On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I don't see how the use of a different authentication system
intersects with that bug at all. Can you elaborate what you think the
issue is?
I'm making an uneducated guess that allowing editing by people we
cannot
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I'm making an uneducated guess that allowing editing by people we
cannot contact will be bad for licencing the wiki since we need to
contact people to be able to give pages a license. The current
authentication mechanism requires an email address so there is
[ Just chiming in, but I have not read the whole thread. ]
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
3) Where should dpkg put maintainer scripts and package data?
Suggestions:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/i386/libc6.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/i386-libc6.list
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6/i386.list
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 01:08:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
mii-tool may not be meant for scripts, but I for one have used it in
the past to force speed/duplex like this:
iface eth1 inet static
address 10.122.226.9
netmask
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
... and pretty please, do not choose a solution that will require
adding an -include to 15'000 thousands debian/rules; we will finish
doing that by Lenny+50, the earliest.
It would take some time, yes; but packages
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:38:50AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I am opposed to bloating the policy with dictum that are
unnecessary, but I see your point about the API.
Of course, nobody would object to that, but this bit can be seen as
necessary.
The API is essentially the watch file, and
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
Unless somebody will have persuasive objections I will change it to
group kmem in a future udev upgrade.
This is the thinkpad /dev/nvram stuff, right? I thought for some tpctl
utilities to work, you currently need to be in group nvram. Making
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
* Package name: libzitaconv
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net
* URL : http://kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
* Package name: jconv
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net
* URL : http://kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html
* License : GPL
Programming
Dear, costumer!=0D
We are glad to inform you that Qatar Paintball Centre open a new Military f=
ield at the new location in front of Villaggio Mall. We are open every day.=
For booking, please, call 656 62 19. Welcome to fun and extreme. =0D
=0D
Prices:=0D
=0D
- Junior package (100
Hello,
I would like to get to the point of uploading #519184. However I have
one issue on which I'm unsure: the library API and ABI would be stable
enough, but upstream is not building or supporting shared libraries yet.
Last time I asked, he had some libtool problem in some obscure
architecture
Hi Marco,
On Dienstag, 17. März 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Unless somebody will have persuasive objections I will change it to
group kmem in a future udev upgrade.
Are you planning to file bugs against affected packages to help the
transition?
How will upgrades (from lenny, etch, ...) be
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
Given that the problems are quite
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gustavo R. Montesino grmontes...@ig.com.br
* Package name: libgda4
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : GNOME-DB Project gnome-db-l...@gnome.org
* URL : http://www.gnome-db.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:17:37AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
I would like to get to the point of uploading #519184. However I have
one issue on which I'm unsure: the library API and ABI would be stable
enough, but upstream is not building or supporting shared libraries yet.
Last time I
Hi
Dne Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:34:28 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de napsal(a):
So we should just ignore blatant policy violation until the moment they
do bite us in the ass? So we wait until the verry last moment when
everything would be ready to use multiarch and then we freeze
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
This is the thinkpad /dev/nvram stuff, right? I thought for some tpctl
I think so.
The rationale for this change is harmonization with all other
distributions.
utilities to work, you currently need to be in group nvram. Making that
equivalent
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Note that apt-cross and ia32-apt-get can be used
Il giorno mar, 17/03/2009 alle 10.17 +, Enrico Zini ha scritto:
Hello,
I would like to get to the point of uploading #519184. However I have
one issue on which I'm unsure: the library API and ABI would be stable
enough, but upstream is not building or supporting shared libraries yet.
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
to go.
The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel,
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Note that libc6 and libc6-i386/amd64 will neccessarily always conflict
due to the dynamic linker
Really? I thought the i386 dynamic linker was /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and the
64 bit one was
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
1) How to specify an arch in sources.list?
Don't. Specify it in apt.conf
Suggestion:
deb [arch=i386,amd64] http://ftp.debian.org sid main
APT::Arches i386,amd64
Or something.
What if one
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote:
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
This is the thinkpad /dev/nvram stuff, right? I thought for some tpctl
I think so.
The rationale for this change is harmonization with all other
distributions.
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
This is the thinkpad /dev/nvram stuff, right? I thought for some tpctl
utilities to work, you currently need to be in group nvram. Making that
equivalent to kmem seems unnecessarily broad to
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
1) How to specify an arch in sources.list?
