-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:28:22 -0800
Source: gtk+1.2
Binary: libgtk1.2-dev libgtk1.2-doc libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-dbg
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 22:54:04 +0800
Source: libtabe
Binary: libtabe0 libtabe0-dev libtabe-db
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.1.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:38:12 -0600
Source: bc
Binary: dc bc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.05a-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL
Robert Luberda wrote:
dpkg 1.8.1, which was installed a few hours ago, comes with broken
dpkg-source. You can't make your packages with it.
Please see #81152 and #65021 for more info.
Hmm, I just built a diff.gz with it and it is fine. Does the bug only
occur under some circumstances?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian May) writes:
Does bind come with multiple libraries?
Yes. Four, I think.
Ok, I haven't looked at our policies for shared libs for a while, and I
obviously have some reading to do. Thanks for the warnings.
Bdale
To get the mail-followup-to header to work in Mutt you must use
the subscribe command and not the lists command to indicate which
mailing lists your on. If you use lists then Mutt thinks you are
not on the list and adds your address to the mail-followup-to
hedaer.
It took me a while to figure
Joey Hess wrote:
Robert Luberda wrote:
dpkg 1.8.1, which was installed a few hours ago, comes with broken
dpkg-source. You can't make your packages with it.
Please see #81152 and #65021 for more info.
Hmm, I just built a diff.gz with it and it is fine. Does the bug only
occur under
Argh. I just grepped every source package in the archive, and these are
broken:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/ftp.debian.org/ftpfind |grep diff.gz | xargs zgrep -l
'+++ /dev/null'
./pool/main/d/docbook-stylesheets/docbook-stylesheets_1.60-1.diff.gz
./pool/main/g/guppi/guppi_0.35.2-4.diff.gz
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:48:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I have to wonder if it is really worth having a different name for the
newer package version. Are the versions really that different?
Personally, I would prefer to have apt-get automatically upgrade the
package, and that will be
Hi,
Due to lack of time on my part, but more importantly due to a
discontinuation of upstream development, I'm orphaning my packages 'wterm' and
'wterm-ml'.
If anyone wants to take over this package, please let me know.
Regards, happy new year, etc..
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:08:44PM +, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 19:03:45 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
- x25tap
- kerneli crypto patches
- ReiserFS
In that case ReiserFS is a really bad example, it might never
On Jan 06, Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the same error. Perhaps the Mutt manual should be updated to
make this more clear.
README.Debian.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 01:05:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Happy new year from this side of the world,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Three packages (w3mir, webmin, and fancylogin) that were definitely
available in Debian main some time ago, and that
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:57:07PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Please don't encourage private mirrors!
I have been the administrator of ftp.it.debian.org since a long time,
and I notice there are many sites doing nightly mirrors for their own
use.
I believe their own use is a bit too broad.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:04:52PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for
auto-generating lilo.conf files.
Presumably, if there is a /etc/lilo.conf file already on the system, you
will ask whether to
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
boot=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard
kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very
sure that it will work.
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even
worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a
totally different meaning.
This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a
critical bug, since
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard
kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very
sure that it will work.
He shouldn't assume it even if debian standard kernel package uses it.
A
Scott Ellis wrote:
Of course the -I option to tar was completely non-standard. The changelog
explains why it changed, to be consistant with Solaris tar. I'd prefer
portability and consistancy any day, it shouldn't take that long to change
any custom scripts you have. I always use long
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
So: Is there a *technical* reason to change /etc/debian_version other
than it being just nicer?
This information could instead be stored in /etc/lsb-release. One of
the reasons for the creation of this file was to standardise across
the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 06:06:47AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
Just FYI, as of now, the package available in sid/unstable does NOT ask
to save your /etc/lilo.conf. If you install the current deb backup your
lilo.conf file first.
If you've done the upgrade already note that it does save it
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:13:22AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 06, Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the same error. Perhaps the Mutt manual should be updated to
make this more clear.
README.Debian.
ITYM README.UPGRADE.
--
- mdz
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:08:05PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Please verify lilo.conf by hand and send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, [EMAIL PROTECTED] would really be better than a specific address.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:08:05PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Please verify lilo.conf by hand and send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, [EMAIL PROTECTED] would really be better than a specific address.
Not if he isn't the current maintainer of
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard
kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it is very
sure that it will work.
Santiago Vila writes:
This information could instead be stored in /etc/lsb-release. One of
the reasons for the creation of this file was to standardise across
the distributions the name and format of the file which contains this
type of information.
Interesting. Is that file in /etc
== esoR ocsirF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to set up our local partial mirror to run without
attendance through multiple releases. If I hard code the
release candidate name into the mirror script, wont it just
break when testing goes stable?
The problem is
== Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May 19-20 Berliner Linux Infotage
http://www.belug.org/infotage/
Intresting. Gotta check my calendar for a vistit to my parents in
Berlin during that time.
