bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it from the orig.tar.gz file. So there is no question of doing that. If you remove the CVS

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:34 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. It is not. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. Unfortunately. When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. It's still useful for native packages, so it isn't completely bogus even if one agrees with the point about

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Laszlo Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it from the orig.tar.gz file. So there is no question of doing that. Where do you read that? May be true, but can't remember any place ATM. What do you think orig means in

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Laszlo Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:34 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it from the orig.tar.gz file. So there is no question of doing that. Where do you read that? May be true, but can't

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. It's still useful for native packages, so it isn't completely

ITP: comix -- GTK Comic Book Viewer

2005-10-01 Thread Emfox Zhou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emfox Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: comix Version : 2.9.3 Upstream Author : Pontus Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://comix.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : GTK

What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed debian-mips@lists.debian.org, and the listed maintainers of

Re: ITP: g-wrap -- Scripting interface generator for C

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To clarify the situation: I've included mininimal wrappers for GLib that work with both GLib 1.x and GLib 2.x in G-Wrap, mainly to support GnuCash. These wrappers are built against GLib 1.x, since

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Nathanael Nerode] I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed debian-mips@lists.debian.org, and the

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Thomas Bushnell: What do you think orig means in orig.tar.gz? At the moment, it's a sequence of four ASCII characters without any particular meaning. Many maintainers use repackaged sources because they want to include multiple tarballs in their source packages, even though there's no need

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. So, it's a bogus warning. It should be removed from lintian. It's not really a bogus warning; the point

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Nathanael Nerode] I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed

Re: a place for a package directory in root

2005-10-01 Thread Joerg Sommer
Hello Thomas, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://panopticon.csustan.edu/thood/readonly-root.html I won't summarize the whole discussion here. I will just say that I see good reasons for adopting /run as a standard location for the storage of state information that needs to be

Re: Please have a look guys

2005-10-01 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 17.36, you wrote: Please have a look at this guys. [word document attached] [silly disclaimer to finish it] Please, do not post word documents on this list. For several reasons: - we're reading email here. Why should I need to start an additional application

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Joey Hess ha escrit: mydms package now has been corrected and now depends on debconf | debconf-2.0. Joey Hess wrote: Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend on debconf by itself without an alternate

Re: curl status update

2005-10-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Steve Langasek told: [...] There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear that

Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-01 Thread Christian Perrier
The bugs #208514, #268656, #269573, #29317 all finally suggest moving add-shell and remove-shell out of the passwd package. These utilities are use to register shells in /etc/shells and they obviously do no belong to the passwd package. Having them in passwd enforces shells to depend on it just

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Christian Perrier
You may decide that removing the CVS files from the orig is worse than having them there,[1] but it doesn't excuse the fact that having them there is bad (or at least stupid.) It also helps a lot when *we*, as upstream for native packages, inadvertently include a CVS or .svn directory in an

Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Riccardo Setti
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: cinelerra-cvs Version : 2.0-cvs Upstream Author : * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : GPL Description : non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: cinelerra-cvs Version : 2.0-cvs Upstream Author : * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License :

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Riccardo Setti wrote: Cinelerra, the first Linux based real-time editing and special effects system is a revolutionary Open Source HD media editing system. It has a number of effects built into the system including numerous telecine effects, video special effects

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Mario Fux
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2005 15.31 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: Morning On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: cinelerra-cvs Version : 2.0-cvs Upstream Author

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Tristan Seligmann
* Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-01 15:31:54 +0200]: You know there has been an RFP on cinelerra itself for a very long time, almost 5 years. See bugs.debian.org/78209, 156614, 239570. Why do you want to have a CVS version from the package if there even isn't a normal version of

Re: curl status update

2005-10-01 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Steve Langasek told: [...] There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a recompile

Bug#331079: ITP: hscurses -- Haskell binding to the ncurses library

2005-10-01 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: hscurses Version : 0.ds-20050830 Upstream Author : Stefan Wehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.stefanheimann.net/haskell/ * License : GPL Description : Haskell

Re: Re: watch file for SourceForge packages

2005-10-01 Thread tuysomphay phay
i want to watch free flim please sen to me thanhs Yahoo! for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
Kurt Roeckx wrote: You know there has been an RFP on cinelerra itself for a very long time, almost 5 years. See bugs.debian.org/78209, 156614, 239570. Why do you want to have a CVS version from the package if there even isn't a normal version of it in the archive? cinelerra is forked. To

