Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathanael Nerode: While on new installs it looks like this: -- # This is a list of hotpluggable network interfaces. # They will be activated automatically by the hotplug subsystem. And, as discussed before, this doesn't work reliably on all systems. 8-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Bastian Venthur
Florian Weimer schrieb: * Nathanael Nerode: While on new installs it looks like this: -- # This is a list of hotpluggable network interfaces. # They will be activated automatically by the hotplug subsystem. And, as discussed before, this doesn't work reliably on all systems. 8-(

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Joey Hess
Bastian Venthur wrote: I've written a bugreport (#403706) which was discussed for a long time until it finally was downgraded from grave to important and became a documentation issue the for release-notes. A questionable move especially since I know from debian-user-german that many users

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Joey Hess
Nathanael Nerode wrote: (I would add this to the Wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgrade but someone made it immutable...) Seems editable here.. #1. Just noticed that /etc/network/interfaces is set up differently on new installs; it uses udev/hotplug now by default, while it

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:30:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: (I would add this to the Wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgrade but someone made it immutable...) The information you posted belongs to release-notes's BTS, not to the wiki (as the wiki tries to track a sarge-etch

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:30:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: (I would add this to the Wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgrade but someone made it immutable...) The information you posted

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 3/26/07, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I would add this to the Wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgrade but someone made it immutable...) It's not immutable when you log in. -- Andrew Donnellan ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)

Re: daylight saving time and RTC clock

2007-03-26 Thread Brian May
Santiago == Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Santiago Why don't you just keep your RTC to UTC? It worked for Santiago me. It breaks if you need to dual boot to a competing operating system and keep track of times. Hmmm. What was it called again? I think it was this Windows

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 26, Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've written a bugreport (#403706) which was discussed for a long time until it finally was downgraded from grave to important and became a documentation issue the for release-notes. Hopefully for lenny we will switch to upstart, which will

Re: daylight saving time and RTC clock

2007-03-26 Thread A Mennucc
hi thanks anyone yes, in the past I had to accomodate for dual booting into that peculiar other operating system (hereby called Windows, as by Santiago suggestion) : I developed gtkmorph in the past, and it had to run on both O.S.es ; but nowadays I dont, so I think I will switch my RTC to UTC,

Re: release update: d-i schedule, release notes, deep freeze

2007-03-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Friday 23 March 2007 13:54, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: We still have no usable linux-source deb. The prepatched source currently shipped will not build vserver, xen and several archs and the debian patch is not compatible to make-kpkg and it

Kernel selection in the installation system

2007-03-26 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, when installing a Debian etch machine, the installation system automatically selects the kernel which is most appropriate for the CPU and installs the corresponding kernel package on the harddisk of the machine. Can anybody tell me how the installer decides which kernel to be installed?

Re: Kernel selection in the installation system

2007-03-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 26 March 2007 17:24, Christoph Pleger wrote: Can anybody tell me how the installer decides which kernel to be installed? Or tell me where I can find the source code of the selection process? It is done from the /var/lib/dpkg/base-installer.postinst script, which calls an

Re: Kernel selection in the installation system

2007-03-26 Thread Lawrence Williams
IIRC, the kernel udeb in the installer image runs the installer kernel during installation and the installer checks for the CPU type. You can use the 'expert' install option to be given the opportunity to manually select which kernel is installed during installation. - Lawrence On March 26,

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Ivan Jager
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Joey Hess wrote: Nathanael Nerode wrote: [...] On old installs it looks like this: # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian installation auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp - While on new installs it looks like this: -- #

Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, I have spent the past few days trying to figure out why some of our machines seem to have ethernet interface numbers that jump around -- eth0 one day, then eth4 or eth5 another. The culprit comes down to udev. I've filed a bug #416284 against it for this. Basically, udev is trying to

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 26 March 2007 10:11, John Goerzen wrote: I have spent the past few days trying to figure out why some of our machines seem to have ethernet interface numbers that jump around -- eth0 one day, then eth4 or eth5 another. As a corollary to this, I have machines where the disks swap

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Russ Allbery
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have spent the past few days trying to figure out why some of our machines seem to have ethernet interface numbers that jump around -- eth0 one day, then eth4 or eth5 another. The culprit comes down to udev. I've filed a bug #416284 against it for

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Russ Allbery: There's actually some stuff in udev or some related package to deal with this, but I can't ever seem to find it when I need it. I think this is actually a documentation bug more than a functionality bug; we just need a better guide on how to do it. You can, somehow, assign