July 5-8 LinuxTag 2001, Stuttgart http://www.linuxtag.org/
On Jan 06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmpmount -o loop foo 1
Why don't we just patch mount to use /var/run/mtab?
I don't know about any other program which modifies it.
--
ciao,
Marco
== Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, would anyone object if I made the diskless package
depend on devfs support from 2.4.x in future versions?
Please do.
MfG
Goswin (a devfs fan).
== Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin Brederlow wrote: the Author of tar changed the --bzip
option again. This time its even worse than the last time,
since -I is still a valid option but with a totally different
meaning.This totally changes the behaviour
On Sunday 07 January 2001 00:46, Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:08:05PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Please verify lilo.conf by hand and send comments to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, [EMAIL PROTECTED] would really be better than a
Hi,
there is a bug in the mc package, that most likely is related to
devfs. I can't reproduce it, nor does it seem to be common.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=57557repeatmerged=yes
mc hangs occasionally on starup on the VC.
There is a patch on the buttom of the report.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
This information could instead be stored in /etc/lsb-release. One of
the reasons for the creation of this file was to standardise across
the distributions the name and format of the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmpmount -o loop foo 1
Why don't we just patch mount to use /var/run/mtab?
I don't know about any other program which modifies it.
because /var is not always on
Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the -I option to tar was completely non-standard. The
changelog explains why it changed, to be consistant with Solaris tar.
I don't see the reasoning in the changelog, but I may just have missed
it.
I'd prefer portability and consistancy any day,
Hi all,
as of three days ago, every attempt to do a dist-upgrade tries to uninstall
almost every kde package. What is wrong there.
Maybe the package maintainer knows ?
Thanks in advance
Greetings
Michael Meding
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2001 00:46, Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Also, [EMAIL PROTECTED] would really be better than a specific
address.
Not if he isn't the current maintainer of lilo.
True.
So how do I get registered as
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2001-01-06
Severity: important
After I upgraded from potato to woody on
an i386 machine, I observed a strange sympton
I login as root. It doesn't matter where, console, X or
from network...
When I check the environment, normal user environment is
present.
Quoting Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
== Sami Haahtinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or, can rsync sync binary files?
Of cause, but forget it with compressed data.
Doesn't gzip have a --rsync option, or somesuch? Apparently Andrew
Tridgell (Samba, Rsync) has a patch to do this,
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-9
Severity: important
When I try to start X server as a user, the X server complains that
the authorization has failed and terminates. Likewise when
trying to login from gdm (tried other display managers, too)
I can't paste anything now but as far as I can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as of three days ago, every attempt to do a dist-upgrade tries to uninstall
almost every kde package. What is wrong there.
Use dselect or some apt frontend to find out what the conflicts are or
what dependencies are missing. It's easier for you to do this work
yourself
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:42:30AM -0500, Scott Ellis wrote:
Of course the -I option to tar was completely non-standard. The changelog
explains why it changed, to be consistant with Solaris tar. I'd prefer
portability and consistancy any day, it shouldn't take that long to change
any custom
reassign 81397 gdm
thanks
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:20:42PM +0200, Eray 'exa' Ozkural wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.0.1-9
Severity: important
When I try to start X server as a user, the X server complains that
the authorization has failed and terminates. Likewise when
trying
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:36:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
reassign 81397 gdm
thanks
hi branden,
if you read the bug report carefully, you'll see that
I complain about not being able to login from *anywhere*
including gdm.
I'm working on it now, and it seems I can't start X
as a
Package: wnpp
Severity: whishlist
It seems like this package have not been packaged yet. Even if quite a lot
of packages needs it.
Url: http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/bsf/
License: IBM Public License (is that an ok license?), url:
Scripsit Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: whishlist
ATTENTION! The original message was cc:ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in addition to two Debial mailing lists. Subscribers to these lists
risk inadvertantly opening new unrelated bug numbers if they use a
standard wide reply
Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: Why not change the Solaris version to be compatible with the
widely used linux version? I'm sure there are more people and tools
out there for linux using -I then there are for solaris.
One point the maintainer has made on the gnu mailing lists in
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Anyway, here is what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ startx
X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting.
xinit: unexpected signal 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Is this normal? Users could start their X servers before
upgrading a couple of
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:17:40AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
One point the maintainer has made on the gnu mailing lists in response
to complaints about this change is that there has actually been no
*released* version of gnu tar that uses -I for bzip (I don't know
whether it's true or not).
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:18:56PM +0100, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
You might be interested in RTFMing, or checking past bugs, or having
a look at /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config.
