Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/.
Looks good, but why the long binary name?
Wouldn't just `firebird' be nicer?
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm
Hi Everyone,
From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add:
deb http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/$(ARCH) ./
to your /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-g
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:25:20PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 May 2003 18:28:19 +1000
> > "AP" == Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AP>
> AP>
> AP> This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more
> parseable
> AP> format.
>
> DSA'a are
"Matt Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sending HTML emails its a general comment on people usage of the Internet.
> If you can limit yourself to contacts who are technical enough to understand
> the arguments why you don't like it then you can maintain the pretence that
> it doesn't exist. Those
On 19-May-03, 11:03 (CDT), Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VMS-style error codes occurred to me as well. Though if one goes
> that route, I wonder if gettext any longer has advantages over msgcat.
> :)
I realize you're being (at least somewhat) facetious, but if you
start with a
p.s. the version of python 2.2 is back at 2.2.1 compiled with gcc 2.95.4
(stable version)
the version that got into trouble was the python 2.2 that was compiled
with gcc 3.2 (unstable latest version?)
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:40:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [CC to debian-devel, did
-Original Message-
From: Brian Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 1:05 AM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
>>
>> If we're doing "let's have a conf where we
reopen 193287
reopen 193286
thanks
Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:30:39 +0200
> Source: pointless
> Binary: pointless
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.3-3
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Marco Presi (Zufus) <
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:17:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> (I'd quote a proverb about how small things lead to big things, but I
> can't currently think of any of those in English. :)
"Look after the pennies and the pounds will take care of themselves."
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
> > single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
> > sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
>
> There was no mention
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openoffice.org-thesaurus-de
Version : 20030512
Upstream Author : Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://thesaurus.kdenews.org/lang.php?lang=en
* License : GPL
D
Hello
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:43:02PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Kernel module policy:
> > -
> >
> > * Kernel modules must be provided as a "binary source" package.
> > * Module source packages should provide a debian/rules
Hi,
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
> > single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
> > sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
Hello,
I saw stunnel has not been uploaded since december 2001, so unstable
version
of stunnel is very old.
I use stunnel on all my computers, and I would like to take over the
package.
Is there any objection ? ( I sent a mail to current maintainer Paolo
Molaro
<[EMAIL
Emile van Bergen wrote
>I also don't understand the phrase "today's Internet world". You mean
>with the hordes running Outlook and shopping on the clickable amazing
>discoveries / quantum shopping / tell sell channel that's the WWW?
Yes. If you have to interact with them to any great extent then i
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
> single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
> sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
There was no mention of spammers in the thread! While they are prone to
[CC to debian-devel, did anybody see this behaviour on an update?]
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:52:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Never seen this upgrade behaviour. Was libgcc1 installed before
> > libstdc++5? If not, please could you explictely install
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> No, sorry - I'm afraid we'll first have to complete our search for the
> sheets of ".." before we can work on
> your request.
Do you realize that every time this is mentioned in the list archives, it
gets worse?
--
- mdz
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:06:20PM +1000, RedaComputer wrote:
> Could you please help me to find the website from where I am able to
> download steambox ripper.
No, sorry - I'm afraid we'll first have to complete our search for the
sheets of "dueling banjos" before we can work on your request.
Hello
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > I'll start here:
> >
> > Kernel package policy:
> "kernel image" to avoid confusion between kernel source, kernel headers,
Agreed.
> kernel modules, et
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kernel module policy:
> -
>
> * Kernel modules must be provided as a "binary source" package.
> * Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
> * The debian/rules file must compile the module if KSRC=kernelsourcedir
>
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Kernel module policy:
> > -
> > * Kernel modules must be provided as a "binary source" package.
> > * Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
> > * The debian/rules file must compile the mod
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:38:47AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> The main problem here is support. If uses e2fsck with NLS support
> enabled, and with a non-US locale, the messages will come out in their
> native language. Which is all very well-and-good until they run into
> problems and they s
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I'll start here:
>
> Kernel package policy:
"kernel image" to avoid confusion between kernel source, kernel headers,
kernel modules, etc.
> --
>
> * It should only exist one kernel-source package.
> * Every mo
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:55:37PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Highly technical packages like zebra, netfilter-related stuff and
> linux-atm are most likely to be used by people who know English. Not
> speaking English will make running routers and/or internet security
> systems almost impossible an
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
> that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
> are advised not to upgrade.
aptitude has nothing to do with
From: Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ITP: latex209 -- macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:50:39 +0200
> I am cc'ing this message to the debian-tetex-maint list. I think they
> would also like to know about this and will have a much bett
Hello Debian-devel, hello Takuo,
I patched Evolution 1.2.4 to be able to send attachments with a "mailto:";
URL. Simply use
evolution 'mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject=attachment&body=Hello%20list&attach=/path/to/file'
Please note that this functionality is enclosed in Evolution 1.3 b
> On Mon, 19 May 2003 18:28:19 +1000
> "AP" == Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AP>
AP>
AP> This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more parseable
AP> format.
DSA'a are available in RDF. There exists a link on the bottom of
www.debian.org/security to it.
-
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
I'm all for it, and GWU would be most excellent in my view. Of course,
I live just outside DC... ;)
Stephen
pgpSnD1TuI4Jx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:30:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > It's strange, because on my i386 system
> > > > objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
> > > >
> > > > 0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
> >
Hi,
Could you please help me to find the website from
where I am able to download steambox ripper.
Thanks,
Reda.
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:28:19PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> This would be made easier if the DSA's were obtainable in a more parseable
> format. Currently they're being retrieved from
> http://www.debian.org/security/ via a recursive wget.
Perhaps CVS would be easier?
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTE
As previously mentioned on this list, where I work, we have a sizeable
chunk of infrastructure that can't connect out to a Debian mirror[1]
One of my colleages has written a script, which works on the
/var/lib/dpkg/status file on a host that may require updating comparing it
against the
/var/l
Hello
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
*SNIP*
> Removing one kernel version and including another without rebuilding
> all modules packages will break several installations. Not removing
> the old packages will make the archive grow through time which will
> cause p
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
> I repost this because I got no feedback at all. I guess it shows that my
> email was long enough for not being read :)
Or there is no other comment from my side than: Go for it! It is an important
topic!
Kind regards
Andreas.
Hello,
I repost this because I got no feedback at all. I guess it shows that my
email was long enough for not being read :)
Thanks, Mt.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:29:00PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> In order to help the current discution to find an usefull conclusion, I
> would like to propo
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:02:18PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
>
> > On Friday 16 May 2003 11:45 am, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 May 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> > > > > more than once i had to install small dns servers on boxes
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > It's strange, because on my i386 system
> > > objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
> > >
> > > 0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
> > > 00045ebc gDF .text 014c Base_gdk_windowing_window_i
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
> * As mentioned, we have an enthusiastic sponsor lined up, which is a
> definite plus.
What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
food, flights and tshirts?
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
> [All Cc's removed]
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 07:54:55AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> [...]
> > I don't believe that there is not an estestic layout that can satisfy
> > all the languages we have in Debian.
>
> What is the rationale for having
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
>
> If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we
> have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
> nothern Virginia are myself.
>
> Too many con
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:29:14PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
> > Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
> > that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
> > are advised not to upgrade.
> Huh? What's aptitude got to do with python-apt?
>
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.2.11.1-3
> Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2, libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libncurses5 (>=
> 5.2.20020112a-1), libsigc++0, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>= 1:2.95.4-0.010810)
Okay, I feel like an idiot. It's supposed to be a
44 matches
Mail list logo
