On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:29:47PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages.
He, radical, but not new :) It has been discussed to death various
times. The most likely (and IMO better) alternative to that is uploading
binaries but trowing them away
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:02:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that some of these checks are ‘bikeshedding’ my work as a packager,
enforcing a parallel and undocumented Policy, and lessering the usefuleness of
Lintian now that some Lintian warnings are FTPmaster errors and vice-versa.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 08:43:35PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote:
The prototypejs script has been found to be vulnerable to a couple
security issues [0],[1]. This script is embedded in about 32 other
- smokeping unfixed (embed)
Only the lenny version (2.3.6-3) is affected. The
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
(On vacation with intermittant access, so it may be a while before I see
responses.)
Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org writes:
this is probably a question more for lintian maintainers, but... what
should we do if lintian is buggy and falsely claims our
On 11917 March 1977, Russ Allbery wrote:
this is probably a question more for lintian maintainers, but... what
should we do if lintian is buggy and falsely claims our package has
one of these tags?
The same as what you would do with any other buggy package in Debian: file
a bug. I don't
Brian May b...@snoopy.debian.net writes:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
- statically-linked-binary
This is not always a bug. e.g. dar-static is supposed to be statically linked!
My packages produce a number of lintian errors/warnings that I don't
Hi
Dne Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:21:18 +1100
Brian May b...@snoopy.debian.net napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
- statically-linked-binary
This is not always a bug. e.g. dar-static is supposed to be statically linked!
And thus is a perfect candidate
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:42:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:03:06PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:59:52PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
I completely disagree with this lintian warning and prefer to use
[Luca Niccoli]
I think Petter meant upload packages which don't build successfully
even on a single architecture.[1]
That is exactly what I meant, yes. :) If the source do not compile on
any architecture, I believe it the maintainer must have failed to done
the minimum checks that should be
Le Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:26:58PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:07:19PM +, Roger Leigh a écrit :
While most developers are conscientious enough to make sure their
packages build, one does see enough crap packages that IMO this
(minimal) bar should
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: utfcpp
Version : 2.2.3
Upstream Author : Nemanja Trifunovic
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/utfcpp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
On 2009-10-28, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
By the way, I just realised that binNMUs directly update the binary packages
in
Testing, shortcutting the 10 day evaluation period. (See
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/r-cran-epibasix/download for example,
where r-cran-epibasix
The time between submitting bugs (or sending messages to control) and the
BTS acting on them is currently much longer than it used to be and, IMHO,
should be. Is this a deliberate change or known issue?
Example: #552576 was submitted 27 Oct 2009 16:26:17 UTC, received by
bugs.d.o 16:26:25 UTC,
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:14 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Luca Niccoli]
I think Petter meant upload packages which don't build successfully
even on a single architecture.[1]
That is exactly what I meant, yes. :) If the source do not compile on
any architecture, I believe it the
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 12:07 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The time between submitting bugs (or sending messages to control) and the
BTS acting on them is currently much longer than it used to be and, IMHO,
should be. Is this a deliberate change or known issue?
Example: #552576 was submitted 27
2009-10-28, Frans Pop:
The time between submitting bugs (or sending messages to control) and the
BTS acting on them is currently much longer than it used to be and, IMHO,
should be. Is this a deliberate change or known issue?
Example: #552576 was submitted 27 Oct 2009 16:26:17 UTC,
Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
- statically-linked-binary
This is not always a bug. e.g. dar-static is supposed to be statically
linked!
Lintian intentionally doesn't warn about binaries with names ending -static,
hence the
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:22:50PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Hi, with the current version of texi2html (1.82-1), I'm getting lots of build
failures like (from diffutils-doc):
[...]
It looks like it put the html files in diff before, but now it's putting them
just in the current
Hi there.
I'd like to ask you guys for some help.
Here in Moscow State University there is a course Software
maintenance in Linux Distribution. It is dedicated to general question
of software packaging. As example they use rpm-based community
repository Sisyphus (related to AltLinux
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Hi there.
I'd like to ask you guys for some help.
Here in Moscow State University there is a course Software
maintenance in Linux Distribution. It is dedicated to general question
of software packaging. As example they
Hello!
Debian Policy 4.9 says about debian/rules:
It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f, so that it can be
invoked by saying its name rather than invoking make explicitly.
In the VDR and VDR plugin packages, we use something like this:
/bin/sh debian/make-special-vdr.sh
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 16:02 +0100, Tobi wrote:
[1]:
http://svn.opensourcefactory.com/svn/vdr/trunk/debian/make-special-vdr.sh
asks for a password. also nothing in what you said explains why you
can't do what you want using a makefile.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Julien Cristau schrieb:
asks for a password.
Sorry, wrong link:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-vdr-dvb/vdr/vdr/trunk/debian/make-special-vdr.sh
also nothing in what you said explains why you
can't do what you want using a makefile.
Because make-special-vdr.sh needs to modify
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It could be argued that relying only on spamassassin is a wasteful use
of our hardware.
We don't only rely on spamassassin.
