Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: usbmount
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.zero-based.org/debian/usbmount.html
* License : GPL
Description : Automatically mount and unmount USB mass
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that the DAM
problem has been solved elegantly and efficiently.
Wrong, the BIGGEST problem is that we have so many
retitle 276148 ITP: nsis -- Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (modified for
debian)
retitle 276153 ITP: nsis -- Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (modified for
debian)
owner 276148 !
owner 276153 !
thanks for the banana republic :(
More info and a long description about the version I intend
(Moving to -project, as requested by Steve Langasek)
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that the DAM
problem has been solved elegantly and
severity 175077 wishlist
thanks
On Mar 07, Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco, what's your current feeling towards #175077 (non-PIC code in
libdv) that you submitted back then when prelink entered Debian? It's a
case of hand-optimized assembly in a multimedia lib, and here I've
Hi,
Does anyone know about the whereabouts of the mrtg maintainer, Shiju p.
Nair?
The package has bugs that are multiple years old and no recent uploads
by the maintainer.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mrtg
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08-Mar-05, 01:39 (CST), martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it can't be done... that's one thing. You can remove
knowledge of the medium from the system once it has been pulled
out. You cannot unmount it because it will already be removed by
the time that udev or any other
On 07-Mar-05, 17:46 (CST), David H?rdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o Revocation certificates for the gpg keys, are there arguments
for/against storing them on the usb key?
While you might store the revocation certificate (RC) on *a* key, I certainly
wouldn't store it on *the* key. If you
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 09:50]:
Scripsit Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also think that it would be a very good thing if we were to use our
collective discretion more often -- to say, for example, well, you could
call this source, but it's bloody horribly ugly and
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 14:50]:
Henning Makholm writes:
Yes, but we shouldn't act as if it was a _freedom_ problem.
If it was deliberately made bloody horribly ugly and painful in order to
make changing it difficult, it's a freedom problem.
There are sure to be
* Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to release
when it is ready. Under the current system, being ready means achieving
an enormous number of goals that benefit a very small number of users.
For sarge, the number of
Dear Debian developers,
I gather there are some people out there with MIPS little-endian
machines (from mipsel drop discussion) and Debian on it. Do huge shared
libraries (containing 4 symbols) work for you? I am currently
investigating an issue I have with my MIPS32r4, binutils 2.14.90,
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:52 +, Will Newton wrote:
Try the debian-uk list:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-uk
Perfect, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op za, 05-03-2005 te 18:55 +0100, schreef martin f krafft:
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.05.1840 +0100]:
ssh -i usualy helps.
not if you cannot influence how SSH is called.
TTBOMK, distcc is free software.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud
Op za, 05-03-2005 te 14:26 +0100, schreef Thiemo Seufer:
Steve Halasz wrote:
Hi,
I've sent a few emails over the last month to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting that grass be removed from
packages-arch-specific. But my pleas have fallen on deaf ears, or
perhaps
(Note: In order for this thread to prove useful I'm going to adhere to aj's
ObBug: rule [0]. This will also probably limit my answers somewhat and
prevent me from answering every post]
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
What's the purpose of NEW then? Why are
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
DD's and might prove interesting to others (including non-DD's such as
me).
I use a very
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:58 +, Ben Hill wrote:
In my home directory I create a symlink for /media/usbkey/ssh -
~/.ssh
and /media/usbkey/gnupg - ~/.gnupg.
It has to be said, this method isn't the most secure method by any
means, and I'm interested to hear other's approaches.
Cheers,
Ben
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:58 +, schreef Ben Hill:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David Hrdeman wrote:
first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
DD's and might prove interesting to
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:58:41PM +, Ben Hill wrote:
In my home directory I create a symlink for /media/usbkey/ssh - ~/.ssh
and /media/usbkey/gnupg - ~/.gnupg.
One can also use the --home flag to gpg.
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:07:02PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The only difference is that, rather than symlinking ~/.gnupg, I symlink
~/.gnupg/secring.gpg; that way, I can mount the USB key read-only, which
allows me to safely remove it while still mounted; my trustdb and public
keyring
Hello Joe,
* Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-08 11:25]:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:32 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Monday, 07 Mar 2005, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL
also sprach Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.08.1423 +0100]:
While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5 seconds,
say) alleviates this problem.
No it does not. You would be surprised how many people copy to and
remove the stick the same second that cp returns to the
Le Mardi 8 Mars 2005 16:15, martin f krafft a crit:
also sprach Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.08.1423
+0100]:
While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5
seconds, say) alleviates this problem.
No it does not. You would be surprised how many people copy to and
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:07 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The only difference is that, rather than symlinking ~/.gnupg, I
symlink
~/.gnupg/secring.gpg; that way, I can mount the USB key read-only,
which
allows me to safely remove it while still mounted; my trustdb and
public
keyring are
Wouter wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:58 +, schreef Ben Hill:
So, when I stick the dongle into the USB slot, the drive is
automatically mounted, and the symlinks point to my real key
directories.
When the key is out of the machine, my keys are safe offline.
This is also approximately
Hi!
