El domingo, 18 de junio de 2006 a las 22:03:32 -0500, Ron Johnson escribía:
> When I tried to install it as root (using "su -" from an xterm
> window), it complained about not being able to find DISPLAY. Unlike
> Sun Java & Macromedia Flash, it uses a GUI installer.
I've found "sux" works beaut
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking
> for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is
> that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64
> kernel (at le
> Concur. Even if the installer isn't accepted into contrib, but were
> in a separate mirror like Marrilat, I'd add it.
If the installer works well (ie does the advertised job), I see no
reason for it not going in the archive.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 23:56 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
>> Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
>>
>>> But the most important one of all is: I've found it useful, I've got it
>>> working[1], and I'd like to give others an opportunity to use it if they
>>> want to.
>>>
>>> [1] (almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
Joe Smith wrote:
> "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
>
[snip]
>> When I tried to install it as root (using "su -" from an xterm
>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> >> Joe Smith wrote:
> >>> "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: googleearth-package
>
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 23:56 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> > But the most important one of all is: I've found it useful, I've got it
> > working[1], and I'd like to give others an opportunity to use it if they
> > want to.
> >
> > [1] (almost working--I'm still tweaking it a
Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> But the most important one of all is: I've found it useful, I've got it
> working[1], and I'd like to give others an opportunity to use it if they
> want to.
>
> [1] (almost working--I'm still tweaking it a bit, since I've only been
> working on it for a few hours)
Doe
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 23:10:36 +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: normal
> [Side note: Buildds/dpkg-buildpackage has no robust way of telling if
> the optional build-arch field exists and must call build. This is
> wastefull for both build dependencies and build ti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miles Bader wrote:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure
>> that the package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere
>> with the system. Normally the main reason why a debian p
Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I'm confused. In the netatalk README.Debian it says that the
> Debian project has decided that OpenSSL is GPL-incompatible and
> therefore he can't distribute the ssl-based portions of netatalk (like
> encrypted authentication with classic macs).
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
> package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
> system. Normally the main reason why a debian package is better than
> what upsteam distributed is because using upstr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Joe Smith wrote:
>> "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> Package: wnpp
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>> Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> * Package name: googleearth-package
>>>
Joe Smith wrote:
> Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
> package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
> system. Normally the main reason why a debian package is better than
> what upsteam distributed is because using upstreams packages will mess
Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * Package name: googleearth-package
>> Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello all,
I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking
for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is
that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64
kernel (at least -- I haven't checked other architectures) was built wi
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: googleearth-package
Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : (native packag
PING missing_maintainers (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.136 ms64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.116 ms64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=3 ttl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ otavio CCed ]
On 06/18/2006 09:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>
> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
> Peter Veenstra (dosbox)
>
> I have not noticed many updates to these progr
Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Peter Veenstra (dosbox)
I have not noticed many updates to these programs recently, and both seem to
have some ignored bugs in the bts such as
#336433
#312969
#301925
#362928
I have sent both m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: googleearth-package
Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : (native package)
* License : GPL
Description : utility for automatically building a
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
> because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
> multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
> version pulled by libsoup,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:24:35PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> (amd64 is only faster in 64-bit mode because of all the poorly
> designed x86 32-bit instruction set.)
"x86 32-bit instruction set" and "designed" in one sentence? Hah.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes",
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>there appears to currently be a sparc release of debian,
>http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/
(not currently a release candidate for etch)
>and it appears to claim to support some kind of limited 64bit support.
