Bug#632002: ITP: pvclust -- Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Plessy Package name: pvclust Version : 1.2-2 Upstream Author : Ryota Suzuki , Hidetoshi Shimodaira URL : http://www.is.titech.ac.jp/~shimo/prog/pvclust/ License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: R Description

Re: throw away debs and source only uploads

Hi, Chipping in late... sorry for that. 2011/6/7 Don Armstrong : > On Tue, 07 Jun 2011, Andreas Barth wrote: >> > Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be >> > followed immediately by a binNMU. [Are there any cases where we >> > wouldn't want to rebuild the package after

Re: debian-ppc port for ps3-otheros++

On 06/26/2011 11:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 08:04 -0400, Durandal Dokucheyav wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am contacting you guys on behalf of http://gitbrew.org. We have >> recently released the otherOS++ firmware for the Sony Playstation 3, >> allowing the install of third-pa

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

Hi, Am 28.06.2011 19:56, schrieb Joachim Breitner: >> The only nss modules outside of eglibc that *are* available in biarch today >> are nss_ldap, nss_mdns*, nss_myhostname, and nss_extrausers. > > nss_gw_name would be if the depedency libnl had multilibs support. I'll be happy to take patches f

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:56:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > libnss-myhostname and libnss-extrausers ship the biarch versions of the > > module in the same package. libnss_mdns builds a separate lib32nss-mdns > > biarch package, and biarch libnss_ldap is only available in ia32-libs. So

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 28.06.2011, 15:32 +0100 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > No special handling has been proposed for nss modules beyond > > > that - though this is already a substantial improvement over the status > > > quo, > > > where about half our nss modules have biarch versions available an

Bug#631961: ITP: maven-stapler-plugin -- Maven plugin for developing stapler applications

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: maven-stapler-plugin Version : 1.15 * URL : http://stapler.java.net/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Maven plugin for developing stapler applications Maven2

Bug#631960: ITP: stapler-adjunct-timeline -- Timeline visualisation library for use with stapler

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: stapler-adjunct-timeline Version : 1.3 * URL : http://stapler.java.net * License : BSD Programming Lang: Java, JavaScript Description : Timeline visualisation library for use with stapler

Bug#631959: ITP: stapler -- Stapler HTTP request handling engine

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: stapler Version : 1.167 * URL : http://stapler.java.net * License : BSD Programming Lang: Java Description : Stapler HTTP request handling engine Stapler is a library that "staples" you

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:19:27PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Steve Langasek [110628 00:36]: > > > Is there anything for nss plugins yet? As plugins for libc one needs to > > > make sure that if it is installed, it is installed for all installed > > > libcs. > > > With bi-arch/multilib on

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On 2011-06-28 10:34:14 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:40:03AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 16:20:23 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > So this: > > > > So it should be a matter of changing that to print this instead on > > > > Debian > > > > mul

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On 2011-06-28 09:54:34 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:05:05AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-11/msg00341.html > > > > This particular issue will not occur with multiarch, because > > > /usr/lib/ will never be a symlink to /usr

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

* Steve Langasek [110628 00:36]: > > Is there anything for nss plugins yet? As plugins for libc one needs to > > make sure that if it is installed, it is installed for all installed libcs. > > With bi-arch/multilib one can get there by just having it compiled for all > > possible variants. Is ther

Re: relationships with GNU as an upstream - call for feedback

Le mardi 21 juin 2011 à 17:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > I'll be glad to talk about that. But I would also like to take the > chance to present how we feel about GNU as an upstream, in case we have > anything more to say about GNU than what we have to say about other > upstreams (see fo

Bug#631929: ITP: gnomad2 -- music manager for Creative Labs NOMAD and Zen devices

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: gnomad2 Version : 2.9.5 Upstream Author : Linus Walleij * URL : http://gnomad2.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : music manager for Creative Labs NO

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

Zitat von Steve Langasek : One question, though: How are build tools like CMake converted to use Multiarch directories for the installation rule? I don't have a generic recipe for converting cmake to install to the multiarch directory. If someone has one, please add it to

Bug#631928: ITP: emacs-calfw -- A calendar framework for Emacs

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: KURASHIKI Satoru * Package name: emacs-calfw Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : SAKURAI, Masashi * URL : https://gist.github.com/kiwanami/emacs-calfw/ * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp Description : A

Bug#631927: ITP: libhttp-server-simple-authen-perl -- Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" * Package name: libhttp-server-simple-authen-perl Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen/ * License : Artistic / GPL Pro

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:30:51AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2011-06-27 15:59:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > If by "fat binaries" you mean executables, > > No, I meant libraries (the term "fat binary" is used by the GMP library, > but is here restricted to x86 subarchs). > > > If by

Re: pam_listfile / pam_supair

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:51:48AM +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > On 2011-06-27 18:42, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:49:34PM +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > >> This specifies that users sf, u2 and u3 can each do passwordless su to > >> users root and sf2. User sf2 can

Re: Multi-Arch .udeb ?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:40:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Yep, looks almost identical to my patch here, with only one difference: the > > runtime support packages need to be marked Multi-Arch: foreign in order to > > satisfy the

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:58:47AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Montag, den 27.06.2011, 11:54 +0100 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > Next steps for maintainers > > == > > > > If you are a maintainer of a shared library package, you can convert it to > > multiarch today fo

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:40:03AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 16:20:23 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > So this: > > > So it should be a matter of changing that to print this instead on Debian > > > multiarch: $ gcc -print-multi-os-directory > > > x86_64-linux-gnu > > > $

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

* Steve Langasek [110628 08:42]: > > On the downside, files which are the same would be duplicated, but since a > > vast majority of libraries use #ifdefs instead of modifying the files, the > > waste would be infinitessimally low. > > I don't know what this "vast majority of libraries" is. Most

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:05:05AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-11/msg00341.html > > This particular issue will not occur with multiarch, because /usr/lib/ > > will never be a symlink to /usr/lib in the canonical implementation. > There will be the sam

Re: Multiarch in Debian unstable

Hi, Am Montag, den 27.06.2011, 11:54 +0100 schrieb Steve Langasek: > Next steps for maintainers > == > > If you are a maintainer of a shared library package, you can convert it to > multiarch today following the instructions in the Debian wiki: > > http://wiki.debian.or

Re: Multi-Arch .udeb ?

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yep, looks almost identical to my patch here, with only one difference: the > runtime support packages need to be marked Multi-Arch: foreign in order to > satisfy the dependencies of the multiarch libraries. Attached. (This is > also b

Re: Multi-Arch .udeb ?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:31:50PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:04:23 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The convention I've adopted so far for udeb-building packages has been to > > install libraries in /usr/lib instead of to /usr/lib/$arch. > Ok, that makes sense to me. O