On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Please correct me if I am wrong, but the script conversion will be necessary
> > for a proper upgrade path from sarge to etch anyway, and thus such stuff is
> > *non-optional*.
> It's arguable how much drivers blacklisting is critic
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:30:06PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >> Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and
> >> vips appear to be not transitioning to test
Wow, it works really well!! I used to dread doing an "update" because
of my slow dialup but now it's fast as could wish for (of course
downloading the packages is still slow, but at least I can now quickly
check to see if there are any interesting changes or not).
Thank you very much for this wor
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and
>> vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making
>> packages uninstallable on alpha (according to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and
> vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making
> packages uninstallable on alpha (according to
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:05:32PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 07:55 +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:43:43PM -0400, Faré wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear Debian developers,
> >>>
> >>>here is a
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:03:07AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
>
> > I like your idea. But i think that i think it should be better
> > to follow base-dir specification from freedesktop.org. It gives exactly
> > the same kind of dirname, but in
Though grep-excuses shows them to be valid candidates, both icu and
vips appear to be not transitioning to testing because of making
packages uninstallable on alpha (according to
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=icu and corresponding
for vips), but I don't see any evidence that they
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 19, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unlike Marco, I do see a lot of value in reorganising at least _some_ of
the 'configuration' files of users: seperating out .mozilla web caches
and .evolution IMAP caches greatly relieves the size of backups of ~/
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 07:55 +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:43:43PM -0400, Faré wrote:
Dear Debian developers,
here is a proposal I submit for inclusion in the debian policy:
PROPOSAL 1: ~/.cache/${package_name}/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnudoku
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Phillip Jordan, Colin Lewis and John Spray
* URL : http://icculus.org/~jcspray/GNUDoku/
* License : GPL
Description : A program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Neumaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-decor-suse2
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Gerd Fleischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gerdfleischer.de/kwin-decor-suse2/
* License : GPL
Description
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:37:41PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:34:26AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Last week fjp (Frans Pop) identified a regression[1] on last Parted
> >> relese regarting Sparc architecture.
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (reply-to: debian-boot)
Too bad, typo in manual reply-to...:-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 19, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *urgs*, I really hope that this does not mean to get rid of the hotplug
> package!
No, but I expect that more and more packages in the future will require
udev.
> There are people who like a static /dev and still want hotplug to
> properly
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> udev (0.070-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * hotplug and coldplug support has been merged in the udev package,
> which
> will load all the drivers needed as the beginning of the boot process
> and handle hotplug events later.
> The hotplug package has been disa
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 18:27 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 19, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Unlike Marco, I do see a lot of value in reorganising at least _some_ of
> > the 'configuration' files of users: seperating out .mozilla web caches
> > and .evolution IMAP caches
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 07:55 +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:43:43PM -0400, Faré wrote:
> > Dear Debian developers,
> >
> > here is a proposal I submit for inclusion in the debian policy:
> >
> > PROPOSAL 1: ~/.cache/${package_name}/
> > PROPOSAL 2: ~/.etc/${
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:34:26AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Last week fjp (Frans Pop) identified a regression[1] on last Parted
>> relese regarting Sparc architecture.
>
> Hrmm, there should probably a footnote somewhere that links to the
> b
On Sep 19, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unlike Marco, I do see a lot of value in reorganising at least _some_ of
> the 'configuration' files of users: seperating out .mozilla web caches
> and .evolution IMAP caches greatly relieves the size of backups of ~/
> directories. If al
On Sep 19, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easily done. Conflict with all packages providing blacklist entries by
> themselves, and convert everything else. This will keep things safe for
> sid/etch users at low cost (a few conflicts you have already tracked down
> anywa
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:34:26AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Last week fjp (Frans Pop) identified a regression[1] on last Parted
> relese regarting Sparc architecture.
Hrmm, there should probably a footnote somewhere that links to the
bug?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@ 18/09/2005 17:55 : wrote Josselin Mouette :
This is complete overkill. The only thing currently missing in your
scenario is support in apt-get and synaptic for grabbing dependencies
for a single binary package. E.g. "apt-get install foo.deb" or
"synaptic foo.deb".
There was some patch to
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > is it really that complicated? unless i'm missing something, wouldn't
> > it be as simple as
> For a start, only user-written files should be converted.