Pierre Habouzit [2005-03-08 16:22 +0100]:
mount -o sync ... is then a solution, especially if you only put small
things, and that the performance loss is not too painfull.
That would be completely true if sync would hold what the name
promises. VFAT does not (completely) implement sync.
On Mar 08, 2005 at 14:40, Ben Hill praised the llamas by saying:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:52 +, Will Newton wrote:
Try the debian-uk list:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-uk
Perfect, thanks!
You may also want to join #debian-uk on OFTC too, which is where
On Mar 08, 2005 at 14:58, Ben Hill praised the llamas by saying:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
DD's and might prove
Hi,
* Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-08 15:24]:
Hello Joe,
* Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-08 11:25]:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:32 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Monday, 07 Mar 2005, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50 +0100, Nico
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount -o sync ... is then a solution, especially if you only put small=20
things, and that the performance loss is not too painfull.
Currently sync isn't supported on FAT (there are patches to provide
it). If you're using ext2/3, that isn't a problem.
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:21 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Marco Alfonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
Version : 0.4
[...]
This is a GTK+ 2.x engine based on Bluecurve. It features a modern
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:41 +, David Pashley wrote:
Ideally I want to keep the disk formatted as vfat so it is usable on
other operating systems and use an ext2 loopback filesystem. Getting
the
system to mount that is the hard part.
I initially had my stuff stored on a VFAT partition, and
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:50:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Without alsa-base installed, hotplug and discover will load both
modules, resulting in various disasters depending on the hardware. It's
not because things work with your setup that they are suitable for a
stable Debian release.
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:50 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
But instead of starting to be more than a little bit rude, you should
have tried to understand the meaning of the last sentence in my mail. I
think this is Ross' error, he should have used the usual procedure to
announce that he
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:01 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to release
when it is ready. Under the current system, being ready means achieving
an enormous number of goals that benefit a
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:33 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
I feel your pain. Its hard to keep all these buildd's for different
architectures up. That goes to the very heart of my point.
I'm not saying Debian should totally
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 15.55, Javier Fernndez-Sanguino Pea wrote:
Further: do not accept every package to enter Debian...
Should be done, but if ftp-maintainers take this decissions they get
bashed on the basis of them preventing freedom. And we're back again to
the pointless hot-babe
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
function: keep the archive running. No policy decisions should be made by
On 08-Mar-05, 09:15 (CST), martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.08.1423 +0100]:
While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5 seconds,
say) alleviates this problem.
No it does not. You would be surprised how many
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:50:05PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
function:
Sorry... I got your mail the first time, I am sorry I could not reply
to it sooner.
Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz dijo [Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:15:39PM +]:
Yes, I care about it. I use it on my laptop to have personalized
configurations for the places I connect to the Internet. For
David Moreno Garza dijo [Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:57:27PM -0600]:
Please look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, it's already in
the NEW queue. And hey, Ross, what about an ITP of your own?
What should Marco do then? He is learning how to make official Debian
packages, he is
Maybe new versions of packages already in the archive that depend upon
packages which are NEW
could somehow signal or automatically raise the priority of those said
packages waiting to get in.
I guess it's a common case, specially for new libraries, since it can
potentially hold important new
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted: a policy document that draws the lines (there will always be grey
areas, yes. But they can be made smaller than they are right now), with
processes that ensure that handling critical cases does not take 2 months
or more.
Yay for more
I discovered with some surprise that the 2.6 kernel does not come with
an archive version
of the NPTL pthreads library (ie., no libpthread.a). So, while
dynamically linked applications will link against NPTL by default,
building a statically linked application will not only link to
LinuxThreads by
hi christian,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
You might want to post a call for translations for the common
templates in the package, as I understand this package includes a set
of common templates.
yeah, this project aims at making life easier for three
Hi,
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
--disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
I've made a list of source packages that might have been build
with the
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
okay, i'll do that some time in the near future. i'd like to give a
final look over my templates to make sure that i like my own english
before i ask anyone to translate it though :)
Well, be sure that we will be critic towards your English too...even
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
to reply to my own post...
i was under the impression that because dbconfig-common was previously
in experimental that i wouldn't have problems related to the stalled
NEW queue, but i was wrong.
so you can get them here:
deb
ti, 2005-03-08 kello 13:00 -0800, Blunt Jackson kirjoitti:
Does anyone know if this is an intentional decision on the part of the
glibc/nptl crew to refuse to support static linking of the pthreads
library (perhaps due to ongoing development)?
I don't know the answer to your exact question,
martin f krafft wrote:
[This should have gone to d-d-a in the first place too, sorry]
(So should this - sorry!)
Hello, world.
This year's DPL debate will take place on Saturday, 19 March 2005,
at 23:00 UTC[0]. It will last for two hours. The meeting will take
place on the Freenode IRC network[1],
Hi,
I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
However, after I put a package into build/REDO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat build/REDO
acl2_2.9.1-1
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:51:48PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Comments about the templates:
wow... thanks for all these. i'll work on incorporating these suggestions
in with the next version, before i make a request for translations.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(Note: In order for this thread to prove useful I'm going to adhere to aj's
ObBug: rule [0]. This will also probably limit my answers somewhat and
prevent me from answering every post]
Why the need for being that pretentious?
