free adalt passwords
www 32action dot cn
six warriorwise
boast censure
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bonjour,
je suis en train de faire de la place dans ma cave et j'ai un
certain nombre de machines Sparc qui vont partir à la poubelle
à moins que certains d'entre vous soient intéressés pour les
récupérer. Ce sont des vieilles machines 32 bits (pas ultra).
Elles m'avaient servi lorsque j'ai
Hello everybody!
[[ I already sent this mail to debian-user - but it didn't seem to get there.
Thinking about it once again, I'm re-posting to -devel. ]]
As I'm running unstable I sometimes find bugs in applications. Now it would be
very nice if there was some way to get the matching debug
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
How about compiling all programs with debugging information, and strip them
into a -dbginfo package, or something likewise for apt-get source? Like
the -dev packages only people who think they need them would install them,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:07:47AM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Hi,
Hi tokkee :)
This is already done for a number of packages. The package names should have
the prefix -dbg and install all debugging symbols to /usr/lib/debug/path so
they are installable with apt-get / aptitude just like any
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:16:12AM +0200, Mario Iseli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mhh'k... Archivesize... How many percent of the whole mirrorsize belong to
-dbg
packages?
Well, if the whole archive was to have debug packages, they would take a
significant amount of space.
Mike
--
To
Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
config/suites file ?
Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
Ritesh
Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on
invocation and it will see
Mario Iseli wrote:
True, true, true... I guess it's a good solution as we have it now, if the
maintainer thinks a -dbg package would be useful, he/she can create one and
provide it to the users. I personally wouldn't do that for smaller packages
which are compiled on normal modern i386 stuff
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
Currently I'd have to recompile the packages myself, and installing them over
the debian files - which is, depending on the package and its prerequisites,
a major hazzle.
The package maintainers provide the debugging
On 10/8/07, Philipp Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I'm running unstable I sometimes find bugs in applications.
Now it would be very nice if there was some way to get the
matching debug information for the packages, so gdb could print
a better backtrace, or eg. show exactly which line
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild of
the archive using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 and submit bugs as I find them.
The bugs will be wishlist for now, and I'll assign usertag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ftbfs-parallel to those bug reports for those
interested in tracking
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:53:05AM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild of
the archive using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 and submit bugs as I find them.
The bugs will be wishlist for now, and I'll assign usertag
[EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:53:05AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild of
the archive using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 and submit bugs as I find them.
The bugs will be wishlist for now, and I'll assign usertag
[EMAIL
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
config/suites file ?
Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
Ritesh
Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
How about compiling all programs with debugging information, and strip them
into a -dbginfo package, or something likewise for apt-get source? Like
the -dev packages only people who think they need them would install them,
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:49:09 am Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:53:05AM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild
of the archive using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 and submit bugs as I find
them. The bugs will be
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:07:12PM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:49:09 am Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:53:05AM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild
of the archive using
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071008 05:46]:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
config/suites file ?
Currently it only has code names like etch/lenny/sid.
Ritesh
Does it matter
On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 11:51:12 +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
I'd assume it's not so much the binary size of the packages, but the
number of them ... that's why I asked whether a new branch might be
better for them. Like stable, testing, unstable, experimental
... dbginfo. Then normal users
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:50:58 am Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:53:05AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg, I'm going to try doing a rebuild
of the archive using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 and submit bugs as I find
them. The bugs will
Anyway, I'm aware a lot of packages will probably break at the moment, which
is why I'm using wishlist.
I still believe that you should not file such bugs, I still fail to
see how it improves debian, as if we really need to build more packages
at the same time, we could run many sbuild
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:50:58PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
in the latter case, is there any conventional way to parse DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
last time i read about it there were a couple of ways both having dark
sides... ah.. BTW google is not able to provide me any documentation
of
It's documented in Debian policy, but parallel hasn't been added there yet.
I
think the new dpkg-buildpackage -jn passes
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n.
this sounds like it should not break things, as you have to evaluate
that manually. Or is there some magic which results into $(MAKE)
On Monday 08 October 2007 08:07:12 am Daniel Schepler wrote:
Especially when the easy work-around, if you don't want to bother adding
the proper dependencies to the make targets, is just to add .NOPARALLEL:
somewhere in the Makefile.
Sorry, that should be .NOTPARALLEL:.
--
Daniel Schepler
Hi
Dne Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:51:12 +0200
Philipp Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
I'd assume it's not so much the binary size of the packages, but the number
of
them ... that's why I asked whether a new branch might be better for them.
Like stable, testing, unstable, experimental ...
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:21:22AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:50:58 am Domenico Andreoli wrote:
in the latter case, is there any conventional way to parse
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS? last time i read about it there were a couple of ways
both having dark sides...
