In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/yelp_2.10.0-3_i386.deb - open (30
> Read-only file system) [IP: 204.152.191.7 80]
> debian:~# screen
> mkfifo /var/run/screen/S-root/5922.pts-0.debian failed
your /var is mounted read only mode because your kernel had an
Hi Alejandro.
Looks like your ext3 partition has errors and the system remount it in
readonly mode.
Not every problem get corrected by apt, I mean apt rocks but this is not
a package problem.
Try to check your partition with fsck (man fsck, man fsck.ext3) maybe
you need will to execute a livec
Hi,
Every some hours my Debian Sid box goes wild and I can't do anything.
Not even being root.
Is crazy. I can't even do apt-get update to try fixing this problem...
Err http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main xpdf-common 3.01-2
Could not open file
/var/cache/apt/archives/partial/xpdf-commo
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Can't the patch be posted to the BTS and NMUed after two days if
>>> there's no response (in general)?
>>
>> Yeah, but golly, sometimes there is no patch because the patch is
>> blindingly obvious.
>
> No, no, no. Please not. There's always a patch, a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Fernando J. Rodríguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: metaplanet
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Oscar Cubo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Ramóons Vivanco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://laurel.datsi.fi.upm.es/metaplanet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: acpidump
Version : 20050926
Upstream Author : Alexey Starikovskiy
* URL :
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
* License : GPLv2
Description
On October 18, 2005 03:30, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> OK, as it turns out I was half wrong: /proc/bus/ is not syncronous, so
> scripts still need to wait (they may use the wait_for_file function from
> /lib/hotplug/hotplug.functions). OTOH, RUN is still the correct keyword
> to use, because PROGRAM has
> And for those of you interested in the architecture distribution, here
> are the numbers and percentages:
I think popcon is a really neat project. I do look every now and then
to see when the "unknown" line crosses the "amd64" line :) It's
getting close.
Keep up the good work,
sean finney wrote:
> in the long run, i think it would be preferable to have this package
> have support for gnutls as an alternative to openssl. however, i don't
> even know where to start on this. does anyone here have some notes
> or links handy where i could start for porting the few ssl-usi
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Yes, I thought about sending this to -curiosa instead... :-)
>
> For research/fun/..., I want to install historical versions of Debian. Does
> anybody have install media of rex and buzz? I guess it is possible to
> create packages by starting at
Yo!
(Yes, I thought about sending this to -curiosa instead... :-)
For research/fun/..., I want to install historical versions of Debian. Does
anybody have install media of rex and buzz? I guess it is possible to
create packages by starting at bo and compiling the older binaries, but I
don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libcatalyst-engine-apache-perl
Version : 0.99
Upstream Authors : Sebastian Riedel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christian Hansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Also how would a package inset such a Post-Invoke line into the
>>> conffig? Modifying the conffile would be a policy violation.
>>
>> The package
Re: Alejandro Bonilla in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was upgrading Sid and I saw this error message. I dunno if one goes to BTS
> or just here to report this. I hope it can be seen by someone who takes care
> of this package.
>
> Setting up gstreamer0.8-oss (0.8.11-1.1) ...
To the BTS.
Christoph
--
Hi,
I was upgrading Sid and I saw this error message. I dunno if one goes to BTS
or just here to report this. I hope it can be seen by someone who takes care
of this package.
Setting up gstreamer0.8-oss (0.8.11-1.1) ...
OIL: ERROR liboiltest.c 309: oil_test_check_impl(): function
fbCompositeSolid
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Also how would a package inset such a Post-Invoke line into the
>> conffig? Modifying the conffile would be a policy violation.
>
> The package that provides the hook to run provides the config entry; t
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:56:15AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [1] please don't file an rc bug against my package for my having mentioned
>>this... i've recently adopted it and would like to see the 30 some odd
>>bugfixes make it
Re: Roberto C. Sanchez in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for the pointer. I was a bit confused since my QA page shows my
> key ID on it.
DDPO (aka developer.php) doesn't do that anymore. The code had been
broken for some time, and was disabled several weeks ago. The gpg
keyid was only informational
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:17:54PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Roberto C. Sanchez in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I recently generated a new gpg key. I was planning on revoking my old
> > key, however all of my packages were uploaded with signatures from my
> > old key. Do I need to prepare new
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We should really document the result of this discussion in the
developers' reference, which currently says:
,
| NMUs which fix important, serious or higher severity bugs are
| encouraged and accepted.
`
This I always interpreted as "
Hi...
A coworker just showed me his Ubuntu/Breezy installation featuring their
package management tool "adept" [1]. It looks pretty nifty. Are there plans
already to offer the same package in Debian? It's not listed in the wnpp
yet. I'm just curious if anyone has talked to Ubuntu maintainers about
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Shouldn't NMU's without the maintainers approval be restricted to RC and
> maybe important bugs?