Easily done. Conflict with all packages providing blacklist entries by
themselves, and convert eve
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 15:17 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Faré [Sun, Sep 18 2005, 07:43:43PM]:
> > Dear Debian developers,
> >
> > here is a proposal I submit for inclusion in the debian policy:
> >
> > PROPOSAL 1: ~/.cache/${package_name}/
>
> There is no point in moving everything
#include
* Faré [Sun, Sep 18 2005, 07:43:43PM]:
> Dear Debian developers,
>
> here is a proposal I submit for inclusion in the debian policy:
>
> PROPOSAL 1: ~/.cache/${package_name}/
There is no point in moving everything to foo style names, it is
just not worth the work. I like the current me
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Wrong is endian little that knows everyone but.
>
> >Thgir yltcaxe!
>
> eurtub ,iw ta llobynt ydknih fo ehtlihcnerd?
ac si tIirc delldne elpp ssennaire a rof-: .nosa )
Thiemo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Wrong is endian little that knows everyone but.
Thgir yltcaxe!
eurtub ,iw ta llobynt ydknih fo ehtlihcnerd?
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Quoting Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Wrong is endian little that knows everyone but.
Thgir yltcaxe!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -EL/-EB/-el/-eb are commonly used gcc switches to select endianness.
OK, thanks. Another mystery solved :-)
Cheers, WB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Last week fjp (Frans Pop) identified a regression[1] on last Parted
relese regarting Sparc architecture.
His machine will be offline in comming days going to Oldenburg and
then I won't be able to hack on it. Would of good if someone can do a
look or provide access (as root) to some mach
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:59:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:16:42AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:26AM +0930, Debonaras Project Lead wrote:
> > > The Debonaras project (http://www.debonaras.org) is a group of Linux
> > > developers wh
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Just a completely uninformed question: Wasn't the -el (endian
> > little) in mipsel a pun on the "wrong" endianess? If so,
> > shouldn't it be armBE, because it's the "right" endianess?
>
> What gets you the impression there's a "wrong" endianes
W. Borgert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:26AM +0930, Debonaras Project Lead wrote:
> > The Debonaras project (http://www.debonaras.org) is a group of Linux
> > developers who have created the beginnings of a big-endian ARM (armeb)
> > port of Debian. We have built 2500+ stable packages so
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:16:42AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:26AM +0930, Debonaras Project Lead wrote:
> > The Debonaras project (http://www.debonaras.org) is a group of Linux
> > developers who have created the beginnings of a big-endian ARM (armeb)
> > port of Debia
On Sep 19, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it really that complicated? unless i'm missing something, wouldn't
> it be as simple as
For a start, only user-written files should be converted.
> (of course provided for proper handling of tmpfile generation and a
> debconf prompt, i guess
Hi!
Весь английский для Вас! Приходите и узучайте разговорный английский.
Большие скидки!!!
В Москве наши телефоны следующие:
один-ноль-пять 5186
238-33-86
Tsolakidis Moro
Akpinar Atanasova Wannithikul
Mauad Devine Holmgren Crespo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > What about user-installed blacklists? Will the new packages at least try to
> > convert these from blacklist format to modprobe format?
> No (but feel free to send code to do it).
is it really that complicated? unless i'm missing
On Monday 19 September 2005 00:35, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> (Side note: What's this obsession with Joe User everyone has? If there's
> something _you_ have a problem with when using Debian, shoot. Otherwise,
> synaptic is very easy to use -- even to Joe User).
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:22:30PM
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:26AM +0930, Debonaras Project Lead wrote:
> The Debonaras project (http://www.debonaras.org) is a group of Linux
> developers who have created the beginnings of a big-endian ARM (armeb)
> port of Debian. We have built 2500+ stable packages so far (see
> http://ftp.deb
Le lundi 19 septembre 2005 à 12:02 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> Once debian-unoffical.org supports Ubuntu, just get users to put
> debian-unofficial.org in their /etc/apt/sources.list. They claim that
> they will be importing Christian Marillat's mplayer/etc repository too
> soon.
Why import a bro
On Sep 19, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about user-installed blacklists? Will the new packages at least try to
> convert these from blacklist format to modprobe format?
No (but feel free to send code to do it).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sep 19, Faré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PROPOSAL 2: ~/.etc/${package_name}/
Renaming every configuration file is insane. Not even worth discussing.
> PROPOSAL 3: ~/.run/ ~/.lib/ ~/.share, etc.
As above, except that this even makes ~ more complex to manage.
> NB: I've send a similar proposal
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> I like your idea. But i think that i think it should be better
> to follow base-dir specification from freedesktop.org. It gives exactly
> the same kind of dirname, but in a more standardized way.
>
> Take a look at:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki
44 matches
Mail list logo