On Monday 08 October 2007 08:30:53 am Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:07:12PM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:49:09 am Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:53:05AM +, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Inspired by today's new upload of
On Monday 08 October 2007 08:39:21 am Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
It's documented in Debian policy, but parallel hasn't been added there
yet. I think the new dpkg-buildpackage -jn passes
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n.
this sounds like it should not break things, as you have to evaluate
that
On Monday 08 October 2007 08:30:53 am Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I still believe that you should not file such bugs, I still fail to
see how it improves debian, as if we really need to build more packages
at the same time, we could run many sbuild instances on the same
machine.
OK, how about
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:21:22AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007 07:50:58 am Domenico Andreoli wrote:
in the latter case, is there any conventional way to parse
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS? last time i
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:30:53PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I still believe that you should not file such bugs, I still fail to
see how it improves debian, as if we really need to build more packages
at the same time, we could run many sbuild instances on the same
machine.
It isn't
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:58:17PM +, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:30:53PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I still believe that you should not file such bugs, I still fail to
see how it improves debian, as if we really need to build more packages
at the same time,
Hi
Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:33:12 +0200
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
That said, I believe most of the packages I package are autoconf/cmake
based or are small enough so that a parallel build is useless, so I
probably wont be annoyed here.
BTW: When mentioning CMake, are
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +, Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:33:12 +0200
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
That said, I believe most of the packages I package are autoconf/cmake
based or are small enough so that a parallel build is useless, so I
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of copies.
I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of copies.
I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea.
I would
Hello
Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:46:46 +0200
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +, Michal Čihař wrote:
BTW: When mentioning CMake, are there any known problems with parallel
build with it? I just randomly tried it last week and it seemed to be
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:59:17AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of copies.
I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the
Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2007, 00:00 +0900 schrieb Michal Čihař:
Hello
Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:46:46 +0200
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +, Michal Čihař wrote:
BTW: When mentioning CMake, are there any known problems with parallel
free adalt passwords
www 32action dot cn
foldout begiggle
sparring subscripture
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:12:12AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Is there a reason to not use stable/testing/unstable as the names in
config/suites file ?
Yes. It needs to get the Release file before setting up the parts which
needs to know the codename. The code which did that was removed
On Monday 08 October 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Does it matter anywhere? You can use testing as suite name on
invocation and it will see that testing currently is lenny and use
that.
I think it does.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ my-pbuilder-unstable.sh create
W: /home/rrs/.pbuilderrc does not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: edac-utils
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Mark Grondona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL v.2
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: perforce
Version : 2007.2-2
Upstream Author : Perforce Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.perforce.com/
* License : proprietary
Programming Lang: binary only (with
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 07:30:09PM +0100, Sam Clegg wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: perforce
Version : 2007.2-2
Upstream Author : Perforce Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.perforce.com/
*
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when it is
non-free.
How about people use it? There's plenty of installations of
perforce; I
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 07:52:55PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when it is
non-free.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gilles Filippini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: nted-doc
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Jörg Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://vsr.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/staff/jan/nted/
* License : GFDL
Programming Lang:
* Pierre Habouzit:
How about people use it? There's plenty of installations of
perforce;
s/perforce/windows/ and the sentence is still true ;)
The Windows copyright is pretty restrictive AFAIK. If it weren't, I'm
certain we hould ship things like Virtualbox VMs in non-free because
there
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me that this depends on Perforce. D'oh.
(I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous
software. But perhaps it's just non-free.)
Perforce is an absolutely *excellent* VCS with the unfortunate
distinction of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of copies.
I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not mistaken Joey refuses the idea.
Maybe
OK, changes in dpkg-dev 1.14.7 have forced my hand a little and
dpkg-cross 2.0.0 has now been uploaded to Debian unstable (not
experimental) a little ahead of schedule.
apt-cross 0.2.9 has been uploaded to Emdebian unstable - dependent on
dpkg-cross = 1.99 and is available to anyone using the
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:32:23PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit:
I think making it easier to use Debian with them is
within the mandate for non-free.
There is ways to interact with perforce in debian, in a free way:
git-p4 being one of them.
| * The import does not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Gerasiov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kxneur
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Vadim Likhota vadim-lvv{a}yandex.ru
* URL : http://www.xneur.ru/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
It looks like there are even more problems than I thought with the parallel
builds, so I won't be able to submit bugs on them all in a timely manner. So
for now, I've posted the build logs so far at
http://people.debian.org/~schepler/build-logs/ if you want to see the results
sooner. At this
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of copies.
