Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: wmail
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Sven Geisenhainer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dockapps.org/file.php/id/70
* License : Seems specific, but free and probably
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Guillaume Pellerin wrote:
Jackbeat is an audio sequencer with the following features :
* drummachine-like interface for fast and easy edition
edition doesn't mean the same thing in English as in French. I think the
word you want here is
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Julien Danjou wrote:
* Package name: wmail
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Sven Geisenhainer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dockapps.org/file.php/id/70
* License : Seems specific, but free and probably GPL-compatible
Description
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:23:02PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Is it still actively maintained upstream? It doesn't look that way.
I doubt that it's a good idea to add new software to debian when
upstream lost interest - unless you are prepared to take that over too.
Yes, I am.
Regards,
--
Hi,
maintaining m-tx, I would like to move from the p2c generated C sources
to the original upstream Pascal sources (better suited for patches,
development, design, etc.).
m-tx is written in a Turbo Pascal dialect that can only be compiled with
fpc (not gpc).
Unfortunately, fpc in Debian
On 22/02/2005 at 10:11 Wouter Verhelst wrote...
snip
I agree that we should not continue to provide software for outdated
hardware platforms just for the sake of it; but as it is, there are
still people interested in m68k (some hobbyists, some embedded
developers, some who just use their old
* Roland Stigge:
Unfortunately, fpc in Debian produces statically linked binaries, due to
the Pascal unit style library files. We currently don't have other
packages in the archive that Build-Depend on fp-compiler (except fpc
itself which indeed carries statically linked binaries) as
From: Augustlt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED] gt;; br
--
Flozar Heart Health News:
Breakthrough Natural Cholesterol Reduction System:
No Dangerous side effects such as dizziness,
After another gruelling discussion on #debian-devel about the useless of
dehs and the lack of watch file (75,60% of non native debian packages
doesn't had one), I think that dehs is start to begin only my own
personal toys, so i'm thinking to stop it and to leave alioth resources
and put my
Hi Stefano,
Bluefuture wrote:
I know that there are a little bit group of people that think that the
old use of watch file could be converted in a Qa tools, but actually
i'm the only one that is trying to find a solution that could fix that
lack of watch file.
But without maintainers interest,
Hi,
Trying to upgrade a woody system to sarge, I experienced problems
upgrading libgtk2.0-0, and discovered that this packages was
self-depending. Afetr forcing the upgrade with dpkg -i --force-depends,
everything went smoothly. So I filed a bug against libgtk2.0-0.
Then I discovered that I
Hello,
I am currently maintaning pdftohtml in Debian, but I would like for someone
else to take over maintenance[1].
Lately, a few security related bugs have come up. They have been fixed in
NMU's, which has apparently introduced bugs causing segfaults. I haven't had the
time to research the
Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
So, if anyone uses or cares about pdftohtml, please step up, otherwise I will
work out an arrangement with the maintainer of the depending package mentioned
above.
I use pdftohtml in a private project (actually only pdftohtml -xml for
its XML output) and will adopt
Christoph == Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christoph As I understood it, the question was about moving stuff
Christoph from debian/tmp to debian/package. The stuff in
Christoph debian/tmp should get removed by the clean target
Christoph anyway, so it doesn't hurt to
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:05:01 +1100]:
A benefit of moving files, rather then copying, is that you get to see
at a glance what files your package left behind and missed in
debian/tmp (e.g. if upstream adds new files to the packages but
doesn't document these additions).
FWIW, there
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin Not everyone likes maildir; I gave up on it after
Colin experimenting with it and realising that making it harder
Colin for myself to use standard Unix text-processing tools on my
Colin mailboxes was just too annoying. This is
Rudy Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding this issue I was thinking about it since I've faced in a
situation where a package[0] I maintain does have high hardware
requirements, which led me to think if it is really wise to have it
with arch: any since probably in some arches it would not
can't help but chime in here :)
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:22:30AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Not every situation warrants using maildir, it uses a large number of
inodes, is slow to scan (yes, mbox isn't very good either),
inefficient at storing large number of very small files (due to block
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: radeontool
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Frederick Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://fdd.com/software/radeon/
* License : zlib license
Description : utility to
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Viehmann said:
Hi Stefano,
Bluefuture wrote:
I know that there are a little bit group of people that think that the
old use of watch file could be converted in a Qa tools, but actually
i'm the only one that is trying to find a solution that could fix that
Il giorno lun, 28-02-2005 alle 00:10 +0100, Luigi Gangitano ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: radeontool
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Frederick Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Scripsit Bluefuture [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no reason to put more work and effort on a community tool that
community itself consider useless.
The community might start considering it less useless if an
explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually
available. In particular,
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 18:19 -0500, sean finney wrote:
can't help but chime in here :)
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:22:30AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
[snip]
figuring the average email is about 13-15k, i believe an ext2/ext3
That seems awfully huge. In my (Maildir) archive of d-u, the
average
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 18:19 -0500, sean finney wrote:
recent versions of kernel/ext2/ext3 have built-in dirent hashing, which
cuts heavily on the many-files penalty. another benefit of maildir
is that when you modify a single
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:54 +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 18:19 -0500, sean finney wrote:
recent versions of kernel/ext2/ext3 have built-in dirent hashing, which
cuts heavily on the many-files penalty.