Re: More stuff the installer does which isn't done on upgrade

2007-03-26 Thread Bastian Venthur
Joey Hess schrieb: Bastian Venthur wrote: I've written a bugreport (#403706) which was discussed for a long time until it finally was downgraded from grave to important and became a documentation issue the for release-notes. A questionable move especially since I know from debian-user-german

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 26, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the right thing to do is to assign the persistent names to network devices that still exist in the system, but to do nothing with any other network devices. That will allow systems to still boot and come up properly in the face of

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:35:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Mar 26, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the right thing to do is to assign the persistent names to network devices that still exist in the system, but to do nothing with any other network devices. That

Re: racoon and bug 372665

2007-03-26 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Milan, Milan P. Stanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:36:34PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: Milan P Stanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to discuss problem with regards to bug #372665. Why the racoon should be started in the rcS when even ssh is not?

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:42:54 -0500, John Goerzen wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:35:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Mar 26, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the right thing to do is to assign the persistent names to network devices that still exist in the

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

2007-03-26 Thread Alan Ezust
I tried building using make-kpkg with --initrd binary options, and ended up with a cpio archive. Why? I have no idea. I looked at the output of the make-kpkg command and was unable to determine which tool it was using to make the initramfs. I suggest some output be generated that shows not only

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 26 März 2007 19:26 schrieb Florian Weimer: * Russ Allbery: There's actually some stuff in udev or some related package to deal with this, but I can't ever seem to find it when I need it. I think this is actually a documentation bug more than a functionality bug; we just need a

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Julien Cristau: I think the problem is that you can't know in advance whether the device still exists or not, and whether it will be plugged in later (because everything runs asynchronously). Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the norm. It seems wrong to

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

2007-03-26 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 26 March 2007 12:09, Alan Ezust wrote: I tried building using make-kpkg with  --initrd binary options, and ended up with a cpio archive. Why? I have no idea. An initramfs is a cpio archive. I am assuming that are you referring to the file created after the kernel is installed. Is

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:15:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the norm. It seems wrong to optimize for this case. udev sees network devices, not pci devices. and hotpluggable network devices are common. Bastian -- A woman

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:15:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the norm. It seems wrong to optimize for this case. udev sees network devices, not pci devices.

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:54:45PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: The trouble is that nowadays, the kernel does not assign predictable interface names, and an increasing number of systems has got more than one Ethernet interface. The downside is that typical Debian installations aren't

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

2007-03-26 Thread Alan Ezust
Yes, I'm referring to the initrd.img-2.6.16.XX-bla-di-blah file that is installed by dpkg when I install the generated kernel-image .deb file that I created using make-kpkg (--initrd binary).. On 3/26/07, Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 26 March 2007 12:09, Alan Ezust wrote:

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:41:26PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:54:45PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: You only need to delete /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent*.rules before udev runs. That should be doable and could be a configuration option. The default

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bastian Blank: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:15:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the norm. It seems wrong to optimize for this case. udev sees network devices, not pci devices. and hotpluggable network devices are common. It

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Il giorno 26/mar/07, alle ore 21:29, Mark Brown ha scritto: The use cases where users are likely to notice are relatively limited - you need to either be trying to do some sort of system imaging or doing hardware replacement where you need to do a like for like swap. The latter case tends

Re: fakechroot - anyone using it, should I consider hijacking it?

2007-03-26 Thread Mark Clarkson
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 00:04 -0400, Mark Eichin wrote: I certainly have seen lots of packages build correctly with fakechroot as-shipped - and these fixes should significantly raise that number. The more people that use fakechroot the better, but I suppose the thing that scares me a little is

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:11:32PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: 1. Some ethernet cards like Sun QuadFE share the same MAC address (even if global OpenFirmware option is set to different MAC-address) and PCI id and udev blocks while renaming them, leaving with an unusable systema each

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

2007-03-26 Thread Alan Ezust
Ah, I see. the initrd is created at install time, not at .deb package building time. I inspected the generated .deb file and indeed, there is no initrd.img in the .deb file - the initrd is created when you actually install the package on the target system, which means it's the target system that

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Hi John! On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, John Goerzen wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:28:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:15:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the norm. It seems wrong to optimize for this

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Russ Allbery: There's actually some stuff in udev or some related package to deal with this, but I can't ever seem to find it when I need it. I think this is actually a documentation bug more than a functionality bug; we just need a better guide on

