Cambio de fecha

Queríamos avisarles que el seminario previsto para el 26 de Abril fue cambiado para el 3 de Mayo. Todos aquellos interesados, pueden iongresar a la web http://www.todosobreventas.com/semiexcelsior.html e inscribirse. Desde ya muchas gracias Mariana Mitchell Gerente de Operaciones www.todosobreven

Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code]

> > I'm wondering, what happens if you want to install MOST of the deps > > from source? Wouldn't it be better to have apt-build (using the > > "official apt algorithms") ask on a dep-by-dep basis whether you > > want it compiled from source or installed from a binary? > Which is basically what so

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

This one time, at band camp, Cedric Delfosse said: > * Package name: python-clamav > Version : 0.2.2 > Upstream Author : Alexandre Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://xael.org/norman/python/pyclamav/ > * License : GPL > Description : Python bindings

Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22

Hello! The Scheme programming language is notorious for its lack of standardization. The SRFI process[1] is trying to mitigate this problem. Particularily, SRFI 22[2], "Running Scheme Scripts on Unix", tries to standardize interpreter names for Scheme scripts. This is relevant to Debian as this int

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > We have daily builds and the normal upload in > > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/pool/unstable/main/amd64/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-images_20041227_amd64.tar.gz > > I guess you want that untared to > /dists/sarge/main/installer-amd64/ on the n

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

A Mennucc wrote: > mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at > http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge If you are familiar with Christian Marillat's unofficial packages from , would you mind summarising the major differences between his package and yours? I'm just cur

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:41PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at > http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge > > a. > > ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html Right, so as an mplay

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:40:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend > > on libmysqlclient10-dev: > > > > cyrus-sasl2 > > cyrus-sasl2-mit > Frozen. I will gladly update them

Bug#305753: acknowledged by developer (closing 305753)

m> You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly... Why was it closed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

VT6410 support?

Hi, I just got a new mobo, but the anoyning thing is that i'm running out of IDE ports, only one native port on the mobo, the other 2 come with VT6410. I found the via official driver but it seems it's quite out dated, and won't compile against my 2.6 kernel. Is there any alternative driver that c

Re: Status of PHP5?

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Romain Francoise wrote: > > I don't see any bonus in converting the YADA-based packages to the > > other build system. I don't understand why it might be a reason for > > rejection. > > Well, you co-authored yada, didn't you? Of course it sounds ideal to > you. But don't you

Re: Large ramdisks, kernel memory space issue

salman h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi All, > > I'm using a slightly modified Debian kernel along with > PXELinux to boot a machine over the network. > > My kernel's memory footprint is quite large (400 megs) > because it pre-allocates memory for some processes (in > the interest of speedier p

Re: Automatic testing of Debian packages

Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >... > Do there exist, any other kind of automatic tests that I have not > mentioned here? > > Anything else I have missed? > > Which errors are typical for Debian packages? This is important as > certain kinds of error will properly newer be caught autom

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) writes: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: >> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture >> --- >> >> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting >>

Re: Status of PHP5?

On 10270 March 1977, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > * easy way to manage the patches > * easy way to generate the packages for different Debian suites - > experimental/sid/sarge/woody - from one source (ifdef..else..endif) > * simple includes with macros so I don't need to write the same code 40 times

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Jochens wrote: >> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture >> --- >> >> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting >> team decided to release a version of sarge for am

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wasn't there a python-central project aiming at handling byte-compiling >> of python modules for any python version installed on a system? >> (like emacsen-common) > > That wouldn't work for most of the python packages, for which a C module > has to

Re: FTBFS for illegal archs

Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on > buildd's which architecure are not supported by the > software? > regards nico > > -- > Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF > http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http

Re: Status of PHP5?

Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't see any bonus in converting the YADA-based packages to the > other build system. I don't understand why it might be a reason for > rejection. Well, you co-authored yada, didn't you? Of course it sounds ideal to you. But don't you understand

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 22:48 +0200, Jérôme Marant a écrit : > > Please don't, unless this is really necessary. We already have enough > > duplicate python packages in the archive. Except for very widely used > > modules, there should only be a python-foo package, built against the > > default ver

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I will create the python2.1-clamav, python2.2-clamav, python2.3-clamav, >> and python2.4-clamav packages too. > > Please don't, unless this is really necessary. We already have enough > duplicate python packages in the archive. Except for very widel

Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code]

"Freddie Unpenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Your priority are your users, and if Debian has decided to focus >> > only on some key architectures it would be the best for them to >> > help them switching to Gentoo instead of hacking Debian to become >> > some cheap Gentoo clone for most a

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 22:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > [...] > > I will create the python2.1-clamav, python2.2-clamav, python2.3-clamav, > > and python2.4-clamav packages too. > > Please don't, unless this is really necessary. We already have enough > duplicate python packages in the

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture Yes! Very good move. Congrats. Keep it up. Greetings Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Status of PHP5?

Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 5. Your packages use a radically different build system (yada) that not >all developers are comfortable with (understatement); > > 6. Your packages include patches that may not be suitable for general >use in Debian (like Hardened PHP); I'm d

Re: Status of PHP5?

On Monday 25 of April 2005 19:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I cant see much coordination with existing php maintainer(s). As far as I > know they/he informed you about the project on alioth. Where is mailing list, the home page for the project, the CVS or SVN repository? I was sent to /dev/null. >

Re: ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 21:55 +0200, Cedric Delfosse a écrit : > * Package name: python-clamav > Version : 0.2.2 > Upstream Author : Alexandre Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://xael.org/norman/python/pyclamav/ > * License : GPL > Description : Py

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: >> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture >> --- >> >> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting >> team decided to relea

ITP: python-clamav -- Python bindings to ClamAV

* Package name: python-clamav Version : 0.2.2 Upstream Author : Alexandre Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://xael.org/norman/python/pyclamav/ * License : GPL Description : Python bindings to ClamAV This package add virus detection capabilities to P

Bug#306328: ITP: scavr -- Squid ClamAV Redirector

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: scavr Version : 1.6.3 Upstream Author : Michael Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.jackal-net.at/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=1 * License : GPL Description

Re: Status of PHP5?

On Monday 25 of April 2005 20:18, Romain Francoise wrote: > Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You forgot: > > 5. Your packages use a radically different build system (yada) that not >all developers are comfortable with (understatement); No one was interested in converting it to t

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Hello Kurt, thank you for the clarifications. On 05-Apr-25 19:49, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > gnustep-base - + does not build with gcc-3.3 (needs gcc >= 3.4) > It looks like it builds fine with gcc-3.3. But if my memory is >

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture > --- > > At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting > team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10270 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > The list used to be >200 packages long. It is now ~20 packages long. > > It was somewhere around 600. Showoff :-) (Thank you and the other ftpmasters for blasting through the

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On 10270 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > The list used to be >200 packages long. It is now ~20 packages long. It was somewhere around 600. -- bye Joerg "Paris Hilton" is a woman? Not a hotel? This thread gets more surreal with every post... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: Status of PHP5?

Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The facts are: [...] You forgot: 5. Your packages use a radically different build system (yada) that not all developers are comfortable with (understatement); 6. Your packages include patches that may not be suitable for general use in Debia

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:36:36PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > Does that mean amd64 installer come without a mailer by default? Or will the > amd64 installer install a different mailer? The problem is that the old version of libmysqlclient-lgpl was build before we switched to an nptl onl

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:53:50PM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote: > * Russ Allbery [Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:47:13 -0700]: > > > it's more clear what's going on; some packages are sitting, but most > > things are being approved very quickly. mplayer (and hot-babe) are among > > the ones that are sitting.

Re: Status of PHP5?

On 10270 March 1977, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > 1. The ftpmaster was a member of pkg-php project, he boycotts my work and > don't offer something else. Im not a member of the php project and I would have rejected it too, I dont think it has anything todo with jvw beeing intrested in php stuff...

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

* Russ Allbery [Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:47:13 -0700]: > it's more clear what's going on; some packages are sitting, but most > things are being approved very quickly. mplayer (and hot-babe) are among > the ones that are sitting. And as I learnt yesterday, some of the ones "sitting" are still there

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > There are still a few packages in sarge which fail to build from source > on amd64. Those packages will not be part of the amd64 release of sarge. I've made a list list on saterday too which included all patched versions in the

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FTP Assistants -- > member Randall Donald (NEW processing) > member Daniel Silverstone (NEW processing) > member Joerg Jaspert (NEW processing) > Am I correct in assuming "NEW processing" means this is what you guys > volunteered to handle

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Steve Langasek wrote: >> portslave- "pppd.h: No such file or directory" > > Hmm, you may want to re-check this against current versions of ppp and > portslave. I just re-checked this again and now portslave builds fine in testing, thanks. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

[Jeff Carr] > Did new packages stop getting processed because someone uploaded > that "hot-babe" package? You might find http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW-summary.html> slightly illuminating. From that list, I read that the NEW queue processing in general is progressing nicely, and that the

