Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libppix-editortools-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Steffen Mueller C
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-EditorTools/
* License : Artisti
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
> seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing.
Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.30-2;arc
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libautobox-perl
Version : 2.55
Upstream Author : chocolateboy
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/autobox/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: gerbmerge
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Andrew Sterian
* URL : http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/~steriana/Python/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A Gerber-file
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> > what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about?
>
> The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be
> unblocked.
Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
seemed to me like a valid reason not t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Bolton
* Package name: kwin-style-nitrogen
Version : 2.3.4
Upstream Author : Hugo Pereira
* URL :
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/Nitrogen?content=99551
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: autokey
Version : 0.54.4
Upstream Author : Chris Dekter
* URL : http://autokey.sf.net
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : text expansion and hotkey utility
Aut
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
>> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
>> of the kernel team...
>
> it is mostly done, beside the s
Sorry, I don't understood the question.
The PC have a RJ-45 connector? Can be that a "net plu"g is a serial console
too.
I have installed Debian in SunFire V120 (Sparc maquine with RJ-45 connector
"serial console") through hyperterminal with the standard Debian
installation CD
A possible alternat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: qconf
Version: 1.4
Upstream Author: Justin Karneges
URL: http://delta.affinix.com/qconf/
License: GPL2
Description: QConf allows
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
> of the kernel team...
it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep,
http://www.dpbolvw.net/click-3425915-10558284"; target="_top"> http://www.awltovhc.com/image-3425915-10558284"; width="125"
height="125" alt="Meet Beautiful Latin Singles - Join Now!" border="0"/>
__
Debian,
If you have any problems building a debian package for hppa, please
contact me on debian-hppa.
As a porter I've setup a debian buildd on my local hppa machine for
reproducing build problems.
Please don't hesitate to email debian-hppa.
Known issues:
* The ruby1.9 build problem still exis
MaTa, le Sat 11 Jul 2009 15:39:06 +0200, a écrit :
> I'm sorry if I'm not an expert, but you can try with "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text"
> boot parameter, to install using the serial port.
The question is: how do you type this with a PC that has no screen or
keyboard, just a USB plug?
Samuel
--
To UNS
I'm sorry if I'm not an expert, but you can try with "*DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text*"
boot parameter, to install using the serial port.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch05s02.html.en
2009/7/11 Samuel Thibault
> Vincent Danjean, le Mon 06 Jul 2009 11:55:08 +0200, a écrit :
> > I needed it to
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
> > Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and
> > release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to
> > happen?
>
> There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such
> situations as there is no clear plan
Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read
> from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation
> of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised.
>
> Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.3
17 matches
Mail list logo