Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>and one a month old,
>>
>>An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to
>>test the fix.
> There is a workaround and the RC bug could be downgraded to important.
No. Having a workaround in the bug log is not somethin
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> * p0f
>
Hi,
I'd like to take this one.
Cheers,
Pierre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'm not sure that I'd be too excited to have reject mails
> archived on the BTS when I'm on the receiving end, but I guess that's
> just me. In most of the cases they would seem to add little value to the
> ITP bug.
Well, they would be pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi fellow developers,
Please someone help look at bug#494422.
What is wrong with my judgement[1]?
It seems to me that bug#494422 origins as the fix for bug#356850[2]
Generally I am worried about initramfs-tools being so invasive (see
bug#494422 -
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> Please someone help look at bug#494422.
>
> What is wrong with my judgement[1]?
you are totaly misinformed as usual,
don't mess with bugs you have zero knownledge with.
> It seems to me that bug#494
Package: general
Version: AMD64
This is basically a debian AMD64-version of the bug report for ubuntu
AMD64 bug 24691 [1].
The problem is (seems to be) that a lot of libraries are built with
alignment above 2**3. Most of these cases are actually 2**20 in ubuntu
AMD64 and 2**21 in debian AMD64. In
Gustaf Räntilä, le Wed 27 Aug 2008 12:50:45 +0200, a écrit :
> I haven't seen many discussions about this in debian, and just 1 about ubuntu
> [1]. It could be that I have gotten things completely the wrong way (then
> please tell me so), but it could also be that this has been overseen for too
Le Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:15:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
> > The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> > * gawk
> > * mawk
> > * gawk-doc (non-free)
>
> I would be willing to take these three.
Hi all,
those pac
Hi,
I have packaged a piece of software [1] which uses a version number
system which is not compatible with Debian's ordering.
The version numbers go like
4.1
4.12
4.2rc -> 4.2~rc
4.2
4.21
(maybe 4.3)
So, 4.12 and 4.21 are point releases, and break the ordering.
I would now like to package 4.2
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:51, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm asking now in case there is another option which would require me
> doing something different for 4.21.
I'd add zeroes to the right, to have always two digits after the
point, which can be done automatically
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:51:19PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> The version numbers go like
>
> 4.1
> 4.12
> 4.2rc -> 4.2~rc
> 4.2
> 4.21
> (maybe 4.3)
>
> So, 4.12 and 4.21 are point releases, and break the ordering.
>
> I would now like to package 4.21, but I'm aware that this leads the
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> kernel-img.conf(5) has nothing to do with initramfs-tools.
> there you'll find do_bootloader documented.
I am glad you are referring to this man page. I found myself looking
for it a while ago, surprised to find that it wasn't installed on the
syst
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:51:19PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I have packaged a piece of software [1] which uses a version number
> system which is not compatible with Debian's ordering.
>
> The version numbers go like
>
> 4.1
> 4.12
-> 4.1.2
> 4.2rc -> 4.2~rc
> 4.2
> 4.21
-> 4.2.1
> (may
Hi!
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:02:06 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> kernel-img.conf(5) has nothing to do with initramfs-tools.
>> there you'll find do_bootloader documented.
>
> I am glad you are referring to this man page. I found myself looking
> for it
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:02:06PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > kernel-img.conf(5) has nothing to do with initramfs-tools.
> > there you'll find do_bootloader documented.
>
> I am glad you are referring to this man page. I found myself looking
>
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:51 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> - package 4.3, if/when it comes along, as 4.30 instead.
and continue to assume a '0' suffix if one is not present, so that 4.4
is actually 4.40 etc.
However, are you sure that getting upstream to use 4.3.0 isn't
achievable? 4.3.1 woul
Hi
Dne Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:51:19 +0100
Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> So, 4.12 and 4.21 are point releases, and break the ordering.
>
> I would now like to package 4.21, but I'm aware that this leads the way
> to problems for 4.3.
>
> As I see it there are three ways to fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:05:42PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Hi fellow developers,
>>
>> Please someone help look at bug#494422.
>>
>> What is wrong with my judgement[1]?
>
>
Hi Maciej,
you reported the problem described above a long time ago and got
not response. I took over the feh package now and just would like
to say sorry for leaving your problem ignored in the first place.
I verified that this problem exists on recent testing with the
current feh version. I'
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:32:21 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also don't forget about suggesting to add it to the CJK languages
> -desktop tasks in tasksel, if it is that important.
>
> I think that non-free packages can be added there...
That's very very helpful for our user
Hi,
Using latest initramfs-tools with lilo works for me, provided that the
new large-memory feature is enabled.
As maks says, user error applies here.
William
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:43 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi fellow developers,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:50:45PM +0200, Gustaf R??ntil?? wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: AMD64
>
> This is basically a debian AMD64-version of the bug report for ubuntu
> AMD64 bug 24691 [1].