Don't. Specify it in apt.conf
Suggestion:
deb [arch=i386,amd64] http://ftp.debian.org
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
That's the first I've heard that argument - of course you don't give
This is weird, because it has been around for quite a long time.
E.g. cp /bin/bash .; chgrp audio bash; chmod g+s bash
untrusted users access to hardware, but we've always
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:52 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Note that libc6 and libc6-i386/amd64 will neccessarily always conflict
due to the dynamic linker
Really? I thought
Hi,
On Montag, 16. März 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
If I remember right, the GUI editor messed up several pages, so it was
recommended not to use it (and I always hated it with a passion)
Quite a few users choose moinmoin because it have a gui editor.
Fair enough..
so the question is
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
That's the first I've heard that argument - of course you don't give
This is weird, because it has been around for quite a long time.
E.g. cp /bin/bash .; chgrp audio bash; chmod g+s bash
Since
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:44:06PM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 23:33 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Hi all,
Wiki engine migrated
Thanks for the work!
Also, the GUI editor is now disabled, because moinmoin 1.7
Le mardi 17 mars 2009 à 12:26 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
untrusted users access to hardware, but we've always managed access to
devices with group membership (lp, dialout, etc). Are you proposing
that should change?
The rest of the Linux world is:
Cyril Brulebois schrieb:
Yes, you can!
And yes, i did! ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:39:22PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 16. März 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
If I remember right, the GUI editor messed up several pages, so it was
recommended not to use it (and I always hated it with a passion)
Quite a few users choose
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:14:54PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
I'm making an uneducated guess that allowing editing by people we
cannot contact will be bad for licencing the wiki since we need to
contact people to be able to give pages a license. The current
authentication mechanism requires an
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
That's the first I've heard that argument - of course you don't give
This is weird, because it has been around for quite a long time.
E.g. cp /bin/bash .; chgrp audio bash; chmod g+s bash
This argument makes as much sense
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Unless somebody will have persuasive objections I will change it to
group kmem in a future udev upgrade.
Please do not as it will allow users which need to access Thinkpad-specific
devices (== /dev/nvram) access to /dev/{mem,kmem,port}. That's a huge security
hole in my
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net
* Package name: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ilya Evseev
* URL : http://ilya-evseev.narod.ru/posix/pam_alreadyloggedin/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
2009/3/17 Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it:
E.g. cp /bin/bash .; chgrp audio bash; chmod g+s bash
I don't need to point out that this example doesn't make sense, do I?
The rest of the Linux world is:
http://dualstack.ipv6-exp.l.google.com/search?q=policykit .
From policykit page:
PolicyKit is
Le mardi 17 mars 2009 à 14:51 +0100, Luca Niccoli a écrit :
From policykit page:
PolicyKit is specifically targeting applications in rich desktop
environments on multi-user UNIX-like operating systems.
Oh dear yes, another hal-like crap piece of software is just what we
need the whole
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:42:37AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:17:37AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
I would like to get to the point of uploading #519184. However I have
one issue on which I'm unsure: the library API and ABI would be stable
enough, but upstream is not
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
NACK. While uscan can be considered an API, it looks much like an
implementation to me. The API you get with it is that you can call
uscan with its parameters, but you cannot implement that API with
anything else. An API is something I expect to be able to
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:14:25AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes:
I would not be against a recommendation in policy to implement
direct-from-vcs upstream tarballs to be created vbia
On Mar 17, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Please do not as it will allow users which need to access Thinkpad-specific
devices (== /dev/nvram) access to /dev/{mem,kmem,port}. That's a huge security
Other distributions apparently solved this.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
(No need to CC: me on either debian-devel or debian-i18n, thanks.)
Time to launch the debate on the Draft TDeb Specification - DEP-4.
Current HTML form: http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/tdeb/
SGML form for modification: svn://svn.debian.org/dep/web/deps/
(Draft.sgml - please notify me if the
On Tue, Mar 17 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
What are the pros mentioned by Manoj that are specific to the Makefile
snippet approach except the fact that we can continue to call debian/rules
directly on all packages ?
That by itself is reason enough, I think.
Secondly, I have
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 16:51, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian-ba.org wrote:
Hi,
Is there any trick to getting a package into Debian after its removal from all
the suites? Or should we consider the regular process for a new package by
filing an ITP?