I did RTFM mf. Got any idea why this is happening? The problem is that
we just upgraded, didn't alter anything and ended
On Saturday 06 January 2001 15:08, Joey Hess wrote:
Russell Coker wrote:
I have just uploaded LILO 21.6-2 to Woody. I have made it use debconf
for all the common settings (I can configure lilo.conf for all my
machines using only debconf). Please test it and let me know of any
other
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:20:58AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:17:40AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
One point the maintainer has made on the gnu mailing lists in response
to complaints about this change is that there has actually been no
*released* version of gnu tar
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:17:33PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: whishlist
ATTENTION! The original message was cc:ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in addition to two Debial mailing lists. Subscribers to these lists
risk
On Saturday 06 January 2001 16:22, Chris Rutter wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not?
There's absolutely no need or necessarily a desire to do so; besides
which, the point is moot: if you're in the automation arena, you'll
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
I did RTFM mf. Got any idea why this is happening? The problem is that
we just upgraded, didn't alter anything and ended up with a broken
xinit. How can this be possible?
Dunno. Shit may happen, you know. But I don't think it's worth Cc:ing
On 01-01-06 Goswin Brederlow wrote:
== Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
July 5-8 LinuxTag 2001, Stuttgart http://www.linuxtag.org/
http://www.infodrom.ffis.de/Debian/events/LinuxTag2001/
Already planed to be there.
I will be there any way, but I have to work out some
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard
kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:43:10AM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
I think that your argument is equivalent to someone complaining that
unstable is broken. Of course it is, nothing has been finalized and it
is, by definition, unstable. If you want stability, use the released
version, not
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:40:53PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our
Since solaris compat is now a release goal for tar, should we also
expect dramatic changes in the behavior of the following options?
(Some of these are actually supported on more platforms than just
solaris; gtar is the only oddball.)
F
i
k
l
o
P
--
Mike Stone
Hello
When I first installed Debian GNU/Linux on this machine, I reconfigured
it so that there is a central user-group called users which all
users of this system belong to.
I have now reconfigured it back to the default:
/etc/adduser.conf
[...]
USERGROUPS=yes
[...]
When running useradd,
This is my answer to a private mail (it seems...) I don't want to talk
about these in private. Please note the reason why I carried this bug
report to the list.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:59:31PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
You've already gotten into Branden's permanent shitlist.
Hello
Petr Èech wrote:
Adam Lazur wrote:
The ability to install more than one version of a package simultaneously.
Hmm. SO you install bash 2.04-1 and bash 2.02-3. Now what will be /bin/bash
2.04 or 2.02 version? You will divert both of them and symlink it to the old
name - maybe, but but how
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:52:54PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
/etc/adduser.conf
...
When running useradd, though, I get the following:
useradd and adduser are two different programs from two different pacakges,
the configuration of one does not affect the other:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:18:56PM +0100, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
You might be interested in RTFMing, or checking past bugs, or having
a look at /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config.
I did RTFM mf.
Clearly not, or you would know that XFree4 requires explicit
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmpmount -o loop foo 1
Why don't we just patch mount to use /var/run/mtab?
I don't know about any other program which modifies it.
If we use /var/run/mtab, how does mount update it when
== Martin Bialasinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, there is a bug in the mc package, that most likely is
related to devfs. I can't reproduce it, nor does it seem to be
common.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=57557repeatmerged=yes
mc hangs
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:29:35PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
What is this supposed to mean? There are many users here suffering from this
problem since this is a multi-user system and none of them have the time
to learn the peculiarities of x. They, and I, just want to use this stuff
and I
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not?
Adam kernel-package doesn't do them anymore.
This is not quite correct. The
== Thorsten Wilmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Petr Èech wrote:
Adam Lazur wrote:
The ability to install more than one version of a package
simultaneously.
Hmm. SO you install bash 2.04-1 and bash 2.02-3. Now what will
be /bin/bash 2.04 or 2.02 version? You
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Saturday 06 January 2001 16:22, Chris Rutter wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not?
There's absolutely no need or necessarily a desire to do so; besides
This is my answer to a private mail (it seems...) I don't want to talk
about these in private. Please note the reason why I carried this bug
report to the list.
Well, sorry but now you're in MY non-permanent (YET) shitlist for violating
netiquette, and I'll have to acknowledge that Branden Was
* Sven Burgener ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello
When I first installed Debian GNU/Linux on this machine, I reconfigured
it so that there is a central user-group called users which all
users of this system belong to.
I have now reconfigured it back to the default:
/etc/adduser.conf
[...]
Eray == Eray Ozkural (exa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eray This is my answer to a private mail (it seems...) I don't want to talk
Eray about these in private. Please note the reason why I carried this bug
Eray report to the list.
You have the gall to quote private email on a public
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell I have a new version online at http://www.coker.com.au/lilo/ . It
adds
Russell /boot/vmlinuz-* automatically and doesn't look for anything in the
root
Russell directory. Please try it out and let me know what you think.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
2a. Install (or recompile) the specific packages from unstable that fix the
bugs
That I should have done...
