has
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:26:45PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to migrate
from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports with severity =
normal?
Honestly,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:20:31AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:35:48PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
OK. But is there not a fairly sizeable team working on KDE packaging
for Debian?
No. FYI, the KDE team is currently about 6 *active* members, 3 working
a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 03:03]:
So now let's do a simple calculation. 100 bugs, 20 minutes, that's
2000 minutes, over 6 weeks, that's 333 minutes a week, meaning at least
6 hours a half of work. Just to
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 11:05]:
Stripping KDE, php, xorg, gnome, iceweasel, the libc out of stable
would indeed make releases a lot less painful.
xorg just sees activitiy to look at bugs (and it was really overdue),
libc is a beast of itself. For the others I have no
#include hallo.h
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 02:32:28AM]:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 07:27:29PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:12:43AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You and others are most welcome to take a stab at the
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 02:36:13AM]:
On Feb 26, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You and others cannot substitute for a response *from the package
maintainer* acknowledging (or otherwise) the bug report. That's the
criterion being discussed here: not a
Le lundi 26 février 2007 à 09:56 +0100, Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
Sorry, but NO. It only shows that there is more people needed for
maintaining the package!
Yes. We need more people to maintain GNOME, KDE, X.org, the glibc, OOo,
and Mozilla.
Any volunteers around?
--
.''`.
: :' : We are
Le lundi 26 février 2007 à 10:57 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
Now let's think a bit:
- iceweasel is Eric and Mike (2 people): 528 bugs.
- XSF packages is (mostly I think) Julien and David (2 people): I'd
say more than 900 bugs (500 on xorg solely).
- OOo.org is René (_1_
Hello,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
If you want to write a plugin, however (as opposed to an applet that is
shown on a page), then you could indeed use the netscape plugin API
(which is supported by almost every browser for the Linux platform). You
should probably ask the mozilla people about that,
Hendrik,
This was more or less what I wanted to be assured of.
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 Februar 2007 12:11 schrieb Howard Young:
This very much depends on what you want to do.
Netscape-style plugins work in many browsers, e.g. konqueror can use them,
too, like it uses the
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howard,
I can guarantee you that ActiveX plug-ins don't and won't work in
Linux-native browsers.
I am guessing you think I mean to use ActiveX through WINE or some such
thing?
Do not worry that had not been my intention I was
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Howard Young wrote:
I have never heard of Web2.0 before? I will go and find out what this is.
Now you are some lucky person.
You may also want to look at XSwallow:
http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/Packages/XSwallow.html
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: midas
Version : 2006.09
Upstream Author : The European Southern Observatory
* URL : http://www.eso.org/projects/esomidas/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Eduard Bloch wrote:
A good example already comes to my mind where the maintainer
is doing uploads but only for bugs that have RC priority or important
and are easy to fix. Not matching this criteria? Then you are simply
ignored. No answer. Not one single word
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:26:45PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to migrate
from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports with
On Monday 26 February 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 26, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You and others cannot substitute for a response *from the package
maintainer* acknowledging (or otherwise) the bug report. That's the
criterion being discussed here: not a resolution for the
Sir,
I am working in an school. Our new HCL PC with SATA HDD
doesn't support school linux (debian)software .
I can Knew through some reliable sources that If we get driver files of it
,it is easy to install.
I searched for it in internet several times, but i can't get
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
no we can't, as an example I had a bugrapport (with patch) open on
desktop-base for over a year, no reply. It came up in discussion at
debian-desktop list and turns out the maintainer list had somehow gotten
unsubscribed from the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:51:25PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
1) you don't want to leave people hanging (as an exercise in understanding
the users point of view pretend it's an ftpmaster or other central
project function that
On 2007-02-26, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xorg just sees activitiy to look at bugs (and it was really overdue),
libc is a beast of itself. For the others I have no strong preference,
the x-maintainers have been lucky by having a Brice Gogling suddenly
dropping in and pinging all
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:51:25PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
Instead of forging crappy excuses to say
every time I lack time to do this or that, which is with time,
frustrating and demotivating enough.
SO rather than sending excuses-templates,
it's not an excuse template it's:
- an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/07 03:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Ron Johnson:
Does the BTS ack *mean* that an actual living breathing human has
eyeballed the bug?
