"David H. Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Win-XP has a builtin cmd-line cmd called 'start'. For example, by
> passing a .ZIP file to 'start', the file-associations meta-data is
> consulted and the preferred application (i.e. the 'OPENs-with' defn) is
> launched, being passed the target file to
* David H. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-22 07:47]:
>
> Win-XP has a builtin cmd-line cmd called 'start'. For example, by
> passing a .ZIP file to 'start', the file-associations meta-data is
> consulted and the preferred application (i.e. the 'OPENs-with' defn) is
> launched, being passed th
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> But current apt-cacher still miss some nice features of apt-proxy like
>>> the possibility to enforce a server to be use for Debian or anything
>>> else.
>>
>> Parse error. What do you want to enforce? You
On 6/22/06, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-06-22, David H. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, my question is: Is there an equivalent cmd for 'start' (e.g. for
> KDE)?
kfmclient exec foobar.odt
What if I am using gnome? Should I use gnome-open then?
Ah, and how do I determin
On 2006-06-22, David H. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, my question is: Is there an equivalent cmd for 'start' (e.g. for
> KDE)?
kfmclient exec foobar.odt
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Win-XP has a builtin cmd-line cmd called 'start'. For example, by
passing a .ZIP file to 'start', the file-associations meta-data is
consulted and the preferred application (i.e. the 'OPENs-with' defn) is
launched, being passed the target file to open.
So, my question is: Is there an equivalent
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But current apt-cacher still miss some nice features of apt-proxy like
>> the possibility to enforce a server to be use for Debian or anything
>> else.
>
> Parse error. What do you want to enforce? You can setup path mapping
> (from /debian to a list of
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:50 +0200, Daniel Michalik wrote:
> Is there any possibility to compile and install the packet exactely
> the same way like the original debian packet is but including debug
> symbols and run the xserver manually in a debugger?
mkdir foo ; cd foo
apt-get install fakeroot
a
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> It is not allowed to ship a binary which includes both GPL'd code and
> GPL-incompatible code, whether you do so by dynamic or static linking,
> and whether the GPL'd code directly or only indirectly depends upon
> the GPL-incompatible code.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jxta-c
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : The JXTA-C Project
* URL : http://jxta-c.jxta.org
* License : Jxta software license (based on apache license 1.1)
Description
Hi Florian,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mario Holbe:
>
> > We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
> > no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
> > automatically override even
#include
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, Jun 20 2006, 09:45:24AM]:
> Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
> >> skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in wha
Hello,
this is my first attempt to fix a bug in a big programm like the x system is.
Currently I'm feeling a little bit overextended by the size of the source code
and the dependencies of different packets. I hope you can give me some hints,
where to begin my search.
'xrandr -s 1' kills my xserve
#include
* Chris Halls [Tue, Jun 20 2006, 01:04:04PM]:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
> > skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not
> > how they do it.
>
> Well, when
* Hamish Moffatt [Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:33:21 +1000]:
> Actually it seems closer to approx than to apt-cacher. I switched over
> as apt-proxy became unusable and have few complaints. Like apt-proxy,
> the sources are set on the server rather than specified by the clients,
> and it has its own web se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-style-dekorator
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : moty rahamim
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=31447
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: QT
D
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > So before diving into into regular expressions any further (
* Mario Holbe:
> We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
> no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
> automatically override even the unstable version. Of course, if you
> don't source in s.d.o, you don't get security updates :)
In this c
Dear friends!
As I am no DD till now (still awaiting FD approval) I send my vac
message here:
Packages I am responsible for:
texinfo, info
cm-super(-x11)
texlive-*
I am leaving for more or less 5 weeks without any regular internet
connection, and not the time to care for
It is common for daemons to be stopped in pre{inst,rm}. This makes
sense, but I wonder what the motivation is.
I see two possible explanations:
1. Both postinst and prerm can often abstain from checking their
arguments. prerm is called with any of:
"remove [in-favour]"
"[failed-]upgrade"
El mié, 21-06-2006 a las 00:55 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester
escribió:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:01, Luciano Bello wrote:
> > hi dudes!
>
> Hi,
>
> > Some packages need libssh2.