I know that I thougt dehs per se not too useful, but the watch section
on qa.d.o has inspired me to write watch files for two of my packages.
Not much (2 out of 7), admittedly, but I think that it's fairly useful.
I think the experimental columns are overkill (as people packaging
experimental
The community might start considering it less useless if an
explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually
available. In particular, why should a maintainer care about watch
files if he uses something else than uscan to keep track of upstream
happenings?
From time to time, these
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Of course, all of these factors depend on the file system used. I am
confident somebody could point out a file-system that eliminates many
Reiserfs, of course.
You meant XFS, right?
(Sorry, couldn't be helped. :)
--
Glenn
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 20:54 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Of course, all of these factors depend on the file system used. I am
confident somebody could point out a file-system that eliminates many
Reiserfs, of course.
You
Scripsit Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:54 +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
I thought it was illegal to modify a message.
Status: O?
I don't know what that means.
It means that the message is not marked 'new'. Many MUA's keep track
of message flags by inserting this
Scripsit Bluefuture [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should*
care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
understanding of your intentions?
This is not true.
You are
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 02:05 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:54 +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
I thought it was illegal to modify a message.
Status: O?
I don't know what that means.
It means that the message is not marked
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
That seems awfully huge. In my (Maildir) archive of d-u, the
average size is 4,959 bytes. Of course, there are no html mails.
Though, even in my Evolution list archive, where there are many
more html-mails, the average size is
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 22:26 -0500, sean finney wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
That seems awfully huge. In my (Maildir) archive of d-u, the
average size is 4,959 bytes. Of course, there are no html mails.
Though, even in my Evolution list archive, where
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: wmansied
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Walter Schreppers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~wschrep/ansied/
* License : GNU General Public Licence
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
It means that the message is not marked 'new'. Many MUA's keep track
of message flags by inserting this header into the message.
You mark a message as new by moving it to the new directory, and mark it
as seen with the cur directory. Flags are normally
On 02/27/2005 11:15 PM, Henning Makholm wrote:
Now you have a third reply: Explain why people should care, and
someone might actually start caring.
The core idea of dehs (as I understand it) is to keep track of
differences between the current upstream and Debian package versions. In
the long run
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rudy Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding this issue I was thinking about it since I've faced in a
situation where a package[0] I maintain does have high hardware
requirements, which led me to think if it is really wise to have it
with
Scripsit Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing a select all, and mark as read on a multi-GB mbox file
sounds painful.
Indeed. Or just mark the first (or any) message as read.
If one's MUA is the version of mutt shipped with woody one gets twice
the pain because it will *first* write the updated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: duhdraw
Version : 2.7.7
Upstream Author : Walt Stoneburner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/penberg/duhdraw/
* License : GNU Copyleft
Scripsit Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
It means that the message is not marked 'new'. Many MUA's keep track
of message flags by inserting this header into the message.
You mark a message as new by moving it to the new directory,
That's for a
Scripsit Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/27/2005 11:15 PM, Henning Makholm wrote:
Now you have a third reply: Explain why people should care, and
someone might actually start caring.
The core idea of dehs (as I understand it) is to keep track of
[snip explanation]
But why did I have to
On 02/28/2005 01:08 AM, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/27/2005 11:15 PM, Henning Makholm wrote:
Now you have a third reply: Explain why people should care, and
someone might actually start caring.
The core idea of dehs (as I understand it) is to keep track of
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:35:40AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
Now that you have this information, do you think dehs could be useful?
Do others think something like dehs could be useful?
As a general tool? Maybe, but how is it better than uscan, which it
duplicates?
As a website? No, not really.
On 02/28/2005 02:02 AM, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:35:40AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
Now that you have this information, do you think dehs could be useful?
Do others think something like dehs could be useful?