I'd vote for that too, though if I'm not
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
instead of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: php-xml-htmlsax3
Version : 3.0.0~rc1
Upstream Author : Harry Fuecks
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/XML_HTMLSax3/
* License : PHP
Programming Lang: PHP
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: php-html-safe
Version : 0.9.9~beta
Upstream Author : Roman Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Safe
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: PHP
Hi
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:30:37 +0200
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trivial example: a package that builds a binary which in turn is used to
create some source files for later compile.
If the source files don't have the binary as dependency, your build will
break with parallel
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when it is
non-free.
How about people use it? There's plenty of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: docvert
Version : 3.3rc2
Upstream Author : Matthew Cruickshank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.docvert.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Description
Hi,
[An earl=ier version of this mail did not go through, perhaps
because of the embedded images. I have now pulled the images out
on to my blog server]
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:53:05 -0400, Daniel Schepler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Inspired by today's new upload of dpkg,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:12:30 +0200
Source: devhelp
Binary: libdevhelp-1-0 devhelp-common devhelp libdevhelp-1-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gustavo Noronha Silva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:15:12 +0200
Source: libsoup
Binary: libsoup2.2-doc libsoup2.2-8 libsoup2.2-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.2.101-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:18:46 +0900
Source: nabi
Binary: nabi
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:30:28 +0100
Source: netkit-telnet-ssl
Binary: telnet-ssl telnetd-ssl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17.24+0.1-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:52:45 +0200
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:15:00 +0200
Source: acpi-support
Binary: acpi-support
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.103-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Samwel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bart Samwel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:30:00 +0200
Source: rkward
Binary: rkward
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Friedrichsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Friedrichsmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:03:47 +0200
Source: gnatsweb
Binary: gnatsweb
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.00-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:02:41 +0200
Source: cdd
Binary: cdd-dev cdd-common cdd-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Tille [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:03:17 +0200
Source: m-tx
Binary: m-tx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.60-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:57:30 +0200
Source: fusd-kor
Binary: libfusd-dev libfusd1 fusd-kor-source
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.10+11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:30:55 +0200
Source: fusd-kor
Binary: fusd-kor-source
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10+11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:51:43 +0200
Source: gst-fluendo-mpegdemux
Binary: gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mpegdemux
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Maintainers of GStreamer packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:03:53 +0200
Source: gst-fluendo-mpegmux
Binary: gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mpegmux
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Maintainers of GStreamer packages [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:05:20 +0200
Source: libtsmux
Binary: libtsmux-dev libtsmux0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Maintainers of GStreamer packages [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:16:10 -0400
Source: zekr-quran-translations-en
Binary: zekr-quran-translations-en
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mohammad Derakhshani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:44:47 +0200
Source: sacjava
Binary: libsac-java-doc libsac-java-gcj libsac-java
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:02:02 +0200
Source: imagej
Binary: imagej
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.39b-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Paolo Ariano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Paolo Ariano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:10:14 +0200
Source: gnome-icon-theme-yasis
Binary: gnome-icon-theme-yasis
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:46:40 +0100
Source: xfce4-utils
Binary: xfce4-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:28:48 +0200
Source: egroupware
Binary: egroupware-news-admin egroupware-felamimail egroupware-polls
egroupware-calendar egroupware egroupware-bookmarks egroupware-wiki
egroupware-sambaadmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:51:00 +0200
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:47:58 +0900
Source: canna-shion
Binary: canna-shion
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.20010204-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yukiharu YABUKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Yukiharu YABUKI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:36:22 +0200
Source: php-memcache
Binary: php5-memcache
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:43:19 +0200
Source: python-django-registration
Binary: python-django-registration
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3p5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:46:07 +0200
Source: beep
Binary: beep beep-udeb
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.2-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:29:45 +0200
Source: lshw
Binary: lshw lshw-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 02.11.01-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:52:58 +0200
Source: sdl-mixer1.2
Binary: libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-mixer1.2-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:49:24 -0400
Source: netfilter-extensions
Binary: netfilter-extensions-source
Architecture: source all
Version: 20070915+debian-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:10:37 +0200
Source: rungetty
Binary: rungetty
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:09:11 -0400
Source: ipset
Binary: ipset
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:44:40 +0200
Source: gnomeradio
Binary: gnomeradio
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francesco Namuri [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:22:35 +0300
Source: fet
Binary: fet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:32:59 +0200
Source: zeroc-ice-python
Binary: python-zeroc-ice
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francisco Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francisco Moya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:31:06 +0530
Source: pkpgcounter
Binary: pkpgcounter
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kumar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:09:57 +0200
Source: wims-modules-es
Binary: wims-extra-es
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.62-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Georges Khaznadar
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