>
> The problem is (seems to be) that a lot of libraries are built with
> alignment above 2**3. Mo
Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> So I and other Japanese Debian developer/maintainer/package maintainer/
> users want poppler-data package to there, the CJK languages-desktop
> tasks in tasksel. Please consider that.
The easiest way to have this to happen is by sending a wishlist bug
report against
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:15:09AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>Using latest initramfs-tools with lilo works for me, provided that the
>new large-memory feature is enabled.
>
>As maks says, user error applies here.
Entirely or partly?
If I unders
在 2008-08-27三的 15:58 +0200，Christian Perrier写道：
> Hideki Yamane a écrit :
>
> > So I and other Japanese Debian developer/maintainer/package maintainer/
> > users want poppler-data package to there, the CJK languages-desktop
> > tasks in tasksel. Please consider that.
>
> The easiest way to ha
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Harrasing LILO users by silencing bugreports about problems[2] using
> it
> is the wrong approach. If LILO is officially unsupported by Debian
> (not
> only by kernel team and/or initramfs-tools maintainer) we should drop
> th
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> only one can be installed at a time, but it is a minor bug at best, as
There's no reason why the LILO
Hi,
via Google I have seen that the same problem was reported (and solved,
but I have no idea how to obtain the patch) in archlinux:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=404588
The user who reported the problem found out that the following workaround
solves the problem on his machine:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:51:19 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi, I have packaged a piece of software [1] which uses a version
> number system which is not compatible with Debian's ordering.
> The version numbers go like
4.1
4.12 -> 4.1.2
4.2rc -> 4.2~rc
4.2
4.21 -
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 16:07, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am LILO's maintainer. It is hardly unsupported, infact it is supported
> better now than it has been in a long time. While I do plan to drop it
> post-lenny, it will certaintly be supported for lenny's release
> lifecycle
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:07:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> only one can be installed at a time, but it is a minor bug at best, as
> any smart u
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> only one can be installed at a time, but it is a minor bug at best, as
> any smart user would not have both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:07:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> Harrasing LILO users by silencing bugreports about problems[2] using
>> it is the wrong approach. If LILO is officiall
Hi,
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Once you are satisfied with the content on newpeople you can instruct
> apache on oldpeople to redirect requests to the new place. On gluck
> do the following:
> echo "RewriteEngine on"
> > ~/.public_html/.htacc
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:07:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>>
>> If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
>> is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
>> only one can be installed at a t
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> kernel-img.conf does not pertain to any package, this is meant to be solved
> postlenny by linux images using debian kernel toolkit [1]
>
> kind regards
>
> --
> maks
>
> [1] http://multibuild.org/documentation/dkt
Sounds good! Thanks for the point
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:53 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
> > is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
> > only one can be installed at a time, but it
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
>> so those are for him.
> Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption"?
If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and Ja
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
> >> so those are for him.
>
> > Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> > maintainer of a package that was not up
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:24:36PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> At the moment, http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/people/waldi/dkt/ seems
> to be the best source of information about this project. Is that correct?
yep it allmost got shipped with lenny and there is enough time to clear
things for len
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Nevertheless, we do need your help to find more bugs and improve the
> live systems, so please try them out.
particulary interesting would be to get reports from people with
Intel-based Apple hardware (both notebooks and desktops).
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Dani
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following packages are up for adoption:
Please note I said adoption, not orphaned.
> * gawk
> * mawk
> * gawk-doc (non-free)
Steve Langasek is taking these 3.
> * quinn-diff
Luk Claes is taking this.
(Roger, I'm afraid I don't have a vers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:38:03PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> These 3 are still up for adoption:
>
> > * gnus
> > * gimp-dimage-color
> > * xloadimage
Is there any reason to keep xloadimage around? From what I can tell,
xli is a fork of it that saw some more development but both seem to be
d
>It should be documented: yes.
>But what's your problem? It is the same situation as for so much other
>hardware like WLAN, etc. And the sound card is not even essential for booting
>or downloading additional software.
>And no need to write a driver: it is still there.
I think you didn't get the m
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:42:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing, as unreproducable
has caused the Debian Bug report #365918,
regarding general: /tmp became 0755 durning sid upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:45:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line don't shot yourself in the foot
has caused the Debian Bug report #453334,
regarding general: apt and aptitude stop work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-netaddr
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : David P. D. Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/netaddr/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 444115 net-tools
Bug#444115: general: network interface (eth0) gets undetected after restrat
checked using ifconfig -a
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `net-tools'.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:49:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug (at the time it was filed)
has caused the Debian Bug report #219447,
regarding Networking/PCMCIA startup issues (sarge)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:50:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome1 was removed long ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #162262,
regarding general: Many OMF files are buggy.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:48:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #273413,
regarding Debian 'sarge' - apt-get destroyed hard disks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:14:35 +0300, Joona Kiiski wrote:
>>It should be documented: yes.