In my experience and with a very conservative estimate, it is
reasonable to expect that at least 80% of this traffic can be
On Wed, Oct 28 2009, Tobi wrote:
Hello!
Debian Policy 4.9 says about debian/rules:
It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f, so that it can be
invoked by saying its name rather than invoking make explicitly.
In the VDR and VDR plugin packages, we use something like this:
/bin/sh
On Wed, Oct 28 2009, Tobi wrote:
Julien Cristau schrieb:
asks for a password.
Sorry, wrong link:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-vdr-dvb/vdr/vdr/trunk/debian/make-special-vdr.sh
also nothing in what you said explains why you
can't do what you want using a makefile.
Because
Because make-special-vdr.sh needs to modify debian/rules itself.
This way debian/rules doesn't get contaminated with stuff that
goes beyond the scope of building the regular Debian package -e
except for the shebang line.
Why not so it the other way round, i.e. start two different scripts
(or
Don Armstrong wrote:
I'm in the process of working with DSA to add additional mail servers
in front of the bts to handle this issue. (They've configured
everything, I just need to have about 10 more hours in the day.)
Thanks a lot Don.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2009-10-28, Frans Pop:
Don Armstrong wrote:
I'm in the process of working with DSA to add additional mail servers
in front of the bts to handle this issue. (They've configured
everything, I just need to have about 10 more hours in the day.)
Thanks a lot Don.
Seconded
(sorry for the
On Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks a lot Don.
+1
+thanks a lot, DSA too! :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
On Wed, October 28, 2009 13:36, Don Armstrong wrote:
I'm in the process of working with DSA to add additional mail servers
in front of the bts to handle this issue. (They've configured
everything, I just need to have about 10 more hours in the day.)
As someone who needs to fight with
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:31:37AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Hi there.
I'd like to ask you guys for some help.
Here in Moscow State University there is a course Software
maintenance in Linux Distribution. It is
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org writes:
And thus is a perfect candidate for a lintian override. Or maybe
rather filing a wishlist bug for lintian to allow statically linked
binaries in packages whose name ends with -static.
Already done. Here's the Lintian code.
# Some exceptions: files
Tobi wrote:
Or should we just add a Linitan override? Or do we really need to use
#!/usr/bin/make -f as the shebang line in debian/rules?
Use make. it is able to do all the things you're doing right now, including to
do different stuff based on an environment setting.
Personally I would vote
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:31:37AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
[..]
I'm going to lecture there (2 hours) about Debian project, deb
packages, repositories, release cycle etc. So that would be something
like debian
Personally I would vote for dropping the make requirement from the
policy all together. I might be mistaken, but I think none of the
build tools calls make explicitly with debian/rules. A debian/rules
might even be a Python or Rake script.
[Bernd Zeimetz]
Oh god, no. And I'm not even
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:05:51PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
Can you make a list? I do not think there is a significant number, I
only know about vmware.
Well, last time I tried bindv6only=1 on a server running many listening
daemons.
Over half of them stopped working properly (not
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Why not so it the other way round, i.e. start two different scripts (or
the same script with different parameters) from a debian/rules Makefile
depending on the environment variable?
Might be possible, but it would require major changes to debian/rules, but
our goal is
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is what the make directive 'include' is all
about. Conditionally, include fileA or fileB. Each file is all
uncontaminated now.
This is not a technical shortcoming of using Makefiles.
You're right. What we do might be possible from within the
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 22:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Well, the issue raised in LKML is that you absolutely should *not* enable
-fstack-protector-all unless you _really_ know what you're doing, and most
certainly not by default. It has nothing to do with -fstack-protector, just
Le Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:02:32PM +0100, Tobi a écrit :
Debian Policy 4.9 says about debian/rules:
It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f, so that it can be
invoked by saying its name rather than invoking make explicitly.
Dear all,
I also do not understand that rule. There are a
On Wed, Oct 28 2009, Tobi wrote:
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Why not so it the other way round, i.e. start two different scripts (or
the same script with different parameters) from a debian/rules Makefile
depending on the environment variable?
Might be possible, but it would require major
On Wed, Oct 28 2009, Tobi wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is what the make directive 'include' is all
about. Conditionally, include fileA or fileB. Each file is all
uncontaminated now.
This is not a technical shortcoming of using Makefiles.
You're right. What we
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:05:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28 2009, Tobi wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is what the make directive 'include' is all
about. Conditionally, include fileA or fileB. Each file is all
uncontaminated now.