>There are some unstated th
Hi,
I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
version pulled by libsoup, and the version pulled by -lgnutls when the
binary
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>>> Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
>>> investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
>>> value with a %u or %d format str
On 6/18/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The OpenSSL license is incompatible with the GPL. A GPL application
needs an addition to its license that allows linking with OpenSSL. Some
application authors do that and then Debian (or anyone) can distribute
the apps (in a binary form); som
On 6/18/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Josselin Mouette
| Le dimanche 18 juin 2006 à 15:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| > | Tollef, you realise that neither me nor Marc (who has started this thread)
| > | have ever talked about NMUs?
| >
| > Josselin Mouette did. I've ea
* Josselin Mouette
| Le dimanche 18 juin 2006 à 15:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| > | Tollef, you realise that neither me nor Marc (who has started this
thread)
| > | have ever talked about NMUs?
| >
| > Josselin Mouette did. I've earlier this week had to stop an NMU of
| > apr-util an
Le dimanche 18 juin 2006 à 15:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> | Tollef, you realise that neither me nor Marc (who has started this thread)
> | have ever talked about NMUs?
>
> Josselin Mouette did. I've earlier this week had to stop an NMU of
> apr-util and would prefer that people don't N
* Adrian von Bidder
| On Sunday 18 June 2006 07:51, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| [...]
| > > Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be
| > > welcome.
| >
| > Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
| > similar aren't.
|
| Tollef, you realise tha
* Josselin Mouette
| Le dimanche 18 juin 2006 à 07:51 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| > > Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be
welcome.
| >
| > Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
| > similar aren't.
|
| Why do you see NMUs as
Scripsit Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
>> investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
>> value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if size_t is 64
>> bits (unles
On Sunday 18 June 2006 07:51, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
[...]
> > Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be
> > welcome.
>
> Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
> similar aren't.
Tollef, you realise that neither me nor Marc (who has started t
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 07:51 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
> similar aren't.
NMU's are not personal attacks but they are people helping you to
improve the quality of packages in Debian. I hope you don't feel
threatened by peopl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Coval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tuxguitar
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Julian Casadesus
* URL : http://www.herac.com.ar/soluciones/tuxguitar.htm
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descripti
This one time, at band camp, Kari Pahula said:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:46:11PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
> > * License : GPLv2 or later
>
> > Currently has support for MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite.
>
> And PostgreSQL links to openssl, which is GPL incompatible. Sigh...
> I'll inves
On 6/18/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be welcome.
Useful patches and comments are always welcome.
But sending them to /dev/null appears to have the same effect.
Threats of NMUs and
similar aren't.
How about
***Fuenf Sterne Strand Hotel an Tuerkischen Riveria HP eine Woche KOSTENLOS .***
Als S Group 2006 feiern wir das 10jährige Jubiläum unserer Gründung.
Aus diesem Anlass bieten wir in den 5 Sterne Strandhotels in Belek Antalya
Aufenthalt-Halbpension kostenlos.
Im Einzelnen: Reisetermine sind zwische
Le dimanche 18 juin 2006 à 07:51 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> > Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be welcome.
>
> Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
> similar aren't.
Why do you see NMUs as threats? This only means people are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: svnclientadapter
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Chabanois Cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Bradby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Phippard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://subclip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: javasvn
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Unknown
* URL : http://tmate.org/svn/
* License : Custom
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a pure Java Subversion client
> >Without knowing or having asked Adam, this seems like help might be
> >welcome.
>
> Useful patches and comments are always welcome. Threats of NMUs and
> similar aren't.
But what about the apparent unresponsiveness of the mailing list,
which seems to have been raised in this thread?
From
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ganymed-ssh2
Version : 0.209
Upstream Author : Christian Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ganymed.ethz.ch/ssh2/
* License : Custom
Programming Lang: Java
D
You've qualified for one of our mortgage rates given below!
Bad cred? these rates are guaranteed.
Our last few customers today:
-Marvin. FLos Angeles, CA279,000 @ 4.11%
-Will. WTampa, FL519,000 @ 3.74%
-Janice. JAtlanta, GA789,000 @ 3.24%
-Sammy. APatterson, NJ919
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:40:13AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Philip Brown skrev:
> >So to deliberately ignore an issue, becuase
> >"we dont support big-endian 64bit *right now*", would seem to be rather
> >short sighted to me.
> ia64 has been supported for quite a while and is a pure 64 bit
46 matches
Mail list logo