>>But what's your problem? It is the same situation as for so much other
>>hardware like WLAN, etc. And the sound card is not even essential for
>>booting or downloading additional software.
>>And no need to wr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 105337 i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates
Bug#105337: a central database for translated templates
Changed Bug title to `i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated
templates' from `a central database for transla
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:56:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this has been solved by now...
has caused the Debian Bug report #25837,
regarding Packages should share a monitor description file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 23712 debian-policy
Bug#23712: check for packages with the same conffiles
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-policy'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello developers,
I would like to know how to discover the library for the structure
"udphdr" because the DHCP_PROBE program (in wanted package of the WNPP)
use this structure and configure is OK but when i compile I have this
error :
dhcp_probe.c:798
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241189 menu
Bug#241189: general: some WM packages build system menus that don't fit onscreen
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `menu'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello developers,
>
> I would like to know how to discover the library for the structure
> "udphdr" because the DHCP_PROBE program (in wanted package of the WNPP)
> use this structure and configure is OK but when i compile I have this
> error :
> dhcp
reassign 224692 texmacs-extra-fonts
thanks
Hi,
reassigning to texmacs-extra-fonts as its appearantly the only package
providing fraktur fonts ;-)
OTOH, "apt-cache search gothic font" gives numerous results in sid, so I
assume adding fraktur to the description would be helpful.
regards,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 224692 texmacs-extra-fonts
Bug#224692: general: Hard to find math Fraktur font
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `texmacs-extra-fonts'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line there are packages to do that...
has caused the Debian Bug report #407442,
regarding general: few free disk detection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:20:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #407446,
regarding general: automatic mount network share in filesystem.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 437118 dpkg
Bug#437118: Report broken package database to use
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `dpkg'.
> retitle 437118 Report broken package database to user
Bug#437118: Report broken package database to use
Changed Bug title to `Repo
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 27 août 2008, vers 21:42,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) disait :
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> retitle 105337 i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates
> Bug#105337: a central database for translat
reassign 437118 dpkg
retitle 437118 Report broken package database to user
close 437118
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this to dpkg, even though I'm not sure if this is right.
Apologies for that.
Because, I wonder if this bug shouldn't better be closed, as dpkg informs the
user/admin directly abou
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 21:06:20 schrieb Sam Morris:
> At some time in the future it will hopefully be possible for udev(?) to
> get the 'missing firmware' event from the kernel;
Since the firmware helper is part of udev, it already knows that the firmware
is missing.
HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:43:16AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
>
> > For those who needs to choose a (light) webserver, this page is meant to
> > gather pros and cons of each one :
> > http://wiki.debian.org/WebServers
> >
> > (Contributions are welcome.)
>
> Both boa and lighttpd require muc
Hi Vincent,
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 22:35, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > Bug#105337: a central database for translated templates
> > Changed Bug title to `i18n.debian.org: a central database for
> > translated templates' from `a central database for translated
> > templates'.
> A
Now that gdebi-core is in back in lenny I've got my automatic package
testing robot working on lenny again. (I got stalled last time due to
leaving Canonical and being busy for a while.)
Mostly what it does right now is build a package, discover that the
package doesn't have any autopkgtest tests
On 27-Aug-08, 16:06 (CDT), Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:43:16AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> >
> > > For those who needs to choose a (light) webserver, this page is meant to
> > > gather pros and cons of each one :
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/WebServe
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:10:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Now that gdebi-core is in back in lenny I've got my automatic package
> testing robot working on lenny again. (I got stalled last time due to
> leaving Canonical and being busy for a while.)
>
> Mostly what it does right now is build
Gonéri Le Bouder writes ("Re: automatic bug filing by test robot"):
> Sorry for promoting my pet toy but I think your script would be a
> great input.
Right ...
> I'm working improving svnbuildstat to be able to support different input. The
> idea is:
> -a database
> -a webinterface to follow t
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> via Google I have seen that the same problem was reported (and solved,
> but I have no idea how to obtain the patch) in archlinux:
>
> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=404588
>
I didn't see anything useful, but here are the files:
http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey,
I intend to upload libwpeditor-plus, a build-dep of modest, under the
pkg-maemo umbrella:
* Package name: libwpeditor-plus
Version : 1.0+svn926
* License : LGPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Sorry for top post.
On a Gateway Sempron (32 bit) laptop ...
Where's dhcp? Laptop has builtin ethernet (Marvell Tech. 88E8036)
which etch handles well. I see it also has BCM4318 802.11g wifi
(which I don't use).
No network, but otherwise works fine. :-)
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:00:31PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Once you are satisfied with the content on newpeople you can instruct
> apache on oldpeople to redirect requests to the new place. On gluck
> do the following:
> echo "RewriteEngine on"
76 matches
Mail list logo
