On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:36:02AM +0200, Marco Presi wrote:
ez macchina disponibile, mi fermo volentieri entrambi i giorni[1].
ez Chi si aggrega?
Io! :)
ez Chi eventualmente può aggiungere altre auto se si riempie la prima?
Preferirei arrivare a Bologna in
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 02:04 +0200, Julien Louis a écrit :
Ces ops étaient là *avant* que irc.debian.org ne migre sur OFTC. Pourquoi ce
ne
sont pas les DD qui s'en occupent ? tout simplement parce que les DD ne sont
que très rarement venu sur ce chan avant aujourd'hui. Où étaient tous
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 02:04 +0200, Julien Louis a écrit :
Ces ops étaient là *avant* que irc.debian.org ne migre sur OFTC. Pourquoi ce ne
sont pas les DD qui s'en occupent ? tout simplement parce que les DD ne sont
que très rarement venu sur ce chan avant
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Je crois que tu oublies le petit incident d'il y a quelques jours,
intervenu avec un parfait newbie qui n'avait que le malheur de ne pas
exprimer correctement ses interrogations, par manque de vocabulaire et
de compréhension.
Non
Julien Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il s'est fait littéralement agresser, humilier puis bannir sans que
personne ne cherche à clarifier son problème.
Et il nous a agressé aussi. Et nous avons essayé de voir quel était son
En posant des questions. Sur un channel de support. Bien, bien.
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 12:49, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Julien Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il s'est fait littéralement agresser, humilier puis bannir sans que
personne ne cherche à clarifier son problème.
Et il nous a agressé aussi. Et nous avons essayé de voir quel était son
En
Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Et il nous a agressé aussi. Et nous avons essayé de voir quel était son
En posant des questions. Sur un channel de support. Bien, bien.
Non, il nous a notamment traités de gros nuls, il n'a pas lu les
On ne peut pas lui donner tort, étant donné
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Je continue à penser que vous avez mal réagi et que vous vous êtes
amusés de la situation plus qu'autre chose.
Oui, et c'est vraiment très très vilain.
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 22:19, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Suite à des rumeurs pas très plaisantes, je suis passé voir quelques
minutes ce qui se passe sur #debian-fr, et force est de constater que ça
ne vaut guère mieux que le chan anglophone, et il ne m'a pas fallu
longtemps pour constater
Le mar 12 septembre 2006 14:44, Florent Bayle a écrit :
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 22:19, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Suite à des rumeurs pas très plaisantes, je suis passé voir
quelques minutes ce qui se passe sur #debian-fr, et force est de
constater que ça ne vaut guère mieux que le chan
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:56:31PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Et le fait qu'aucun DD ne soit sur le chan, est plutôt un manque il me
semble. Et encore une fois, désolé pour les fondateurs du chan, mais
OFTC *est* irc.debian.org.
Est ce une raison pour arriver avec ses gros souliers et
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote :
Et il nous a agressé aussi. Et nous avons essayé de voir quel était son
En posant des questions. Sur un channel de support. Bien, bien.
Soit tu es de mauvaise foi soit tu n'étais pas présent.
Alors quelques morceaux choisis
Le mar 12 septembre 2006 14:56, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
Et encore une fois, désolé pour les fondateurs du chan, mais
OFTC *est* irc.debian.org.
pardon, je voulais bien sur dire: irc.debian.org pointe sur OFTC.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL
Stéphane Salès wrote:
Alors quelques morceaux choisis (j'ai changé son nick) :
(il veut faire qqch de non trivial, on lui dit que ce qu'il veut faire
est loin d'etre trivial, et il nous balance pfff vous savez même pas
faire) :
10:58 dd mon beau pere dit toujours, quan on sait pas on ferme
sa
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Il s'est fait littéralement agresser, humilier puis bannir sans que
personne ne cherche à clarifier son problème.
C'est inadmissible. Je pense qu'il faudrait un Code of Conduct pour
les canaux IRC portant le nom debian.
Peut-être nous
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen much support for my position yet - most
responses are in the line of if you don't want to be flamed, don't set
the mailinglist to moderated. I remain at flaming your fellows never
helps the project, making requests and
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 02:11, Charles Plessy wrote:
It is really unfortunate that the regulation of moderation is hidden
under a privacy menu in Mailman. Maybe the most straightforward mean
to slove this in the future would be to make the new
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bzr-plugin-webserve
Version : web interface for bazaar-ng
Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
hey d-d,
in sarge, the nagios-plugins is a single monolithic package with a
number of plugins and config files (mostly with a 1:1 mapping).
in sid/etch, the nagios-plugins package is split into two packages,
nagios-plugins-basic, nagios-plugins-standard, each of which contains a
subset of the
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:02 -0600, Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 11:08, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:02 -0600, Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56.