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:11:32PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: BTW, there's no easy way to recover from a badly renamed ethernet interface. Once you have something like 'eth5_rename' how are you supposed to recover? As you would do for a normal interface rename: ip link set

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Heya, As a corollary to this, I have machines where the disks swap device files on each boot. It's pretty annoying when my nfs volumes switch which device name is used to mount them. you could mount them by UUID instead of the device name. Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:40:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: Still the exception, not the norm. No, ever since distros started using modular kernels, hotplug _is_ the norm. You can get rid of it only by building your own kernel image with all hardware drivers statically built in and module

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:00:05AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: you could mount them by UUID instead of the device name. Btw. do Debian initrds already support specifying the root fs with LABEL= like Fedora/RedHat? Gabor -- -

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:41:26PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:54:45PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: The trouble is that nowadays, the kernel does not assign predictable interface names, and an increasing number of systems has got more than one Ethernet

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: * dmesg output still mentions hardware using eth0, even if you can't talk to it at eth0 but must instead use eth5. dmesg doesn't mention this fact, making it difficult to track down problems. It's nothing new, this is the

Re: racoon and bug 372665

2007-03-26 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:05:53PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote: Milan P. Stanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: README says that in the /etc/rcS.d/ should go scripts which are executed once during boot. In debian policy manual rcS.d is mentioned only once in section 9.3.4, but from short description

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Btw. do Debian initrds already support specifying the root fs with LABEL= like Fedora/RedHat? Didn't try it, but according to [1] they do. Cheers, Bernd [1] http://wiki.debian.org/InitrdReplacementOptions -- Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzed.de/ --

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Luigi Gangitano may or may not have written... [snip] 1. Some ethernet cards like Sun QuadFE share the same MAC address (even if global OpenFirmware option is set to different MAC-address) and PCI id and udev blocks while renaming them, leaving with an unusable systema each time

Re: racoon and bug 372665

2007-03-26 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Milan, Milan P. Stanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:05:53PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote: Milan P. Stanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: README says that in the /etc/rcS.d/ should go scripts which are executed once during boot. In debian policy manual rcS.d is mentioned

Attempted summary and thoughts (was Re: On maintainers not responding to bugs)

2007-03-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I've been reading the discussion and trying to thresh something out of it. Four points and one proposal. Point 1. --- Contrary to some assumptions, answering I got your bug report but I can't deal with it right now is *very* useful, particularly in encouraging people to help. I've reported

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts (was Re: On maintainers not responding to bugs)

2007-03-26 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:12:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: If a package has a bug with a *patch* attached, where the *patch* has not been reviewed on by the maintainer(s) within six months, the package will be orphaned immediately; the maintainer will not be allowed to adopt it

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts

2007-03-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, after describing the worst-case scenario, I am going to make a new tentative proposal: If a package has a bug with a *patch* attached, where the *patch* has not been reviewed on by the maintainer(s) within six months, the package

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts

2007-03-26 Thread Ben Finney
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been reading the discussion and trying to thresh something out of it. Thanks very much for taking the time to do this. A summary of a long thread is useful. Four points and one proposal. I agree with all the points. I won't comment on the

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts

2007-03-26 Thread Ben Finney
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If no one has time to work on a package, orphaning the package doesn't make it better. In that case, orphaning the package doesn't make it better. I think Nathaniel was describing the case where people *do* have the time, and indeed are proposing fixes

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts (was Re: On maintainers not responding to bugs)

2007-03-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Out of curiousity, what is the algorithm for determining whether a patch has been reviewed? If it is not an algorithm, per se, then what is the heuristic? If the maintainer has sent a message to the bug trail mentioning the patch sometime after the

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts

2007-03-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If that person has showed up and is being blocked from helping for some reason, *then* we can talk. I think that's what the proposal is suggesting. Do you think the metric used is bad, or is there some other flaw?