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Monday 25 April 2005 14.51, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >> libmysqlclient-lgpl - Linuxthreads test has to be switched off for > >> amd64 [...] > Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend > on libmysqlclient10-dev: > exim4 Does that mean amd64 inst

Re: mplayer 1.0pre7

A Mennucc wrote: hi mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge a. ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html FTP Assistants -- member Randall Donald (NEW processing) member Dan

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050425 18:20]: > Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 16:54 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit : > > > See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either: > > > > > > 1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably > > > OR > > > 2) Removing ARM

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 16:54 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit : > > See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either: > > > > 1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably > > OR > > 2) Removing ARM would not have a significant effect on the mirror load > > > > bu

Re: Status of PHP5?

On Monday 25 of April 2005 16:05, Martin Geisler wrote: > Also, what went wrong with the packages that were uploaded[1] in > February? > > [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=262977#msg37 About a half year ago I've asked the maintainer who filled ITP, what was the progress of de

Re: Status of PHP5?

Martin Geisler wrote: I've been asking Danish hosting providers about offering PHP5, and one of them (csg.dk) specifically said that they were waiting for PHP5 to appear in apt. Exactly the issue why I came here. My current hoster doesn't provide PHP5 because no package do exist. They would charge

Bug#306290: ITP: ttf-mph-2b-damase -- font with ranges from the latest version of unicode

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ttf-mph-2b-damase Version : 001.000 Upstream Author : Mark Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fixedsys.org/~node_ue/fonts/ * License : Public Domain Description

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

* Steve Greenland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050425 16:45]: > On 23-Apr-05, 17:24 (CDT), Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for > > sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much > > smaller - and AFAIK the si

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:24:28AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 23-Apr-05, 17:24 (CDT), Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for > > sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much > > smaller - and A

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

On 23-Apr-05, 17:24 (CDT), Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for > sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much > smaller - and AFAIK the size of the mirror pulses is the main problem. See, that just m

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend > on libmysqlclient10-dev: > > cyrus-sasl2 > cyrus-sasl2-mit Frozen. I will gladly update them if the release team tells me to go ahead and do it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One

mplayer 1.0pre7

hi mplayer 1.0pre7 is ready and packaged at http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mplayer/sarge a. ps: still no news from ftpmasters... hope they at least will try to read http://people.debian.org/~mjr/mplayer.html -- Andrea Mennucc "E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone) signatu

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On 25-Apr-05, 04:32 (CDT), Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package BTS Bug Problem description > --- --- > amynth #274703+ missing '#include ' in main.cc Or possibly '#include ', depending on

Re: Status of PHP5?

Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I wanted to inform myself on the current status of PHP5. I'm interested in seeing these packages in Debian too. Before finding the packages by Piotr Roszatycki I used packages from dotdeb.org, but I would feel more comfortable using package

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Andreas Jochens wrote: mn-fit #301509 segmentation fault on 64bit architectures FYI, this looks like it's due to some 64-bit brokenness in Cernlib (on which mn-fit depends). The same problem appears on alpha and ia64. I don't expect this to be solved for a long while, if ever; certa

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Andreas Jochens wrote: > Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture > --- > > At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting > team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64 which is based on the > unpatched Debian

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Hello Steve, thank you for your quick reply to my amd64 bug list. Steve Langasek wrote: >> libmysqlclient-lgpl - Linuxthreads test has to be switched off for amd64 > > I'm not going to give this a high priority, personally; all my reasons for > adding this package in the first place have since

Bug#306268: ITP: connect -- Establish socket connection using SOCKS4 or 5 and HTTP tunnel.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philippe COVAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: connect Version : 1.93 Upstream Author : Shun-ichi GOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.html * License : GPL 2 Description : E

Re: Debian Project Leader report for 2005-04-24

Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 01:03 -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader a écrit : > Woody Security Update Challenges and Progress > - > The ARM problems we've had have also affected the timeliness with which > we've been able to get security update

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Hi Andreas, On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Packages from sarge with build problems on amd64 > > There are still a few packages in sarge which fail to build from source > on amd64. Those packages will not be part

Status of PHP5?

Hello, I wanted to inform myself on the current status of PHP5. As it currently is, there is no PHP5 package in sid nor testing. I've found the bug report 262977 [1] and an email in march [2] where Piotr Roszatycki was asking about PHP thread safety and before that there was a small conversation

Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture --- At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64 which is based on the unpatched Debian sarge source packages. The amd64