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
I tend to doubt these numbers, especially if they come from a source
that is known for its Ubuntu / Canonical
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 à 22:08 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair
On Sep 12, Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Debian (I maintain a couple packages too, and hopefully more in
the future, so I am not just trying to tell those who work what to do)
should consider only supporting unstable and testing for a few reasons:
Then people would need to
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/1394.bz2
Thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Le mar 12 septembre 2006 12:28, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to
build with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at
Am Dienstag 12 September 2006 12:28 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:28:24 +0200
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that recently
enough, for a foo-package I don't even remember (some python messages
that bounced to me). that is completely
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that
recently enough, for a foo-package I don't even remember (some
Gabriel Puliatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, maintainers _need_ to run unstable.
No, I don't agree here.
How else would they test the
latest package that has been uploaded and see if any bugs need to be
fixed before it moves into testing?
I'm running unstable in a chroot, but I hardly
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so the question is: what am i forgetting to do? i'm guessing that the
problem has something to do with the original package still being
present (as a metapackage)?
No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
moved from one
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 22:08 -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair fraction
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:32PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The whitelist field in mailman accepts regular expressions. This is
trivial.
If you can _find_ the whitelist field. It is very well hidden.
Oh, come on!
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at
* Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-31 07:55]:
Still open:
* kforth
(new Upstream)
Can you please file an O: bug?
Taken:
* festival, speech-tools
Franz Pletz
Franz, when will you upload?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-27 15:39]:
I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
libcapplet libglade oaf
gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian except for
gnucash.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:32PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The whitelist field in mailman accepts regular expressions. This is
trivial.
If you can
merge 385349 386991
thanks
Raphael == Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael There's already someone working on that: see #385349.
Raphael Please merge the bugs and work together.
Hey,
I have merged this bug. Sorry for the noise. James: would you like to do
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:19PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Isn't it a cause of stress trying to cram for the freeze?
Yes, but that doesn't mean it's not worth it.
I admit, just because something is hard does not mean it is not
worth it.
The question in my mind becomes: Is it
I forgot to give the URL for my package.
You can find the new version of libraw1394 to:
http://haydn.debian.org/~lr-guest/libraw1394/
Regards,
--
.---. Ludovic RESLINGER
/ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ Trumpet Student in CNR
/`\_/`\ Free Software Developer
// )X( \\
|
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:42:01AM -0300, Caio Begotti wrote:
Hello list, I think it's time to show you... this: http://cdbs.ueberalles.net
Many thanks for that work, it's really helpful.
A couple of suggestions/questions to make it even more helpful:
1) How often is updated the archive?
I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
I didn't get any usable help in the user list and I'm approaching a
state of despair ._.
I'll give a sequence of events (debian unstable on a
Thinkpad T20):
I recently did an aptitude upgrade, which upgraded udev to version
Caio == Caio Begotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Caio [please keep me in cc: for i am not subscribed to the
Caio 'debian-devel' list] Hello list, I think it's time to show
Caio you... this: http://cdbs.ueberalles.net
Caio It's an online gallery with all CDBS rules files used in
On Sep 12, Ruben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
threads about this problem (which is not related to udev).
ln: creating symbolic link
Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: twill
Version : 0.8.5
Upstream Author : C. Titus Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://twill.idyll.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A
On 9/12/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, Ruben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
threads about this problem (which is not related to udev).
ln:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:43, Ruben wrote:
On 9/12/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, Ruben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
threads
ok, it is a sysv-rc bug, read carefully (I got bitten by that yesterday, and
took a wrong direction in the beginning, but then fixed my course;-):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00258.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00255.html
So supposedly a
Your message was not posted to the debian-security-announce mailing list.
It has instead been forwarded to the security team and the listmaster team.
The debian-security-announce list is a moderated mailing list on
which security-related announcements are made by the security team for
Debian
Caio == Caio Begotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Caio That'd be awesome :-) thanks for replying about it
Hey,
It may be great to rate the debian/rules or maybe check that the
debian/rules are clean. Is it possible to do that ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 12, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: udev upgrade lead to an unbootable debian unstable
To: tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't worked with Knoppix much, but the general idea is to boot from
Knoppix, mount your root
On 12/09/2006, at 10:26, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Great idea. Maybe this link could be added in the cdbs
documentation as
examples?
That'd be awesome :-) thanks for replying about it
--
caio[1982] begotti
http://caio.ueberalles.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Caio == Caio Begotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Caio Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant? Also, if
Caio you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let me
Caio know.