>
> The ITP I filed was against libssh[1] made by Aris Adamentiadis, not the
> libssh2 you mention.
>
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG
>
> | What matters is not what the Debian package dependencies look like,
> | but the shared library dependencies in the programs themselves.
>
> libfoo will obviously have a NEEDED which lists libbar (and both
> libbar-ssl and l
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
>> > practical experience with lookahead patterns for example)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
> > > practical experience with lookahea
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>for mentors.debian.net I would like to find a perfect (TM) regular
>expression to split the "Version:" line of a control file into:
>
> - epoch
> - upstream version
> - Debian package revision
>
>My current attempt is:
>
> ^(?:(\d+)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
> > practical experience with lookahead patterns for example) I would like
> > to know if anyone else has worked
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
> practical experience with lookahead patterns for example) I would like
> to know if anyone else has worked on this. Perhaps even some Debian tool
> does this parsing. I need an impl
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> for mentors.debian.net I would like to find a perfect (TM) regular
> expression to split the "Version:" line of a control file into:
>
> - epoch
> - upstream version
> - Debian package revision
>
> My current attempt is:
>
>
On Mit, 21 Jun 2006, Christoph Haas wrote:
>^(?:(\d+):)?(\d[\w\.\+-:]*?)(?:-(.+))?$
What about ending with
(?:-([^-]+))?$
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining Università di Siena
gpg DSA
Hi...
for mentors.debian.net I would like to find a perfect (TM) regular
expression to split the "Version:" line of a control file into:
- epoch
- upstream version
- Debian package revision
My current attempt is:
^(?:(\d+):)?(\d[\w\.\+-:]*?)(?:-(.+))?$
I have extracted the version of my
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ortp
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Simon MORLAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linphone.org/ortp/sources/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:07:28AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, there is no good reason to have s.d.o in
> > my sources list, as the packages in there are for sarge, and may not be
> > compatible with the current sid ABI.
>
>
שלום אנשים יקרים -
אני
רוצה להזמין את כולם לפסטיבל אומנויות ראשון מסוגו – 'במוזה',
פרוייקט ייחודי
המוציא את אומנויות הבמה מאולמות
המופעים אל הטבע.
הפסטיבל יתקיים בשישישבת
הקרוב
23-24
ליוני בקיבוץ חורשים
(חמש דקות מכפר
סבא)
שילוב ייחודי
ומרתק של מוסיקה, מחול,תיאטרון ואומנויו
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: aspell-pt-pt
Version : 20060602
Upstream Author : Jose Joao de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linguateca.di.uminho.pt/dics/dics.html
* License : GPL
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wbrazilian
Version : 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-10
Upstream Author : Ricardo Ueda Karpischek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ime.usp.br/~ueda/br.ispell/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wportuguese
Version : 20060602
Upstream Author : Jose Joao de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linguateca.di.uminho.pt/dics/dics.html
* License : GPL
Desc
* Hendrik Sattler
| Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 00:56 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
| > Is this allowed? If not, why not? Would it be allowed if the package
| > stanza for libfoo read:
| >
| > Package: libfoo
| > Depends: libbar-ssl | libbar, libc6
|
| Is this actually supported by the linker?
Imag
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> After installing updates to unstable tonight X is no longer able to
> start. Errors from .xsession-errors is
> Failed to start message bus: Failed to read directory
> "/etc/dbus-1/${prefix}/share/dbus-1/ser
* Thomas Bushnell BSG
| What matters is not what the Debian package dependencies look like,
| but the shared library dependencies in the programs themselves.
libfoo will obviously have a NEEDED which lists libbar (and both
libbar-ssl and libbar have a soname of libbar and have to conflict).
--
Hi list,
After installing updates to unstable tonight X is no longer able to
start. Errors from .xsession-errors is
Failed to start message bus: Failed to read directory
"/etc/dbus-1/${prefix}/share/dbus-1/services": No such file or directory
EOF in dbus-launch reading address from bus dae
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:21:17AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 00:56 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> > Is this allowed? If not, why not? Would it be allowed if the package
> > stanza for libfoo read:
> >
> > Package: libfoo
> > Depends: libbar-ssl | libbar, libc6
>
> Is
41 matches
Mail list logo