On Tue,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
why.
You're ignoring people arguing the other side of the issue. For example,
in [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:33:05AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???) and said these are not going to release with
the rest of sarge? Would it reduce the time to test the installer? Any
RC bugs that were
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:55:15 +0200, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ti, 2005-03-08 kello 13:00 -0800, Blunt Jackson kirjoitti:
Does anyone know if this is an intentional decision on the part of the
glibc/nptl crew to refuse to support static linking of the pthreads
library (perhaps
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:36 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has
Hi Gergely,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between
architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is
the only distribution that supports all these many architectures. This
has
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:32:30PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Sorry... I got your mail the first time, I am sorry I could not reply
to it sooner.
There exist any alternative?
Most of the use I had seen for switchconf was regarding network
detection - that can be perfectly handled through
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:30:06AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
well, me wanting to do things the right way it ended up being a pretty
long script and i didn't think the list would appreciate random shell
scripts flying around. but, i'll go ahead and put it online:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:29:20AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 07-Mar-05, 17:46 (CST), David H?rdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o Revocation certificates for the gpg keys, are there arguments
for/against storing them on the usb key?
While you might store the revocation certificate (RC) on
hello,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:38:22AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
o when the usb key is inserted, the user is prompted for a password to
the encrypted loopback file which is then mounted, the ssh keys within
are fed to ssh agent, and the file is unmounted again.
you could easily
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
--disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
I've
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:36 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 23:01 +0100, schreef Frank Kster:
Hi,
I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
However, after I put a package into
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 17:58 -0500, schreef Joey Hess:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
why.
You're ignoring people arguing the
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:31:18AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also think that it would be a very good thing if we were to use our
collective discretion more often -- to say, for example, well, you could
call this source, but it's bloody
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I very well remember that mail. The key word in Clint's mail that
prompted my reply was 'current' (problems). d-i has been ported to all
our architectures now, which required a lot of work, and doing a d-i
release still requires quite some work to synchronise that among
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
function: keep the archive running.
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06.39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
There is another problem with NEW: The US laws.
Untill a package has been processed through NEW and a mail send to
some goverment agency Debian runs risk of violating the crypto export
laws.
I've already proposed this: if silly
Dear fellow package maintainers,
I need you help. I'm currently trying to NMU gnome-find so that this
package is no more a Debian native package, which is pointless. A kind
of QA work on a package with low activity (and a probably MIA maintainer).
So, I grabbed it 1.0.2-1 current version and
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I upload the .orig.tar.gz, diff.gz, .dsc and .changes files to the
upload queue, but I keep getting the following message when the
package is processed, saying me that gnome-find_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz is
not in the queue or in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:01:34 +0100
Source: sanitizer
Binary: sanitizer
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.70-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:30:12 +0100
Source: listadmin
Binary: listadmin
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:04:59 +0100
Source: poedit
Binary: poedit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Perrier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:47:32 +0100
Source: susv3
Binary: susv3
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:03:01 +
Source: xwrits
Binary: xwrits
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.21-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:16:52 +0100
Source: knetfilter
Binary: knetfilter
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.3.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Angel Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:52:55 +
Source: gossip
Binary: gossip
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:30:38 +1100
Source: perl
Binary: perl-base libcgi-fast-perl libperl-dev perl-debug perl-modules perl
libperl5.8 perl-suid perl-doc
Architecture: all i386 powerpc source sparc
Version: 5.8.4-8
Distribution:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:34:01 +0100
Source: cl-ppcre
Binary: cl-ppcre
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:57:32 +0100
Source: kino
Binary: kino
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.75-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:54:03 +0900
Source: gsfonts-wadalab
Binary: gsfonts-wadalab-common gsfonts-wadalab-mincho gsfonts-wadalab-gothic
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.20010409-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:12:26 +0100
Source: mol
Binary: mol mol-modules-source
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.9.70-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jens Schmalzing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:44:23 +
Source: nautilus-python
Binary: python-nautilus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:51:34 +0900
Source: im
Binary: im
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:148-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:01:26 +0100
Source: fox1.2
Binary: libfox1.2-dev libfox1.2 libfox1.2-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 01:00:36 +0200
Source: cups-pdf
Binary: cups-pdf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.0a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:16:28 +0100
Source: gettext
Binary: gettext-doc gettext gettext-base gettext-el
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:19:20 +0100
Source: susv2
Binary: susv2
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:09:15 -0500
Source: tintin++
Binary: tintin++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.93.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher Sacca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher Sacca [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:46:30 +0100
Source: debmake
Binary: debmake
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.7.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:12:55 +0100
Source: wzdftpd
Binary: wzdftpd-mod-perl wzdftpd-back-mysql wzdftpd-dev wzdftpd wzdftpd-mod-tcl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:55:25 +
Source: libpixman
Binary: libpixman1 libpixman1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dave Beckett
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