No, it doesn't.
Ok. That was was I read from Don Armstrong's post, though.
But would an ack from a
On Monday 26 February 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-02-26, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug reports might be read, but not answered. There is no reason to
send a content-less pong to a bug report.
there most definately is a point:
A user sending a bug report is a user
On 2007-02-26, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of those are obvious plusses in the big picture view of the project as=
=20
whole and the relationship of the project with our users.
Welcome as the new helper in the kde bugs in debian.
/me goes back to his bugs for now.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:49:13 +1100
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not register change-linux.com and have it document how to convert between
all the different distributions? If someone finds that Debian doesn't suit
them then I welcome them to change to Fedora - they may change
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said:
I was previously beeing ironic, now I'm not anymore.
No, previously you were being sarcastic. There is a difference between
the two.
I find it quite amusing that you are arguing here that you should not
have to respond to people reporting
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:57, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Now let's think a bit:
- iceweasel is Eric and Mike (2 people): 528 bugs.
- XSF packages is (mostly I think) Julien and David (2 people): I'd
say more than 900 bugs (500 on xorg solely).
- OOo.org is René (_1_ active
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:10:09 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
There is a thing to know about bugs, answering hey, I got your mail
is useless
Hi Pierre,
I'm a user, not a developer. I've filed perhaps a couple of a dozen bugs,
and I find great value in a reply which has no content other than
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:40:07 +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Just an ack, would alleviate frustration on the users' part enourmously. I'm
thinking of something like the following:
I've seen your bug report, at first glance fixing it seems to have lower
priority then A, B, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mistakely send this not as followup to the list:
Hi,
Am Mo den 26. Feb 2007 um 12:02 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Any volunteers around?
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the frontend programmer). But then
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:07:20PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said:
I was previously beeing ironic, now I'm not anymore.
No, previously you were being sarcastic. There is a difference between
the two.
I find it quite amusing that you are
On 2007-02-26, Klaus Ethgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the frontend programmer). But then come to another problem, (and
In the kde team where I are, we work in a svn archive where non-DDs like
me have commit access -
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the frontend programmer). But then come to another problem, (and
yes, I know there is the possibility to have a sponsor) how to just help
without being a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:39:57AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the frontend programmer). But then come to another problem, (and
yes, I know there
* Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 14:28]:
Hey, I was speaking about not releasing such packages at all (perhaps
except libc and the kernel (at least until hurd is ready ;-)). So
Eh? you say that they should not migrate to testing ?
To cite myself:
| Sorry to say it that way. But
On Monday 26 February 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:07:20PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said:
I was previously beeing ironic, now I'm not anymore.
No, previously you were being sarcastic. There is a difference
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Frank B. Brokken wrote:
Dear Steve Langasek, you wrote:
The intention here is to use size_t in situations where the value is known
to be non-negative.
I don't see any reason why you should use size_t for that instead of
unsigned int.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Filipe Lautert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: postgresql-plsh
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://plsh.projects.postgresql.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070226 14:28]:
But Pierre argued that handling bugs is tedious work and there
is no time for all of them and still packaging new upstreams.
I meant that you have to choose a balance between
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:57:46AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:20:31AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:35:48PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
OK. But is there not a fairly sizeable team working on KDE packaging
for
Package: gnomebaker
Hi,
It's usually best to file a bug for things like this. Did that with this
mail.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:08:23PM +0100, Thanatermesis - Elive wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wodim replaces cdrecord and the external applications like gnomebaker
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
it's not an excuse template it's:
- an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is apreciated
- an indication the effort will _not_ be ignored in the long run
- an indication that actual fixing of the bug will take a while
If
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: aes2501-wy
Version : ?
Upstream Author : Wittawat Yamwong
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD like
Programming Lang: C
Description : userspace
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/26/07 01:27, Don Armstrong wrote:
[Frankly, if you're concerned about whether someone has seen your
mail, surely the ack from the BTS is sufficent. Anything else
requires someone to actually do the work.]
Does the BTS ack *mean* that an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: fldigi
Version : 1.30
Upstream Author : David H. Freese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, many people discussed about answering bug reports:
...