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:
Hi,
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell other=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
Russell label=part1
Russell table=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
Eh? I have an SCSI only machine which does not do devfs. Does
the postinst handle that?
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:43:15PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
You have the gall to quote private email on a public list, and
expect people to accord you any attention whatsoever? Have you ever
heard of nettiquette?
There is nothing personal in my reply and neither in quoted text
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Branden, please understand this for what it is meant: Branden does not like
to be poked. He seems to like even less to be poked by you. Please don't
poke him, he'll bite back and we get to watch the fallout.
Great kiss ass.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the moment, if there is no lilo.conf, the kernel-image
postinst creates a functioanl lilo.conf that takes into account
Is this wise?
I assume that in a perfect world the lilo package would be better to
configure itself than some random
Hi
I just want to ask if somebody knows if the maintainer is still
active. Gnucash have now quite a lot of bugs and there is a new
stable version. If he is not active anymore I'll gladly adopt this package.
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:44:01AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Josip Oh, of course. (Packages including several shared libraries
Josip suck as far as our naming scheme is concerned :o)
Does bind come with multiple libraries? If so, I think they should
really be split up, according to
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 08:56:41PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
You have the gall to quote private email on a public list, and
expect people to accord you any attention whatsoever? Have you ever
heard of nettiquette?
There is nothing personal in my reply and neither in quoted text
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Branden, please understand this for what it is meant: Branden does not like
to be poked. He seems to like even less to be poked by you. Please don't
poke him, he'll bite back and we
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
That mailing search stuff has some weird problems, yes. As for not being
written down anywhere, the postinst asks you about it. I think there is a
manpage for Xwrappers.config, but it's not installed in my system.
There is.
(this is not directed specifically at anyone)
I don't quite get this... This list is moderated. Is it not too much for
the moderator to moderate these postings and/or the user instead of
drawing hte hounds just because one guy things a bug should be in a
different spot?
Some logical discussion,
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:01:42PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Branden, perhaps the XFree4 server package should check if the
previously-installed version was a 3.3 server, and offer to set up the
Xwrapper.config file appropriately?
I considered this, but judged that the cost of writing a
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 08:28:53PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
There is nothing personal in my reply and neither in quoted text and
~~
Um, there is. The thing that caused you to say Great kiss ass to hmh.
Well, his answer to the
Peter == Peter Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the moment, if there is no lilo.conf, the kernel-image
postinst creates a functioanl lilo.conf that takes into account
Peter Is this wise?
You are asking my opinion? Absolutely.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:00:38PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Branden, please understand this for what it is meant: Branden does not like
to be poked. He seems to like even less to be poked by you. Please don't
poke him,
Hi Erik!
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001, Erik Hollensbe wrote:
I don't quite get this... This list is moderated. Is it not too much for
Not that I know of.
I have a hard time finding the logic in wasting your time complaing about
how your time is being wasted. What does this solve?
Humans are hardly
Hi,
Eray == Eray 'exa' Ozkural [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eray After I upgraded from potato to woody on
Eray an i386 machine, I observed a strange sympton
Eray I login as root. It doesn't matter where, console, X or
Eray from network...
Eray When I check the environment, normal user
Of course the -I option to tar was completely non-standard. The changelog
explains why it changed, to be consistant with Solaris tar. I'd prefer
portability and consistancy any day, it shouldn't take that long to change
any custom scripts you have. I always use long options for
Eray Ozkural (exa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The preprocessor macro seems to be undefined. There are also other
subtleties while using pthread lib, such as the __USE_UNIX_98 stuff,
which I really don't know (I only use c++, and UNIX_98 sections don't
seem to come along. Why is that?)
...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
worker is a two-paned directory utility much like the Amiga's
DirectoryOpus. License is GPL.
Home page: http://www.boomerangsworld.de/worker
Screenshots: http://www.boomerangsworld.de/worker/wscreenshots.php3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmpmount -o loop foo 1
Why don't we just patch mount to use /var/run/mtab?
I don't know about any other program which modifies it.
because /var is not always on the same partition as /
/etc/mtab shouldn't exist, all the information should be handled by the
kernel
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Changes in version 1.9.2:
Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
for Debian (Bug#8181).
oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before potato.
Russell Coker wrote:
Also currently if you don't have debconf configured to display high
priority messages then the configure phase of installation won't run. The
problem line is:
db_text high lilo/createdit
You probably want to use the 'note' data type, not 'text'. See the
debconf
Maybe I'm missing some important pieces, but is there someone who can
get this to work ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ik5pvx # ping6 fe80::250:4ff:fe38:a630
connect: Invalid argument
the address is the site-wide one automatically assigned to the eth0 of
another computer on the lan.
here's a strace
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
