Package: sysvinit-utils
Severity: wishlist
* Ted Ts'o [2011-03-26 19:07 -0400]:
> There are similar, although less serious, issues with filefrag -v
> (which will work on other file systems), but which also has some
> ext2/3/4 specific code it in.
badblocks is also linked against libext2fs.
> A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
* Package name: eigen3
Version : 3.0.0
* URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org
* License : (GPL, LGPL)
Programming Lang: (C, C++)
Description : Eigen 3 is a lightweight C++ template library for vector
an
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:42:09PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
>
> The only other thing I can see is that e2fsprogs contains lsattr and
> chattr - a quick grep through my local /var/lib/dpkg/info shows that
> chattr is used in the postfix postinst without an explicit dependency.
> I wonder if there
On Sat, 26, Mar, 2011 at 11:47:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek spoke thus..
> Hi folks,
>
> Currently the e2fsprogs package is marked Essential: yes in the archive. Is
> this a historical holdover? I believe e2fsprogs used to ship /sbin/fsck,
> but since 2009 (i.e., util-linux (>= 2.15~rc1-1), which
i-virtuve (virtualaa) ienak ari juusu majaas -
izveido burgerus sev pieejamajaa datoraa , bet notiesaa tos iistaa restoranaa!
http://www.docorciscount6betshop.ca.pn/jd9eu.html - protams, tev jaaspiezh tur,
lai visu uzzinaatu!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Le samedi 26 mars 2011 à 08:38 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> I have just skimmed over the dicussions from 2009 where we decided that it
> should be one ddeb per source package, and it seems that everyone preferred
> one
> ddeb per binary package except the ftpmasters :) So that's fine
Mark Hymers wrote:
> Ben Hutchings recently discovered that old lenny CDs (5.0.0) currently
> fail to install. Phil Kern discovered that this was because they
> couldn't validate the security signing key (which was rolled over after
> they were released).
I ran into this problem yesterday. Thank
Hi folks,
Currently the e2fsprogs package is marked Essential: yes in the archive. Is
this a historical holdover? I believe e2fsprogs used to ship /sbin/fsck,
but since 2009 (i.e., util-linux (>= 2.15~rc1-1), which e2fsprogs has a
pre-depends on), this has been provided by util-linux instead.
T
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:32:27 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think so. The package with long names tend to follow a naming policy
> > > that sort of imposes the long name... so if we put a too-short limit
> > > then we're asking them to make an exception in the naming policy.
> > Right, that's
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdist-zilla-plugin-podspellingtests-perl
Version : 1.103491
Upstream Author : Marcel Gruenauer , Harley Pig
* URL :
ht
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>> That's not our problem, is it?
>
> It is, if we are trying to be as compatible as possible.
Compatible with what? Bugs in other implementations?
What does that really gain us?
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-req
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:41, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> I've not been able to connect to BTS using reportbug and only got the
> "Unable to connect to Debian BTS" message. Is BTS down?
I had similar problems minutes ago, but now it seems working.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixh
Hi,
I've not been able to connect to BTS using reportbug and only got the
"Unable to connect to Debian BTS" message. Is BTS down?
Regards,
ST
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Am Freitag 25 März 2011, 21:59:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:48:15PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:27:57PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > > > The
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 15:18 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:56:14 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > > We already have arbitrary limits on filename length (~200 bytes or so
> > > on RockRidge), even before this. I'm just proposing to lower them for
> > > a common use case.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:56:14 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > We already have arbitrary limits on filename length (~200 bytes or so
> > on RockRidge), even before this. I'm just proposing to lower them for
> > a common use case. Do we really care about supporting *very* long
> > names here?
> I t
On 26/03/11 09:10, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I'd also mandate the use of build-ids for .ddebs and add refcounting support
>> (like has been done for multiarch AFAIK) to dpkg for them, so we don't need
>> to
>> worry about Conflicts / Replaces.
>
Hi,
there are currently two ways to indicate what Debian considers
"Build-Essential". There is the package build-essential and there is
also a flag in the packages files.
We think it was used to be able to calculate the B-E packages by "just
looking at the packages files", but we do not see a goo
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I'd also mandate the use of build-ids for .ddebs and add refcounting support
> (like has been done for multiarch AFAIK) to dpkg for them, so we don't need to
> worry about Conflicts / Replaces.
For multi-arch, it's the _same_ package (but just a
Hi,
Ben Hutchings recently discovered that old lenny CDs (5.0.0) currently
fail to install. Phil Kern discovered that this was because they
couldn't validate the security signing key (which was rolled over after
they were released). Originally, lenny security updates were signed
with the old ftp
On 26/03/11 08:07, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> The way I did it was one .ddeb per source package, not per binary. So it is
>> $src-ddeb. You can reject them if they are not for $src package (or if $src
>> package doesn't exist in the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> The way I did it was one .ddeb per source package, not per binary. So it is
> $src-ddeb. You can reject them if they are not for $src package (or if $src
> package doesn't exist in the archive).
To simplify the archive processes i
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> There are uses I've heard about, including (apparently quite common)
> >> using CDs and DVDs to seed a mirror on a Windows server.
> >
> >If I had to chose between t
23 matches
Mail list logo