I'm soory, but I tried to safe my time and went over most of the
mails in this thread but one point I was missing (only one mail of
Cobaco was touching the idea a little bit): Not answering a bug
report is IMHO at
On Monday 26 February 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
The goal appears to be to have bugs responded to instantly by
maintainers and fixed rapidly.
No, very wrong:
- bugs don't need instant response, they need reasonably timely response
(say within 2 weeks on average)
- BUT, _if_ no triage on the
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Andreas Tille wrote:
A maintainer who refuses to respond to a reasonable bug report of a
user does not deserve any user.
It's not a case of maintainers refusing to respond, it's a case of
some maintainers of some packagages drowning in bugs and not being
able to respond to
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:28:28 +0100 Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
Command line scanning sofware for AES2501B usb fingerprint reader.
The ouput are gray pnm files with quite good quality.
Please mention Authentec (the vendor) and the places where you
can find this reader (Medion MD85264 USB
This is from the perspective of a non-DD systems administrator. While most
maintainers are good. Some are pretty lousy with regard to addressing issue
even when one is proactive about finding a solution.
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:55, Don Armstrong wrote:
I don't believe any maintainer of
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Mistakely send this not as followup to the list:
Hi,
Am Mo den 26. Feb 2007 um 12:02 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Any volunteers around?
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SO rather than sending excuses-templates, when I've had time to check
the bug is actually there, I do use the confirmed tag to:
* ack this is an actual bug ;
* ack that I've been able to reproduce it (hence implying that I've
read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Di den 27. Feb 2007 um 0:11 schrieb David Nusinow:
we currently have a space open for anyone interested in picking up the
beryl packaging, as Shawn has been taking time off. It's a golden
opportunity to work on one of the hottest pieces of
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just for reference, what is currently sent is the following[1]:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
^- an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is appreciated
This is an automatically generated reply, to let
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is apreciated
- an indication the effort will _not_ be ignored in the long run
- an indication that actual fixing of the bug will take a while
I think this is significantly more than the
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, amritham_ gamaya wrote:
Sir,
I am working in an school. Our new HCL PC with SATA HDD
doesn't support school linux (debian)software .
I can Knew through some reliable sources that If we get driver files of it
,it is easy to install.
I searched for
Reid Priedhorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:10:09 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
There is a thing to know about bugs, answering hey, I got your
mail is useless
I'm a user, not a developer. I've filed perhaps a couple of a dozen bugs,
and I find great value in a reply
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Frank B. Brokken wrote:
I don't see any reason why you should use size_t for that instead of
unsigned int. size_t is intended for use in describing the size of objects
in memory, not just for anything you know should be non-negative.
Hm, well,
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing that has been discussed in this thread necessarily means
that an actual human being has done anything, as it's trivial to
write an automated response bot for maintainers for every bug.
In the bug submitter's perspective, even notification of
Bernhard R Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it is a time that is well invested. If a maintainer does not look at
the bugs, he cannot give them due priority. Thus a maintainer needs to
look at them anyhow and do a fast assessment how important it is, how
much work it would involve to fix it
Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Honestly, this would kill almost any larger package.
You sound like it would not make the maintainers care more about
their bugs and start answering them.
I think that's a very valid concern.
One of
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 20:36:21 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I have to completely disagree here. When I started in earnest with the
effort to clean up the sasl package, I literally spent three twelve hour
days in a row doing nothing but bug triage. I really am not surprised
that people
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is apreciated
- an indication the effort will _not_ be ignored in the long run
- an indication that actual fixing of the bug will take a while
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 18:48:49 +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
- XSF packages is (mostly I think) Julien and David (2 people): I'd
say more than 900 bugs (500 on xorg solely).
Add to that Drew Parsons, Michel Dänzer (who mostly helps with the
harder bugs), and Brice Goglin (who
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:04:03AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 20:36:21 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I have to completely disagree here. When I started in earnest with the
effort to clean up the sasl package, I literally spent three twelve hour
days in a row
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
The goal as I understood the OP was to discourage letting bugs (of
'normal' severity or above) sit unacknowledged while the package
moves forward with further uploads. There was nothing in the
proposal about addressing the speed of fixes.
Allow me to
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Would it be hard to add functionallity to the BTS that e-mails the
maintainer once every week with a list of bugs for his packages that
have been unanswered for 2 weeks or more?