Re: ITP: g-wrap -- Scripting interface generator for C

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, G-Wrap 1.3 has no upstream anymore, and its functionality is replicated in G-Wrap 1.9 - you know, I didn't add the compatibility layer for the fun of it. I know. Does upstream actually say that? I've been talking with Derek Atkins (warlord)

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Laszlo Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it from the orig.tar.gz file. So there is no question of doing that. Where do you read that? May be true, but can't remember any

can someone reproduce Bug #325971 (slapd + gnutls)

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Hermann
Hi, I hope this is the right list to ask. If not, please give me a hint where to post this otherwise. We run Debian Sarge on our institutes ldap server and our clients and have problems with slapd + applications using libgnutls11. See the bug report #325971

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And lintian does pester about outdated config.sub/guess, etc. These warnings are useful from time to time. Those problems can be fixed without violating Debian rules too. :) It does make sense to warn against Debian developers who have

Re: ITP: g-wrap -- Scripting interface generator for C

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does upstream actually say that? I've been talking with Derek Atkins (warlord) on IRC, and from what I gathered, they are trying to use G-Wrap 1.9, and mostly suceeding modulo a few buglets, all of which should be fixed in the Debian packaging.

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Roger Leigh
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It does make sense to warn against Debian developers who have *added* a CVS directory not present in the upstream source, but that's a different matter. Or those who screw up and add it to a

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is; and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious. What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed. Please see Debian policy. -- see

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Junichi Uekawa wrote: Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that priorities are fixed by ftp-masters. There needs to be a decision somewhere: 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before and make --resolve-deps the default in debootstrap 2. try to fix priorities/section

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is; and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious. What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Don Armstrong wrote: It's not really a bogus warning; the point of it is so that you're aware so that you can remind upstream not to distribute CVS files in their tarballs. Isn't getting nasty CVS directories in the source tree that you work on while maintaining the package reminder enough

Re: curl status update

2005-10-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of Paul TBBle Hampson told: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Steve Langasek told: [...] There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Eric Dorland
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The lintian warning source-contains-CVS-dir is bogus. I agree that upstream should not put CVS in their tarballs. But sometimes they do. When they do, it is a violation of Debian standards to remove it from the orig.tar.gz file. So

ITP: dares -- rescue files from damaged CDs and DVDs

2005-10-01 Thread Michael Hanke
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: dares Version : 0.6.5 Upstream Author : Oliver Diedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : ftp://ftp.heise.de/pub/ct/ctsi/dares.tgz * License : GPL Description : rescue files

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: If you want to maintain a package using cvs-buildpackage, you *have* to remove those files from the orig.tar.gz. This is false. cvs-upgrade -F and cvs-inject -F solves your problem. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: AFAIK the plan is to not constantly bother the ftp masters with override changes, Which makes the whole packages buggy according to the policy. Bastian -- A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her.

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Don Armstrong wrote: It's not really a bogus warning; the point of it is so that you're aware so that you can remind upstream not to distribute CVS files in their tarballs. Isn't getting nasty CVS directories in the source tree that you work on while

Re: curl status update

2005-10-01 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday 01 October 2005 02:49 pm, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of Paul TBBle Hampson told: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Steve Langasek told: [...]

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not. Perhaps they could be? :-) That would be a big help. --

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not.

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 14:55:18 -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want to maintain a package using cvs-buildpackage, you *have* to remove those files from the orig.tar.gz. Does that hold for debian/ only setups as well? Greetings Marc -- -- !!

Important news

2005-10-01 Thread info
We (Deep blue media technology) is engaged in web hosting and website design as well as multimedia company, company is located LA. We pass through long time arrangement and diligently officially provide service in January, 2005. Printing as multimedia from graphic design as web hosting, all in

Re: Apt, custom packages, and package dependencies

2005-10-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael S. Peek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello developers, I'm a n00b. I've got my own little http debian package repository. It shows up with apt and dselect. In this repository I've got a custom package that I'm working on that depends on a bunch of ldap stuff, and contains

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not. Perhaps they could

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Junichi Uekawa wrote: Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that priorities are fixed by ftp-masters. There needs to be a decision somewhere: 1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before and make

Bug#142164: Packages files should be in UTF-8

2005-10-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:32:13PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: reassign 142164 general thanks Hi, Just because a topic has been discussed on the policy discussion list is not reason enough to assign the bug to policy. Note that bug