Regular process (but the previous
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 21:29 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
The DebianWiki team is pleased to announce that the wiki is now running
moinmoin 1.7, which brings many new features (see [1] and [2]).
IMHO this announcement should have gone to debian-devel-announce - but
nevertheless, thanks for
Hi,
Is there any trick to getting a package into Debian after its removal from all
the suites? Or should we consider the regular process for a new package by
filing an ITP?
Regards,
--
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
http://tiagovaz.org
0xA504FECA - http://pgp.mit.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, Mar 16 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And you are missing the point that making people type stuff on
the command line for site specific stuff looses out to being able to
edit a conffile instead.
Who said the command line was for
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 17, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Please do not as it will allow users which need to access Thinkpad-specific
devices (== /dev/nvram) access to /dev/{mem,kmem,port}. That's a huge
security
Other distributions
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:42:37AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
- call the shared library package libgribapi0d, adding the extra d to
signify that it is a Debian specific shared library: that way, the
name a future library provided by upstream will not conflict
- at that point, I can do
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:29:17PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 16:51, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian-ba.org
wrote:
Hi,
Is there any trick to getting a package into Debian after its removal from
all
the suites? Or should we consider the regular process for a
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:34:49PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
IMHO this announcement should have gone to debian-devel-announce - but
nevertheless, thanks for the fine work. :)
Thanks indeed. ... for d-d-a we can always drop a line at
http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews
I'll let Frank Lin
* Richard Atterer [Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:34:17 +0100]:
At the very least, there should be an auto-generated web page listing
packages in testing that are currently unreleasable!
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00836.html
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory
* Raphael Geissert [Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:32:51 -0600]:
Removing GNOME from testing because something depends on libfrufru1 isn't
a win for testing's usability.
It would only last until it is able to migrate without breaking anything. I
think this is just a matter of deciding which way is
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I think it would be very helpful if somebody could summarize why a
multiarch system is useful, except for the obvious case of installing
proprietary i386 software on amd64 systems.
Most applications don't really need the
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
not before. This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
stable releases. If we don't get things moving in parallel it will
never be ready
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: g3dviewer
Version: 0.2.99.5~svn113
Upstream Author: Markus Dahms m...@automagically.de
URL: http://automagically.de/g3dviewer/
License: GPL-2+
Description: 3D model viewer
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
1) How to specify an arch in sources.list?
Don't. Specify it in apt.conf
Suggestion:
deb
I have a number of ARM devices/boards that I no longer need and I'm
looking for developers or testers who can do something useful with
them. Those devices have been given to me to improve Debian support,
and so they should be used for Debian related activities
(debian-installer tests and
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:05:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I have a number of ARM devices/boards that I no longer need and I'm
looking for developers or testers who can do something useful with
them. Those devices have been given to me to improve Debian support,
and so they should be
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
not before. This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
stable
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:29:08PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I think it would be very helpful if somebody could summarize why a
multiarch system is useful, except for the obvious case of installing
proprietary i386 software
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
not before. This is after it
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 17, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
This is the thinkpad /dev/nvram stuff, right? I thought for some tpctl
I think so.
The rationale for this change is harmonization with all other
distributions.
On its own, that's
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:29:08PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I think it would be very helpful if somebody could summarize why a
multiarch system is useful, except for the obvious case
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:36:07AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
# in debian/rules
-include /etc/buildpackage.mk
It seems to me that you are indeed close, but with the exception of
this required include in all our debian/rules, which will be a PITA to
achieve. AFAIU Raphael's proposal, the
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:04:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:42:37AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
- call the shared library package libgribapi0d, adding the extra d to
signify that it is a Debian specific shared library: that way, the
name a future library
On Tue, Mar 17 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:36:07AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
# in debian/rules
-include /etc/buildpackage.mk
It seems to me that you are indeed close, but with the exception of
this required include in all our debian/rules, which will be
Current HTML form: http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/tdeb/
So do I understand correctly that there might be one .tdeb per package
and per language unless maintainers merge regularly the contents into
their source packages? How many .tdebs files does that imply in the
main archive?
It
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:22:19 +0100
Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org wrote:
Current HTML form: http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/tdeb/
So do I understand correctly that there might be one .tdeb per package
and per language unless maintainers merge regularly the contents into
their source
Jean-Yves Avenard dijo [Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 09:11:05PM +1100]:
Please mail your questions about packaging to
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org.