As a general tool? Maybe, but how is it better than uscan, which
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:54:46AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
The core idea of dehs (as I understand it) is to keep track of
differences between the current upstream and Debian package versions. In
the long run dehs is intended to gather and present more information
than just the numerical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:56:00 +
Source: imagefs
Binary: imagefs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.03-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:12:29 +0100
Source: wmsetimon
Binary: wmsetimon
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:10:09 -0800
Source: gmailfs
Binary: gmailfs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:59:44 +
Source: cantus
Binary: cantus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.07-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:37:14 +
Source: apg
Binary: apg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:41:16 +0100
Source: udev
Binary: udev udev-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.054-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:12:12 +0100
Source: module-assistant
Binary: module-assistant
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:19:46 +
Source: lapack
Binary: lapack-doc lapack lapack-test lapack-pic lapack-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.0.2531a-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:41:44 +
Source: blas
Binary: blas-test blas-dev blas blas-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.1-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Camm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:00:22 +
Source: atlas
Binary: atlas2-base-dev atlas2-3dnow-dev atlas2-sse2-dev atlas2-sse-dev
atlas-doc atlas2-sse atlas2-headers atlas-test atlas2-3dnow atlas2-base
atlas2-sse2
Architecture: source i386 all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:17:25 +
Source: lapack99
Binary: lapack99-dev lapack99
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Camm Maguire [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:31:56 +0100
Source: scilab
Binary: scilab-bin scilab-doc scilab
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.0-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:25:48 +0100
Source: binstats
Binary: binstats
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.08-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Javier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:31:23 +0100
Source: module-assistant
Binary: module-assistant
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:22:11 +0100
Source: gandalf
Binary: gandalf-dev gandalf1 gandalf-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:04 +0100
Source: cron-apt
Binary: cron-apt
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:27:29 +0100
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Debian Octave Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:11:40 -0500
Source: hdparm
Binary: hdparm hdparm-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stephen Gran [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:53:10 +0100
Source: debarchiver
Binary: debarchiver
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:11:45 +0100
Source: mol-modules-2.6.8
Binary: mol-modules-2.6.8-powerpc-smp mol-modules-2.6.8-powerpc
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.8+11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:30:01 +1100
Source: gtksourceview
Binary: libgtksourceview-dev libgtksourceview-common libgtksourceview1.0-0
libgtksourceview-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.1.92-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:16:33 +1100
Source: balsa
Binary: balsa
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:07:04 +0100
Source: octave-forge
Binary: octave-forge
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2004.11.16-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Debian Octave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Debian Octave Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:26:17 +0100
Source: gnome-icon-theme
Binary: gnome-icon-theme
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:49:32 +0100
Source: lvm2
Binary: clvm lvm2-udeb lvm2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.01.04-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian LVM Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian Blank [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:54:59 +0100
Source: isdnutils
Binary: isdnvbox isdnlog isdnutils isdneurofile isdnutils-xtools isdnutils-base
isdnvboxserver isdnutils-doc isdnactivecards isdnlog-data pppdcapiplugin ipppd
libcapi20-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:27:27 +0100
Source: libgnome2-wnck-perl
Binary: libgnome2-wnck-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:10:45 +0100
Source: debian-edu-install
Binary: debian-edu-install-udeb debian-edu-install debian-edu-profile-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.646
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:33:05 +
Source: exim4
Binary: eximon4 exim4-daemon-custom exim4-daemon-heavy exim4-base exim4
exim4-daemon-light exim4-config
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4.50-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:44:03 +0100
Source: openldap2.2
Binary: libldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.23-0.pre3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:22:02 +0100
Source: gnomemeeting
Binary: gnomemeeting
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0+1.2.1cvs20050220-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:57:03 +0100
Source: tabextensions
Binary: mozilla-tabextensions
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13.2005022401-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:40:16 +0100
Source: gnubiff
Binary: gnubiff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:26:55 +0100
Source: gcc-avr
Binary: gcc-avr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:3.4.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:19:36 +0100
Source: avr-libc
Binary: avr-libc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:33:22 -0500
Source: speex
Binary: speex-doc libspeex-dev speex libspeex1
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A. Maitland Bottoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:50:26 +0100
Source: lurker
Binary: lurker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:42:42 +0100
Source: gcvs
Binary: gcvs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0final-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:58:11 +0100
Source: libusb
Binary: libusb-dev libusb-0.1-4
Architecture: source hppa i386 sparc
Version: 2:0.1.10a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:15:01 +0100
Source: potrace
Binary: potrace
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:05:00 +0100
Source: libgphoto2
Binary: libgphoto2-port0 libgphoto2-2-dev libgphoto2-2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:45:27 -0500
Source: kvirc
Binary: kvirc-dev kvirc-data kvirc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2:3.0.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robin Verduijn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:45:52 +0100
Source: tor
Binary: tor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.9.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:06:56 +0100
Source: gnustep-make
Binary: gnustep-make-doc gnustep-make-ogo gnustep-make
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.10.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:30:25 +
Source: rasqal
Binary: rasqal-utils librasqal0-dev librasqal0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:43:53 +
Source: redland-bindings
Binary: python2.3-librdf python2.2-librdf librdf-ruby librdf-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:18:36 -0500
Source: lwm
Binary: lwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:32:50 -0500
Source: gtkspell
Binary: libgtkspell-dev libgtkspell0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ari
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:43:00 +0100
Source: binutils-avr
Binary: binutils-avr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.15-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:59:46 +0100
Source: eagle-usb
Binary: eagle-usb-utils eagle-usb-modules-source eagle-usb-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cyril Martin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:51:48 +0100
Source: hddtemp
Binary: hddtemp
Architecture: source hppa i386 sparc
Version: 0.3-beta12-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:27:08 +0100
Source: libcharles0
Binary: libcharles0 libcharles0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.20050217-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:33:33 +0100
Source: libgtkada2
Binary: libgtkada-gl-2.4 libgtkada2-dev libgtkada-2.4 libgnomeada2-dev
libgnomeada-2.4 libgtkada2-doc libgtkada-glade-2.4
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.4.0-3
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