Re: Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christian Perrier] The goal is having a system which always has the two utilities...and of course avoid the removal of passwd (debianutils is Essential while passwd isn't). passwd effectively is Essential because bash depends on it. So I'm pretty sure you don't have to worry about it being

Re: Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:05:30PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: The plan we draw is the following: 1) shadow package maintainers upload passwd which Depends: debianutils (= 2.14.3) this version *still* includes the utilities The purpose of 1) is to avoid the removal of passwd

Re: Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 02 October 2005 00:09, Peter Samuelson wrote: Just coordinate two uploads to happen in the same dinstall cycle: shadow 1:4.0.12-6 where passwd Depends: debianutils (= 2.15) debianutils 2.15 Conflicts and Replaces: passwd ( 1:4.0.12-6) Hmm. That will cover i386 I guess. What

Re: Debian GNU/Darwin

2005-10-01 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Mac OSX's open source version, Darwin, Does it qualify under DFSG ? Not if its under the ASPL. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: a place for a package directory in root

2005-10-01 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Joerg Sommer wrote: But I've a question on it: How can I use it? How can I set up /run before init runs the init script that is responsible for it? I'd assume you'd make the mounting of /run be the first script init runs. So, it'd be /etc/rcS.d/S00mountrun (under SysV-style init, of course).

Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in unstable once the translators catch up with all the string changes. So, everyone go find bugs in it! A few of the major changes

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in unstable once the translators catch up with all the string changes.

gal0.x not being added to archive?

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Why is gal0.x not being added to the archive on alpha, i386, mips, and mipsel? According to the buildd logs, it compiled successfully on all those archs over ten days ago. It was uploaded for all the other archs. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Travis Crump
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in unstable once the translators catch up

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Saturday 01 October 2005 05:57 pm, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:   I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental.  This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in unstable once the translators catch up with all the string changes.

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Saturday 01 October 2005 07:07 pm, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:   I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental.  This is basically a release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded as 0.4 in

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 07:18:32PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Saturday 01 October 2005 07:07 pm, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:   I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental.  This is basically a release candidate for 0.4

Re: Accepted aptitude 0.3.4-1 (source all i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Just a couple of comments: Daniel Burrows wrote: - New command-line option --schedule-only that just records the requested actions in the state file without actually performing them. (Closes: #312249) Hmm, I have a feeling it should be possible to use this in tasksel to let

Re: Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Frans Pop] shadow 1:4.0.12-6 where passwd Depends: debianutils (= 2.15) debianutils 2.15 Conflicts and Replaces: passwd ( 1:4.0.12-6) Hmm. That will cover i386 I guess. What about other arches that are autobuilt? (Assuming of course that both maintainers upload for i386.) Good

Re: pbuilder status update

2005-10-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, That said, I think it's good to use --resolve-deps by default for testing/unstable, so that override changes aren't that urgent (they don't break daily builds etc every other day), and can be batched up a bit, and processed when the dependency graph is a bit stable. Which may very well be

Accepted mmake 2.3-2 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:33:22 -0700 Source: mmake Binary: mmake Architecture: source all Version: 2.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL

Accepted gnucash-docs 1.8.5-3 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:09:08 -0700 Source: gnucash-docs Binary: gnucash-docs Architecture: source all Version: 1.8.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell,

Accepted mmorph 2.3.4.2-6 (source powerpc)

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:04:56 -0700 Source: mmorph Binary: mmorph Architecture: source powerpc Version: 2.3.4.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Accepted gaim-xmms-remote 1.8-2 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Francesco Pedrini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:52:44 +0200 Source: gaim-xmms-remote Binary: gaim-xmms-remote Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francesco Pedrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco

Accepted libcapplet 1:1.5.11-9 (source powerpc)

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:11:35 -0700 Source: libcapplet Binary: libcapplet1 libcapplet1-dev Architecture: source powerpc Version: 1:1.5.11-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted pam 0.79-3 (source i386 all)

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:17:53 -0700 Source: pam Binary: libpam0g-dev libpam0g libpam-modules libpam-doc libpam-runtime libpam-cracklib Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.79-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sam

Accepted tabextensions 1.14.2005092501-1 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Mike Hommey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:50:49 +0200 Source: tabextensions Binary: mozilla-tabextensions Architecture: source all Version: 1.14.2005092501-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mike

Accepted ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-3 (source all i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:13:11 +0530 Source: ctypes Binary: python2.4-ctypes python-ctypes python2.3-ctypes Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.9.6+cvs20050925-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ganesan Rajagopal