I'm not sure I like to classify as newbie
It is not about classification - it is about the right place to ask
things, as otherwise we drown in
Hello Goswin et al,
IMHO, the things you are talking about are quite nice. They way it
works sounds to me a little complex, that it is very close to the idea
of crosscompiling, as the *right way*, as opposed to accumulate dirty
hacks and workarrounds that it is what most embedded distros do out
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org
* Package name: libtest-fixme-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Edmund von der Burg e...@ecclestoad.co.uk
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Fixme/
* License : GPL/Artistic
Martín Ferrari dijo [Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 02:30:18PM -0300]:
Hi,
Luk Claes and me, as the current maintainers of net-tools, we've been
thinking about it's future. Net-tools has been a core part of Debian and
any other linux based distro for many years, but it's showing its age.
(...)
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:30 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Oops... I strongly suggest providing a wrapper that matches netstat's
format as closely as possible (even bug-for-bug if possible). Netstat
is probably among the most used tools by sysadmins and programmers
alike, both for software we
ÐÏࡱá
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Mar 17 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
Do you prevent mixing old and new .debs and .tdebs?
Changes to translations use +t1.diff.gz etc.
How do you merge data from a new package into the tdeb data?
The real question is how to get apt to understand getting the
+t1.diff.gz when asked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:23:03 -0400
Source: jsmath
Binary: jsmath
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.6b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com
Changed-By: Yaroslav Halchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:06:21 +0100
Source: microcode.ctl
Binary: microcode.ctl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.17-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giacomo Catenazzi c...@debian.org
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:20:34 +1100
Source: tth
Binary: tth
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.85-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ian Maclaine-cross i...@debian.org
Changed-By: Ian Maclaine-cross i...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:39:22 +0100
Source: kdepim
Binary: kdepim kdepim-dbg kdepim-doc akonadi-kde akregator libkabcommon4
kaddressbook kalarm kdepim-kresources kdepim-groupware kdepim-wizards kleopatra
kmail knode knotes kode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:22:00 +0100
Source: btrfs-tools
Binary: btrfs-tools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.18-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:09:34 -0400
Source: openct
Binary: libopenct1-dev libopenct1 libopenct1-dbg openct
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:46:54 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-base0.10
Binary: gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-apps gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-doc
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev
gstreamer0.10-alsa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:24:47 +1100
Source: hplip
Binary: hplip hplip-data hplip-gui hplip-dbg hplip-doc hpijs-ppds hpijs
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.9.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian HPIJS and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:18:05 +
Source: git-core
Binary: git-core git-doc git-arch git-cvs git-svn git-email git-daemon-run
git-gui gitk gitweb
Architecture: all source
Version: 1:1.6.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:42:32 +
Source: djbdns
Binary: djbdns dbndns dnscache-run
Architecture: all source
Version: 1:1.05-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:44:03 +1100
Source: digikam
Binary: digikam showfoto digikam-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:0.9.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:03:38 +0100
Source: lustre
Binary: linux-patch-lustre lustre-source lustre-utils lustre-tests liblustre
lustre-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.6.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:40:06 +0100
Source: italc
Binary: italc-master italc-client libitalc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:51:44 +0100
Source: mc
Binary: mc mc-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:4.6.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian MC Packaging Group pkg-mc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:17:58 +1100
Source: digikam
Binary: digikam showfoto digikam-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:0.10.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:30:53 +1100
Source: kipi-plugins
Binary: kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:21:11 +0100
Source: aria2
Binary: aria2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Ruckstuhl patr...@tario.org
Changed-By: Patrick Ruckstuhl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:02:33 +0100
Source: wormux
Binary: wormux wormux-data
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 1:0.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:21:13 +0100
Source: libmtp
Binary: libmtp8 libmtp-dev libmtp-doc mtp-tools
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.3.7-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rafael Laboissiere raf...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:47:42 +
Source: emdebian-tools
Binary: emdebian-tools emdebian-buildsupport emdebian-archive-keyring
emdebian-archive-keyring-udeb emdebian-rootfs emdebian-qa emdebian-grip-server
emdebian-grip emdebian-tdeb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:37:23 +
Source: base-passwd
Binary: base-passwd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.5.21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org
Changed-By: Colin Watson
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