No, unless you add some sort of timeframe. MIA or otherwise absent
maintainers are the usual reason why one needs NMUs.
--
"One disk to rule them all, On
Em Ter, 2005-10-18 às 01:03 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> I think a good balance would be something like:
What if all NMUs are delayed for N days, but if maintainer agrees the
NMU skips the delay...
daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:12:49PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Didn't there used to
Re: animesh bhowmick in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I found a download for MIPS. Then I saw it is having a
> .deb extension. How does one uncompress this?
1) Don't cross-post.
2) Install Debian. Read the installation notes.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Descript
Re: Roberto C. Sanchez in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I recently generated a new gpg key. I was planning on revoking my old
> key, however all of my packages were uploaded with signatures from my
> old key. Do I need to prepare new uploads with the new key? Since I am
> not too far into the NM process
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Didn't there used to be a delayed queue for NMUs to go into so that the
> > > maintainer has time to nix it i
Hi Joey
Joey Hess wrote:
> In the process of my work on the testing security team, I've noticed
> that many developers still seem to be unfamiliar with how to use the new
> version tracking features[1] of the Debian BTS.
< ... >
> I thought I'd conclude with an example of how to do it right, and
On 10/17/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (...)
>
> > but is there anyone in the project with academic background about
> > this subject ?
>
> None of the current popcon maintainers have statistical background, as
> far as I know.
>
> We were in touch with someone interested in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: flamerobin
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : flamerobin (IDPL):
Barbara Del Vecchio
Gregory Sapunkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Hie
On 10/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] please don't file an rc bug against my package for my having mentioned
>this... i've recently adopted it and would like to see the 30 some odd
>bugfixes make it into testing.
Isn't it possible to tell the BTS the RC bug also applies
hey -devel,
the zombie of gpl vs. openssl has once again arisen from the grave,
this time, in one of the packages that i maintain (nagios-plugins).
as i'm on the upstream development team as well, i've already clarified
with the other developers there that this is an omission, and that
we'll eithe
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Olaf van der Spek]
>> If there's no approval, shouldn't 'that' be fixed also?
>
> Depends on the form of the lack of approval. If there is no reply,
> the MIA process should be started, and if there is a NACK, the NMU
> should not go throught with
Hi all,
The locale si_LK was recently added to glibc (after a long stay in the
Bugzilla). Please consider including it in the Debain glibc as it
will take some time before it will appear in mainstream glibc. Thanks
in advance.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=367
Anuradha
[Olaf van der Spek]
> If there's no approval, shouldn't 'that' be fixed also?
Depends on the form of the lack of approval. If there is no reply,
the MIA process should be started, and if there is a NACK, the NMU
should not go throught without further discussion. But one should not
have to waint
On 10/18/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Frank Küster]
> > Shouldn't NMU's without the maintainers approval be restricted to RC
> > and maybe important bugs?
>
> Well, assuming we want as many bugs as possible fixed before the
> release, and not only RC bugs, I believe NMUs sh
[Frank Küster]
> Shouldn't NMU's without the maintainers approval be restricted to RC
> and maybe important bugs?
Well, assuming we want as many bugs as possible fixed before the
release, and not only RC bugs, I believe NMUs should be possible for
all kinds of bugs.
With maintainer approval if po
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a good balance would be something like:
>
> - send mail to the bug with a full diff *before* uploading your package to
> incoming; two minutes before, two hours before, two days before, it
> doesn't matter
And make sure that the mail has act
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:33:04AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >It's easy to understand why people are opposed to too-frequent NMUs. They
> >don't want to be seen as bad maintainers for having too many NMUs on their
> >packages; they worry about new bugs being introduce
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Didn't there used to be a delayed queue for NMUs to go into so that the
> > maintainer has time to nix it if neccessary? ^_^
>
> Sure, but at the moment, I only know one way to
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> > That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
>>> > and
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Didn't there used to be a delayed queue for NMUs to go into so that the
>> maintainer has time to nix it if neccessary? ^_^
>
> Sure, but at the moment, I only know one way to use dupload since the
reassign 334068 libsane
thanks
On Oct 17, Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On October 17, 2005 13:03, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > The problem seems to be that udev runs lmctl before the usbfs entry
> > > corresponding to your mouse has been created under /proc/bus/usb. The
> >
> > By
Hi ,
I found LmBench in the Debian web site.
Is it free for usage?
I would like to run LmBench on the MIPS platform. Is
there any particular way of configuring it? We do not
have any native compiler or tools running on the
target MIPS platform.
In the following link,
http://packages.debian.org/
44 matches
Mail list logo