Accepted guile-gnome-platform 2.7.99-4 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Rottmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:36:17 +0200 Source: guile-gnome-platform Binary: guile-gnome0-gconf guile-gnome0-canvas guile-gnome0-gnome-ui guile-gnome0-gnome guile-gnome0-vfs guile-gnome0-glib guile-gnome0-gtk guile-gnome0-dev Architecture:

Accepted seahorse 0.7.9-3 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:18:08 +0200 Source: seahorse Binary: seahorse Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia

Accepted argus 1:2.0.6.fixes.1-9 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Andrew Pollock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:57:04 +1000 Source: argus Binary: argus-server Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:2.0.6.fixes.1-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Pollock

Accepted jove 4.16.0.69-1 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Cord Beermann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:07:09 +0200 Source: jove Binary: jove xjove Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.16.0.69-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cord Beermann [EMAIL

Accepted ibam 1:0.3-7 (source m68k)

2005-10-01 Thread Martin Wuertele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:06:36 +0200 Source: ibam Binary: ibam gkrellm-ibam Architecture: source m68k Version: 1:0.3-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Wuertele [EMAIL

Accepted mydms 1.4.3-2 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:41:20 +0200 Source: mydms Binary: mydms Architecture: source all Version: 1.4.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Miguel Gea Milvaques [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Miguel Gea Milvaques [EMAIL

Accepted adduser 3.67.2 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Marc Haber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:11:07 + Source: adduser Binary: adduser Architecture: source all Version: 3.67.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Adduser Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL

Accepted xt-toolbuslib 0.5.1-4 (source mips)

2005-10-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:25:39 +0200 Source: xt-toolbuslib Binary: xt-toolbuslib Architecture: source mips Version: 0.5.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno

Accepted dokuwiki 0.0.20050922-4 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Matti Pöllä
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:42 +0300 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20050922-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matti Pöllä

Accepted smokeping 2.0.3-1 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 14:00:45 +0200 Source: smokeping Binary: smokeping Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia

Accepted mp3gain 1.4.6-2 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:04:01 +0200 Source: mp3gain Binary: mp3gain Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.4.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted f-prot-installer 0.5.18 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Johannes Rohr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:40:15 +0200 Source: f-prot-installer Binary: f-prot-installer Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Johannes Rohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Johannes Rohr

Accepted mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.7-1 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Alexander Sack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:00:00 +0100 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Binary: mozilla-thunderbird-dev mozilla-thunderbird-inspector mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind mozilla-thunderbird-offline Architecture: source i386

Accepted netspeed 0.13-1 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:35:51 +0200 Source: netspeed Binary: netspeed Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.13-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL

Accepted libsub-override-perl 0.08-1 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Kenneth J. Pronovici
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:32:25 -0500 Source: libsub-override-perl Binary: libsub-override-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.08-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted preview-latex 0.9.1-3 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread OHURA Makoto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 00:02:47 +0900 Source: preview-latex Binary: preview-latex preview-latex-style Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted eciadsl 0.11-2 (source i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Marco d'Itri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:05:35 +0200 Source: eciadsl Binary: eciadsl Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.11-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted pychecker 0.8.16-1 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Kenneth J. Pronovici
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:27:38 -0500 Source: pychecker Binary: pychecker Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.16-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kenneth J. Pronovici

Accepted libcrypto++ 5.2.1c2-8 (source all i386)

2005-10-01 Thread Jens Peter Secher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:11:18 +0200 Source: libcrypto++ Binary: libcrypto++-utils libcrypto++-doc libcrypto++-dev libcrypto++5.2c2 Architecture: source all i386 Version: 5.2.1c2-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jens

Accepted ifscheme 1.5-1 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Guus Sliepen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:58:10 +0200 Source: ifscheme Binary: ifscheme Architecture: source all Version: 1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted clamav-data 20050930.171700.1106 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Marc Haber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 03:34:05 + Source: clamav-data Binary: clamav-data Architecture: source all Version: 20050930.171700.1106 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL

Accepted oaf 0.6.10-4 (source powerpc)

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:53:42 -0700 Source: oaf Binary: liboaf-dev liboaf0 oaf Architecture: source powerpc Version: 0.6.10-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas

Accepted xmltv 0.5.40-2 (source all)

2005-10-01 Thread Kenneth J. Pronovici
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:44:04 -0500 Source: xmltv Binary: xmltv-util libxmltv-perl xmltv-gui xmltv Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.40-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >