On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 12:31 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> When I try to paste text larger than about 500K from kedit into
> Firefox/Icewhatever kedit will give the above message on stderr and the
> operation will entirely fail (no data will be pasted).
>
> Would this be a bug in kedit or Firefox
Hi,
> > On Saturday 10 March 2007 19:15, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > > I'm in the process of updating several XML/SGML related packages. One
> > > is the docbook-xsl package, containing the DocBook XML DTDs. The
> > > current package contains the DTD for the (unofficial) version 3.1.7 and
> > > I wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: squeeze
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Stephan Arts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://squeeze.xfce.org/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : modern and a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zope-scriptablefields
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Sidnei da Silva, Daniel Nouri, Jens W. Klein
* URL : http://plone.org/products/ploneformgen/scriptablefields/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zope-atextensions
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Raphael Ritz, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://plone.org/products/atextensions
* License : GPL
Programming Lan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zope-cmfbibliographyat
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Raphael Ritz, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://plone.org/products/cmfbibliographyat
* License : GPL
Progr
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
>
> >Thank you, seems like. However http://www.agnula.info/download/ points
> >to a highchecked domain.
>
> What do you mean by "highchecked". Do you mean highjacked?
I assume so.
> I don't see any evidence for this assumpti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zope-ploneformgen
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Plone Collective
* URL : http://plone.org/products/ploneformgen
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Desc
On 3/13/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Wonder if SpamAssassin or similar is running on b.d.o.
Hahahahaha if it weren't running and discarding something like
99.99% (maybe more) of the mail that gets to b.d.o, we'd be drowning
in sp
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Wonder if SpamAssassin or similar is running on b.d.o.
Hahahahaha if it weren't running and discarding something like
99.99% (maybe more) of the mail that gets to b.d.o, we'd be drowning
in spam.
Don Armstrong
--
Nearly all men can stand adver
On 3/13/07, Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which is why there are occasionally bug reports that get closed by spam
sent to -done, unfortunately.
Of course, I should know that, I've seen it quite a few times.
Wondering whether the BTS should require a certain string in the email
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
Thank you, seems like. However http://www.agnula.info/download/ points
to a highchecked domain.
What do you mean by "highchecked". Do you mean highjacked?
I don't see any evidence for this assumption if I look at this
"Ploneish" site.
Maybe I'
Am Dienstag 09 Januar 2007 08:44 schrieb Nico Golde:
> http://www.agnula.info/ seems to be the new domain.
> Kind regards
Thank you, seems like. However http://www.agnula.info/download/ points
to a highchecked domain.
Maybe I'd rather go for the Suse Multimedia Live CD.
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/
fakechroot is a great idea for reducing the privileges needed for
pbuilder builds, and thus simplifying developer builds of packages.
However, if you look at the current bug set, it turns out that there
are half dozen bugs that actually get in the way of using it for that
purpose (there are anoth
* Warren Turkal:
> Educational reasons. I could see someone demonstrating breaking weak
> passwords
> with such a tool.
But you already need root privileges to install the Debian package,
which makes the whole thing not very convincing. Of course, it
doesn't matter how you get hold of such a t
Tim Brown wrote:
>> Nope since he that did not go to d-d. Maybe you can outline professional
>> uses in the description like done in the previous answers?
>
> As to previous answers, verbatim:
>
> I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
(..)
> companies using my
On 10956 March 1977, Tim Brown wrote:
> Why package it? Other than the practical uses outlined above, because having
> binaries on a system outside of the package management system is a PITA to
> keep track of / update and it makes building a new system very quick.
Why do I need a package for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/07 12:14, Tim Brown wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 17:06, you wrote:
>>> * Package name: sucrack
>>> Version : 1.1
>>> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
>>
> Nope since he that did not go to d-d. Maybe you can outline professional
> uses in the description like done in the previous answers?
As to previous answers, verbatim:
I'm packaging a bunch of security tools that I use in my job pen testing.
There are already a number of people both internall
On Monday 12 March 2007 17:06, you wrote:
> > * Package name: sucrack
> > Version : 1.1
> > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> > * License : GPL
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : multithre
This one time, at band camp, Hendrik Sattler said:
> Am Montag 12 März 2007 17:43 schrieb Warren Turkal:
> > On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian? It's not an
> > > administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security
Am Montag 12 März 2007 17:43 schrieb Warren Turkal:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian?
> > It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security
> > tests. I just can't see what the normal use of this too
This one time, at band camp, Kevin B. McCarty said:
> > * Package name: sucrack
> > Version : 1.1
> > Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> > * License : GPL
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description :
> * Package name: sucrack
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : multithreaded su bruteforcer
>
> sucrack is a multithreaded Linu
* Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-12 17:44]:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian?
> > It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security
> > tests. I just can't see what the normal use of thi
On Monday 12 March 2007 10:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Is there any real need for such a tool in Debian?
> It's not an administrative tool and it's obviously not meant for security
> tests. I just can't see what the normal use of this tool would be.
Educational reasons. I could see someone demons
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ma, 2007-03-12 at 20:29 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>> Does 'allowed' just mean 'it's impolite to close other peoples' bugs'
>> or 'the BTS will stop you'?
>
> It means "it's impolite...". The BTS software doesn't care.
Which is why there are occasionally bug report
Am Montag 12 März 2007 12:30 schrieb Tim Brown:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: sucrack
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libregexp-copy-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : James A. Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~jduncan/Regexp-Copy-0.06/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sucrack
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nico Leidecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.leidecker.info/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : multithr
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:08:34AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> I have preliminary 1.1 packages which I need to update to 1.1.1, and
>> once I've done that I'll be seeking a sponsor on debian-mentors unless
>> I am app
On 3/12/07, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On ma, 2007-03-12 at 20:29 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Does 'allowed' just mean 'it's impolite to close other peoples' bugs'
> or 'the BTS will stop you'?
It means "it's impolite...". The BTS software doesn't care.
Thanks for the clari
On ma, 2007-03-12 at 20:29 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Does 'allowed' just mean 'it's impolite to close other peoples' bugs'
> or 'the BTS will stop you'?
It means "it's impolite...". The BTS software doesn't care.
--
Fundamental truth #5: Always ask the simple troubleshooting questions
fir
On 3/12/07, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Isn't wnpp one of those pseudo-packages where anyone can close anything?
well, technically, anyone can close anywhere any bug with a -done or
control mail..
To quote the BTS documentation:
Normally, the only peop
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Isn't wnpp one of those pseudo-packages where anyone can close anything?
well, technically, anyone can close anywhere any bug with a -done or
control mail..
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interne
On 3/12/07, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Developers,
How can I close bug #387858 which is a duplicate of already closed
#406404?
Isn't wnpp one of those pseudo-packages where anyone can close anything?
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)ajdlinuxATex
On ma, 2007-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Hello Developers,
>
> How can I close bug #387858 which is a duplicate of already closed
> #406404?
>
> bluetooth-alsa package contains software for both SCO and A2DP profiles,
> and thus new package btsco is no longer need.
If it's
Hello Developers,
How can I close bug #387858 which is a duplicate of already closed
#406404?
bluetooth-alsa package contains software for both SCO and A2DP profiles,
and thus new package btsco is no longer need.
Thanks in advance,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.burghardt
38 matches
Mail list logo