The code to the BTS is publicly available at
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:37:10PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Thus, if you have a package with any unanswered important or normal
bugs, it will not progress. In order to assure propogation, you must
respond rapidly to any bug that is filed with these severities, even
though this has nothing
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:30:23 +0100, Ben Finney wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just for reference, what is currently sent is the following[1]:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
^- an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:12 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Now, the iceape case is interesting: *you* (as in, the one complaining
about rotting bugs) are also allowed to help the maintainers instead of
whining. *That* would help. For example, these three packages I have
listed in this mail, they
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:40:07 +0100, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
The goal as I understood the OP was to discourage letting bugs (of
'normal' severity or above) sit unacknowledged while the package
moves forward with further uploads. There was nothing in the
Reid Priedhorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:30:23 +0100, Ben Finney wrote:
There's a huge difference, though, in the effect on the submitter
between receiving an automated your report *will in the future* be
read by a human being,
...which most submitters will
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
what would be so bad about requiring that every = important bug be
tagged (either confirmed, forwarded, non-reproducible, moreinfo, or
upstream) or simply closed?
All bugs *should* be dealt with, but requiring that it be done is
counter productive
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:37:54PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
All bugs *should* be dealt with, but requiring that it be done is
counter productive when maintainers are unable to keep up with the
bugs that they already have.
High numbers of unresponded bugs are an indication that a
Don == Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don It's not a case of maintainers refusing to respond, it's a
Don case of some maintainers of some packagages drowning in bugs
Don and not being able to respond to all of them. [I don't
Don believe any maintainer of packages, given
If someone would actually like to do something about the problem of
maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the simplest
thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that lists bugs that
have not had a maintainer response (filtering out responses that appear
to be from the
Hello,
I have a bug in heimdal-kdc:
http://bugs.debian.org/385809
That is caused because Heimdal is linked against an old version of
libldap, and the new version changes the location of the socket
path. However as far as I can tell, it is not possible to link against
the latest version of
* Reid Priedhorsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:12 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Now, the iceape case is interesting: *you* (as in, the one complaining
about rotting bugs) are also allowed to help the maintainers instead of
whining. *That* would help. For example,
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If someone would actually like to do something about the problem of
maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the
simplest thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that
lists bugs that have not had a maintainer response ...
This is
Le Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:37:10PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
Allow me to quote from the OP:
What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to
migrate from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports
with severity = normal?
Thus, if you have a package
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a bug in heimdal-kdc:
http://bugs.debian.org/385809
That is caused because Heimdal is linked against an old version of
libldap, and the new version changes the location of the socket
path. However as far as I can tell, it is not possible to link
On ma, 2007-02-26 at 23:09 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:28:28 +0100 Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
Command line scanning sofware for AES2501B usb fingerprint reader.
The ouput are gray pnm files with quite good quality.
Please mention Authentec (the vendor) and the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:01:17PM -0600, Reid Priedhorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:10:12 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Now, the iceape case is interesting: *you* (as in, the one complaining
about rotting bugs) are also allowed to help the maintainers instead of
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And not only when bug are fixed don't we get feedback. We sometimes also
face non-responsiveness to our requests for more precisions on the bug...
Ironically, most of the time, this happens with unreproducible bugs.
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And not only when bug are fixed don't we get feedback. We sometimes
also face non-responsiveness to our requests for more precisions on the
bug...
Ironically, most of the time, this happens with unreproducible bugs.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:42:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:37:10PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Thus, if you have a package with any unanswered important or normal
bugs, it will not progress. In order to assure propogation, you must
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
The Fujitsu-Siemens P7120 seems to contain one as well.
Confirmed, and I can use it with this program. Which BTW is at
http://gkall.hobby.nl/authentec.html
I'd post the beautiful fingerprint scan I just did, but that's perhaps
not a great idea. ;-)
--
see shy jo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:57:35 +0100
Source: bbsload
Binary: bbsload
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:27:01 +0100
Source: windowlab
Binary: windowlab
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.33-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:30:28 +0100
Source: dnsdoctor
Binary: dnsdoctor-cgi dnsdoctor
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:48:21 +0100
Source: amsynth
Binary: amsynth
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:18:58 +0100
Source: rosegarden
Binary: rosegarden2 rosegarden4 rosegarden-data rosegarden
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:1.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