This is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk
* Package name: imspector
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Lawrence Manning lawre...@aslak.net
* URL : http://www.imspector.org/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:33:45 +0200
Source: sample7
Binary: sample7
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org
Changed-By: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:46:16 +0100
Source: dynare
Binary: dynare dynare-common dynare-doc dynare-matlab
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 4.0.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:24:25 +0100
Source: btrfs-tools
Binary: btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.19-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@lists.debian-maintainers.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:24:25 +0100
Source: btrfs-tools
Binary: btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.19-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@lists.debian-maintainers.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:24:25 +0100
Source: btrfs-tools
Binary: btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.19-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@lists.debian-maintainers.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:30:33 +0100
Source: cameleon
Binary: cameleon cameleon-doc libcameleon-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.9.19-1+exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:46:16 +0100
Source: dynare
Binary: dynare dynare-common dynare-doc dynare-matlab
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 4.0.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:09 +0100
Source: elyxer
Binary: elyxer
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.34-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian LyX Maintainers pkg-lyx-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:55:29 -0400
Source: fakeroot
Binary: fakeroot
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.14.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Clint Adams sch...@debian.org
Changed-By: Clint Adams sch...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:56:03 +0100
Source: findimagedupes
Binary: findimagedupes
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.18-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:57:23 +0100
Source: gdcm
Binary: libgdcm2.0 libgdcm-tools libgdcm2-dev libgdcm2.0-dbg libgdcm-cil
libgdcm-java python-gdcm libvtkgdcm2.0 libvtkgdcm2-dev libvtkgdcm-cil
libvtkgdcm-java python-vtkgdcm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:36:06 +0100
Source: iceweasel
Binary: iceweasel iceweasel-gnome-support iceweasel-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:15:43 +0100
Source: jhdf
Binary: libjhdf5-java libjhdf5-jni libjhdf-doc libjhdf4-java libjhdf4-jni
hdfview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:53:35 +
Source: jppy
Binary: python-jppy jppy jppy-doc jppy-jpilot-plugins jppy-lbdb-module
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.0.53-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: jppy development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:15:12 +0100
Source: kbd-chooser
Binary: kbd-chooser
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:06:05 +0100
Source: krecipes
Binary: krecipes krecipes-doc krecipes-data krecipes-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.0~alpha4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:10:29 +0100
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Binary: libgnucrypto-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:15:06 +0100
Source: libjboss-cache2-java
Binary: libjboss-cache2-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.2.GA-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:24:40 +0100
Source: libkml
Binary: libkml0 libkml-dev libkml-java python-kml
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:01:07 +0200
Source: libphp-pclzip
Binary: libphp-pclzip
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Federico Gimenez Nieto fgime...@coit.es
Changed-By: Federico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:55:59 +
Source: lives
Binary: lives libweed0 libweed-dev lives-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jens Peter Secher j...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:43:26 +0100
Source: localechooser
Binary: localechooser
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:06:39 +0100
Source: ltris
Binary: ltris
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Tuckley col...@debian.org
Changed-By: Colin Tuckley col...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:12:15 -0400
Source: magicrescue
Binary: magicrescue
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Varun Hiremath va...@debian.org
Changed-By: Varun Hiremath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:35:04 +0100
Source: mlton
Binary: mlton
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20091028
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) terps...@debian.org
Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:38:15 +
Source: mpop
Binary: mpop mpop-gnome
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org
Changed-By: Emmanuel Bouthenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:59:06 +
Source: msmtp
Binary: msmtp msmtp-gnome msmtp-mta
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.4.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:04:00 +0200
Source: necpp
Binary: necpp libnecpp0 python-necpp libnecpp-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.0+cvs20091005-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emmanuel QUEMENER
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:46:28 +0100
Source: nspr
Binary: libnspr4-0d libnspr4-dev libnspr4-0d-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Maintainers of Mozilla-related packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:21:24 +0300
Source: perl
Binary: perl-base libcgi-fast-perl perl-doc perl-modules perl-debug perl-suid
libperl5.10 libperl-dev perl
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 5.10.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:21:31 -0200
Source: php-xml-serializer
Binary: php-xml-serializer
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.20.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Federico Gimenez Nieto fgime...@coit.es
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:37:47 +0200
Source: pgpool2
Binary: pgpool2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rodolphe Quiédeville rodol...@quiedeville.org
Changed-By: Rodolphe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:35:40 -0700
Source: puppet
Binary: puppet puppetmaster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.25.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Puppet Package Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:08:19 +0900
Source: r-cran-epitools
Binary: r-cran-epitools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:52:12 +0100
Source: rootskel-gtk
Binary: rootskel-gtk
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:12:30 +0100
Source: stressapptest
Binary: stressapptest
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Prokop m...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michael Prokop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:49:28 +
Source: trac-bitten
Binary: trac-bitten
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6b2.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:46:25 +0100
Source: tvtime
Binary: tvtime
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:50:25 +0100
Source: userdevfs
Binary: userdevfs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:15:45 +0100
Source: xulrunner
Binary: xulrunner-1.9.1 xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support libmozjs2d libmozjs-dev
libmozjs2d-dbg spidermonkey-bin xulrunner-dev xulrunner-1.9.1-dbg
libmozillainterfaces-java
Ok, gracias.
No me di cuenta de la New Policy.
--
Alejandro
El 26 de octubre de 2009 02:41, Mauro Lizaur deb...@cacavoladora.orgescribió:
2009-10-25, Alejandro:
Hola a todos,
Hace poco intento debianizar una aplicaci n en la que estoy
usando python-support, debhelper y quilt para el
87 matches
Mail list logo