Re: racoon and bug 372665

2007-03-26 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
Jörg == Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can't raccon be started like wpa_supplicant by an ifup command? You can start the wpa_supplicant by bringing up the interface: ,[ /etc/network/interfaces ]--- | iface eth1 inet manual | wpa_roam /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf |

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
After writing a very long message, I realize that there was a much simpler solution, so if you want to cut to the chase, skip to the end! Steve Langasek wrote: Which do you think is the common case -- a system with more than one network interface where it's necessary to preserve interface

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:01:13AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: No, ever since distros started using modular kernels, hotplug _is_ the norm. debian (and other distros) used modular kernels (2.4.18 in woody) without hotplug or the like. You can get rid of it only by building your own kernel

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:06:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: After writing a very long message, I realize that there was a much simpler solution, so if you want to cut to the chase, skip to the end! Steve Langasek wrote: Which do you think is the common case -- a system with more than

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:39:55AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:01:13AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: No, ever since distros started using modular kernels, hotplug _is_ the norm. debian (and other distros) used modular kernels (2.4.18 in woody) without hotplug

Re: Ethernet interface numbering in etch

2007-03-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:06:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After writing a very long message, I realize that there was a much simpler solution, so if you want to cut to the chase, skip to the end! Steve Langasek wrote: Which do you think is the common case -- a

Re: Attempted summary and thoughts (was Re: On maintainers not responding to bugs)

2007-03-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People should be given assistance and encouragement in doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively little time (sick family members). I like doing bug triage as well. I

Accepted kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta2-4 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Meskes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:07:27 +0100 Source: kdebluetooth Binary: kdebluetooth-irmcsync qobex kdebluetooth Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99+1.0beta2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted clanlib 0.6.5-1-4 (source all amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:52:10 +0200 Source: clanlib Binary: libclan2c2a-network libclan2c2a-lua libclan2c2a-gui clanlib-doc libclan2c2a-vorbis clanlib-examples libclanlib2c2a libclan2c2a-png libclan2c2a-sound libclan2c2a-jpeg

Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 (source all powerpc)

2007-03-26 Thread Bastian Blank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:12:17 +0200 Source: linux-2.6 Binary: linux-image-2.6.18-4-powerpc-miboot linux-headers-2.6.18-4-parisc-smp linux-modules-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-amd64 linux-headers-2.6.18-4-vserver-amd64

Accepted eazel-engine 0.3-6 (source amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:16:03 +0200 Source: eazel-engine Binary: gtk-engines-eazel Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.3-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael

Accepted noffle 1.2.0~rc1-6 (source amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:06:46 +0200 Source: noffle Binary: noffle Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.0~rc1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL

Accepted laptop-netconf 0.9.6.7 (source amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:12:43 +0200 Source: laptop-netconf Binary: laptop-netconf Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.6.7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael

Accepted ptex-jtex 1.7+1-10 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Atsuhito KOHDA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:59:51 +0900 Source: ptex-jtex Binary: ptex-jtex Architecture: source all Version: 1.7+1-10 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Atsuhito KOHDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA [EMAIL

Accepted ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Debian packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:43:48 +0100 Source: ffmpeg Binary: libavformat-dev libavformat0d ffmpeg libavcodec-dev libpostproc0d libpostproc-dev libavcodec0d Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.cvs20060823-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

Accepted gnome-pkg-tools 0.11 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:34:12 +0200 Source: gnome-pkg-tools Binary: gnome-pkg-tools Architecture: source all Version: 0.11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Loic Minier

Accepted libssh 0.2+svn20070321-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Laurent Bigonville
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:06:40 +0200 Source: libssh Binary: libssh-2-dev libssh-2-dbg libssh-2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2+svn20070321-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester [EMAIL

Accepted dwm 3.8-4 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:51:00 +0100 Source: dwm Binary: dwm Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.8-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted xmms-crossfade 0.3.12-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Kartik Mistry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:54:25 +0530 Source: xmms-crossfade Binary: bmp-crossfade audacious-crossfade xmms-crossfade Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kartik Mistry [EMAIL

Accepted boost 1.33.1+1.34.0-cvs20070221-1 (source all i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Domenico Andreoli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:47:15 +0100 Source: boost Binary: libboost-signals1.34.0 libboost-wave-dev libboost-iostreams-dev libboost-test-dev libboost-test1.34.0 libboost-filesystem1.34.0 libboost-serialization-dev libboost-regex1.34.0

Accepted libgnomekbd 2.18.0-1 (source i386 all)

2007-03-26 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:49:14 +0200 Source: libgnomekbd Binary: libgnomekbd-common libgnomekbdui-dev libgnomekbdui1 libgnomekbd-dev gkbd-capplet libgnomekbd1 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.18.0-1 Distribution: experimental

Accepted latex2rtf 1.9.16a-3 (source all amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Chris Lawrence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:07:17 -0500 Source: latex2rtf Binary: latex2rtf-doc latex2rtf Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.9.16a-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Chris

Accepted fuse 2.6.3-2 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Le_Vert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:10:31 +0100 Source: fuse Binary: libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-utils Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.6.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Adam Cécile

Accepted gnome-user-docs 2.18.0-1 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:02:46 +0200 Source: gnome-user-docs Binary: gnome-user-guide Architecture: source all Version: 2.18.0-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted postgresql-common 73 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Martin Pitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:51:27 +0200 Source: postgresql-common Binary: postgresql-client-common postgresql-common Architecture: source all Version: 73 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted postfix 2.4.0~rc9-1 (source all i386)

2007-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:55:15 -0600 Source: postfix Binary: postfix-pcre postfix postfix-pgsql postfix-doc postfix-ldap postfix-cdb postfix-dev postfix-mysql Architecture: all i386 source Version: 2.4.0~rc9-1 Distribution: experimental

Accepted ekg 1:1.7~rc2-2 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Marcin Owsiany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:53:19 +0100 Source: ekg Binary: ekg libgadu3 libgadu-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.7~rc2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany

Accepted newsbeuter 0.3-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Nico Golde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:06:57 +0100 Source: newsbeuter Binary: newsbeuter Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted quantlib-swig 0.4.1-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:01:54 -0500 Source: quantlib-swig Binary: quantlib-ruby quantlib-python Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted kdelibs 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-7 (source i386 all)

2007-03-26 Thread Ana Beatriz Guerrero Lopez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:57:14 +0100 Source: kdelibs Binary: kdelibs4c2a kdelibs kdelibs4-doc kdelibs-dbg kdelibs-data kdelibs4-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer:

Accepted ion3-scripts 20061214-2 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:27:51 +0200 Source: ion3-scripts Binary: ion3-scripts Architecture: source all Version: 20061214-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski

Accepted newsbeuter 0.3-2 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Nico Golde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:22:07 +0200 Source: newsbeuter Binary: newsbeuter Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted pyblosxom 1.3.2-6 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:18:46 +0200 Source: pyblosxom Binary: pyblosxom Architecture: source all Version: 1.3.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL

Accepted libembperl-perl 2.2.0-1.2 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Gunnar Wolf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:49:17 -0600 Source: libembperl-perl Binary: libembperl-perl Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.0-1.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Angus Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL

Accepted gaim-thinklight 0.7-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Joachim Breitner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:37:24 +0200 Source: gaim-thinklight Binary: gaim-thinklight Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joachim Breitner

Accepted ion3-mod-ionflux 20061022-4 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:07:35 +0200 Source: ion3-mod-ionflux Binary: ion3-mod-ionflux Architecture: source i386 Version: 20061022-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert

Accepted maxima 5.11.0-1 (source all i386)

2007-03-26 Thread Camm Maguire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:37:26 -0400 Source: maxima Binary: maxima-test maxima-share maxima-emacs maxima-doc maxima-src xmaxima maxima Architecture: source all i386 Version: 5.11.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm

Accepted metacity 1:2.18.0-1 (source i386 all)

2007-03-26 Thread Loic Minier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:27:08 +0200 Source: metacity Binary: metacity-common metacity libmetacity0 libmetacity-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:2.18.0-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Marco Cabizza [EMAIL

Accepted cdrkit 9:1.1.3-1 (source all amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:31:24 +0200 Source: cdrkit Binary: cdda2wav mkisofs cdrkit-doc genisoimage cdrecord wodim icedax Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 9:1.1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Joerg Jaspert

Accepted openmsx 0.6.2~pre2-1 (source i386 all)

2007-03-26 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:18:58 + Source: openmsx Binary: openmsx openmsx-data Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.6.2~pre2-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Joost Yervante Damad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted gcc-snapshot 20070326-1 (source amd64)

2007-03-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:40:10 +0100 Source: gcc-snapshot Binary: gcc-snapshot Architecture: source amd64 Version: 20070326-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Changed

Accepted lwat 0.13-2 (source all)

2007-03-26 Thread Patrick Winnertz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:40:37 +0200 Source: lwat Binary: lwat Architecture: source all Version: 0.13-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Patrick Winnertz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Patrick Winnertz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted fish 1.22.3-1 (source i386)

2007-03-26 Thread James Vega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:00:39 -0400 Source: fish Binary: fish Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.22.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

  1   2   >