Indeed, often, when you are written a debian/rules with cdbs for the
first time, it
On 12/09/2006, at 11:03, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
1) How often is updated the archive? (assuming it is)
Once a week, at the moment. I just need to make it a system's cron job.
2) I'm puzzled by the organization of the debian/rules. IMO having
them
classified on an alphabetic basis is
On 12/09/2006, at 14:00, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
It may be great to rate the debian/rules or maybe check
that the
debian/rules are clean. Is it possible to do that ?
Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant?
Also, if you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let
Joseph Smidt wrote:
The question in my mind becomes: Is it still worth it if the bulk of
people Stable is created for are better servered somewhere else?
You don't have a complete view on the situation, probably because
you're a geek. Stable is not limited to servers. Almost every
Joseph Smidt wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
What percentage run
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:20:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 16:05:55 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bzr-plugin-webserve
Version : web interface for bazaar-ng
Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnet-arp-perl
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Bastian Ballmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Net
* License : GPL + Artistic
Description
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so the question is: what am i forgetting to do? i'm guessing that the
problem has something to do with the original package still being
present (as a metapackage)?
No, it's a general
Marc Haber wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
I tend to doubt
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 07:23 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
At the risk of repeating myself, Desktop Users: For most non-server
minded people who still want a stable OS, Debian takes too long to
release. On top of that,many of them want a As easy aw Windows
distro. I don't know that
Am Dienstag 12 September 2006 22:29 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
Marc Haber wrote:
I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
users run unstable and
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch with a non attending maintainer,
just like
hey steve,
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
moved from one package to the other, no matter whether it declares
Replaces or whatever. There's simply no solution within dpkg at the
moment.
Hi David,
* David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 00:32]:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software
activity for the next couple of months for personal reasons.
Best wishes for your personal life!
Because of that, I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages.
[...]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take gparted.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Coin,
Caio Begotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12/09/2006, at 14:00, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant?
Also, if you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let me know.
Fact is people learning CDBS won't make a great example. So i'd rather
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
I already took it. Sorry.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gnome-mount
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/dist/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I'll take playground* and xchat-systray, but I'll be only able to work
on them after the next week-end.
Best regards,
Santiago
signature.asc
Package: wnpp
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: python-httplib2
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Joe Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://bitworking.org/projects/httplib2/
* License
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
César Gómez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
--
bye,
- Nacho
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:40:33AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
moved from one package to the other, no matter whether it declares
Replaces or whatever. There's
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The version numbers from popcon are much more interesting, but also
heavily skewed by eg, d-i defaulting to installing popcon in etch but
not in (released versions of) sarge.
Please also be aware that many of us who run stable on hundreds of
production
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
César Gómez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
It's all yours then :)
Cheers,
César
El Martes, 12 de Septiembre de 2006 18:21, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I will take care of parprouted
Toda la suerte david! (best of the luck, david!)
luciano
pgpULKwkNGAii.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:40:33AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
also, if you have an answer to the original question it'd be
appreciated. i'd really really like to avoid using ucf, since there's
something like 40 conffiles shared
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 23:54 -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira escreveu:
Sorry, discard message.
Kind Regards,
--
Fernando Ike - http://www.midstorm.org/~fike/weblog
Linux User 303638 - Debian User 352
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
On 9/13/06, David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch
reassign 385417 ftp.debian.org
retitle 385417 RM: gwrapguile -- RoQA; orphaned, obsolete library
thanks
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-27 15:39]:
I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I'll take gnome-schedule if none has done it.
--
Alejandro Ríos Peña
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:22:49 +0200
Source: hal
Binary: libhal-dev libhal-storage1 hal-doc libhal-storage-dev hal libhal1
hal-device-manager
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.5.7.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:04:04 -0700
Source: scm
Binary: scm
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 5e2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:19:54 -0500
Source: fvwm
Binary: fvwm fvwm-gnome
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.5.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:09:04 -0500
Source: libsemanage
Binary: libsemanage1 libsemanage1-dev python-semanage
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.16-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:10:35 +0100
Source: firefox-sage
Binary: firefox-sage
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alan Woodland [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:04:50 +0200
Source: libnet-lite-ftp-perl
Binary: libnet-lite-ftp-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.47-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:19:29 +0200
Source: subtitleeditor
Binary: subtitleeditor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Amaya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:35:33 -0500
Source: flex
Binary: flex-doc flex
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.5.33-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:57:50 +0100
Source: gramadoir
Binary: gramadoir liblingua-ga-gramadoir-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:32:43 +0200
Source: gst-plugins-good0.10
Binary: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good-doc gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
gstreamer0.10-esd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.10.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
